Parthasarathi Loganathan
20 January 2010 at 20:23
When I was a Law Student during the mid 80s, I felt that, to become a successful lawyer, one should have three basic entities required for the profession. I presumed these three entities are Money Power, Muscle Power and Political Power. Since all these aspects were absent to support me on the long run, I did not take up law practice. Though I am settled as a successful banker in its IT field I am still puzzled about that decision and conclusion. I find even without talent and knowledge about law one can survive in this profession successfully as I see many lawyers even from my own family fall under this category. I do not know as to Whether I am right or wrong. Academic brilliance and inherent professional talents would hardly come to the rescue to make a mark in the society. I invite all learned brothers to join this debate.
vijeta
20 January 2010 at 20:21
when a person is given life imprisonment does that mean that he is to be released after 14 years of imprisonment
shivraj
20 January 2010 at 20:10
If the third party purchased the societies property in auction can member of society can challange the auction under sec.91 jurisdiction of co-operative court u/maharstra co-operative act 1960 to try this case?
Chetan
20 January 2010 at 20:03
In a case - my client had entered into an agreement of sale on 1981. (my clien was a purchaser)
-The earnest note was executed in the year 1981 & since then the property was in possession of my cliet.
- The seller did not execute the Sale Deed on time and therefore my client send a legal notice in 1985 but after receiving the notice the seller did not respond it...
-But till today the property is not mutated in the name of my client whereas during this period my client had rented it on time to time..
-In 2008 the Seller had died and his son in 2010 made an application for mutation of that property..
Question :- What shall i do
1) Whether I have to file a suit for Declaration, andPossession
2) To whom I have made party (to all the legal heirs or the son who made an application)
Pls provide ----urgently
gurcharn goyal
20 January 2010 at 20:00
can a female be a respondent under THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005. Under section 2(q) of the said act respondent is only a male.
And in the decision of gwalior bench
RCR Criminal 2007(4)930(M.P.)case namely Ajay Kant V.Smt.Alka Sharma it is decided that a respondent will be male. can you give me the Supreme court judgments in favor of Said citation.
gurcharn goyal
20 January 2010 at 19:57
can a female be a respondent under THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005. Under section 2(q) of the said act respondent is only a male.
And in the decision of gwalior bench
RCR Criminal 2007(4)930(M.P.)case namely Ajay Kant V.Smt.Alka Sharma it is decided that a respondent will be male. can you give me the judgments in favor of Said citation.
Anonymous
20 January 2010 at 19:28
I have made divorce to my wife. Now I need to pay the mata'a to her together with the idda expenses. Wife have the similar finacial status. Please guide me for the following.
1)How can I calculate the mata'a (Muslim- Sunni - Hanafi school)?
2)Is their any previous judgment or law in this regard?
3)Is the Husbands earning will consider for the mata'a calculaton? My monthly income is Rs.10000.
Anonymous
20 January 2010 at 18:55
Are Two co-pliantiffs permitted to have their two different advocates in a single suit? The facts are that one of joint owners had filed the eviction petition under delhi rent control act against the tenant and other joint owner was made a performa respondent who later on transposed / impleaded as a co-plaintiff. Now whether these two plaintiffs can have two different advocate in the same suit? The imposed Plaintiff has adopted the same petition and has also submitted the affadavit for that. Releif claimed is same in the suit.Please answer this legal issue. if you are aware of any legal pronouncement in this regard please quote that also.
rajvinder singh
20 January 2010 at 18:07
a suit was filed by plaintiff for of permanent injunction restraining the defendant to construct the roof/projection and decree was passed in his favour.
the suit was against the father and his four sons.the father on appeared as defendant no.1 and others didnot appear before the court.now what happend the sons were not proceede exparte.the father was not the attorney of his sons.during the evidence of defendant the father died and the evidence of him was closed by order of court.then the decree was passed in favour of plaintiff.
now we want to challenge the decree can it be challenged or we should file application to corect the proceeding u/s 153
pls reply
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
FIR HIMSELF
Sir,
In our state Revenue inspector ( Lekhpal) has been conferred with some police powers. One such revenue inspector lodged fake FIR, himself in his register, that "A" has misbehaved with him and disturbed him from performing official duty. Sir my question is that whether, one who himself is a victim of an offence can lodge FIR himself, who himself is registering authority?
Sir it is very urgent if there is any citation please help me.I have to defend the accused.