Reshma K
03 February 2010 at 23:48
Are employees getting more than Rs 6500 pm as basic pay eligible for EPF. Can you pls clarify very clearly if the employers have to provide pf for people getting salary like 20K etc. You see all software company employees get huge salareis and all of them have pf. What is this cap of Rs 6500.
Question 2.
Is this 6500 referring to basic pay. And are there guidelines regarding fixing of basic pay in the total salary.
Question 3.
This has troubled me a great deal and i have scratched my head on this. What is wages and what is salary. What is the difference between the two. Please help
vinod bansal
03 February 2010 at 22:59
R/Members
I m representing complainant in a case of pvt complaint u/ss 452/325 ipc etc at the stage of framing of charge court discharged the accused,now what is remeady available to me,whether before hghcourt or sessions court in appeal or revision kindly help me with relevent provisions of crpc.secondly let me know whether this discharge is amounts to acquittal. Thanks a lot in anticipation to all.Regards
Vinod Bansal Advocate
RTI Activist Jind Hr.
GIRISH AGRAWAL
03 February 2010 at 22:48
A SALRIED EMPLOY’S RECEIVED SALARY FOR F.Y. 2009-2010 OF Rs. 2,99,510 AND ALSO RECEIVED ARREARS FOR FOLLOWING FINANCIAL YEAR..
F.YEAR ....... SALARY.............GPF
2005-06 ... ... 11,952.00 ... ... 1434.00
2006-07 ... ... 46,096.00 ... ... 5532.00
2008-09 ... ... 16,720.00 ... ... 2006.00
2009-10 ... ... .6,064.00 ... ... .728.00
... ... ... ... --------------------------
... ..TOTAL......80,832.00 ........9700.00
... ... ... ... --------------------------
RECPECTED INCOME TAX EXPERTS:-
1. IS DEDUCT GPF RS 9700 BEFOR
CALCULATION OF TABLE A FORM 10 E ?
2. IS DEDUCTION RS 9700 OF U/S 80C ?
3. PLEASE GIVE ME A BETTER ADVOICE?
pritam devagonavar
03 February 2010 at 21:19
in one decided case, Nuisance was caused by a brick grinding machine to a reputed doctor. there wasd strong physical inconvenience to doctor.
Member (Account Deleted)
03 February 2010 at 20:39
tahnks to all experts.... but sir with all due respect to evry one.... i also try to go deep in that problem.... i ve read section 145 of evidence act and also section 162 of code of criminal procedurethat read as follows
section 162 Cr.P.C.. Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence.
(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of' an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it, nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made:
Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of' his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of' the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872) and when any part of' such statement is so used, any part thereof' may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement failing within the provisions of clause (1) of section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), or to affect the provisions of section 27 of that Act.
Explanation. An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.
SECTION 145.Evidence Act, Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing - A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing and relevant to matter in question, without such writing being shown to him, or being proved; but if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him.
so sir, after read both the sections in the secong para of section 162 cr.p.c the words used are "when any witness called for the prosecution" that is very important reason is very clear that if a witness called for the prosecution then if turned hostile then its open for the prosecution to contradict from his previous statements as mentioned in section 145 evidence act. but in my querry the witness is not called by theprosecution , so prosecutor only cross examine that witness but no right to contardict fr his previous statements rcorded under section 161 cr.p.c. coz he is defence witness. Thanx
sir is it right?? pls answer
srikanth
03 February 2010 at 20:30
Hi all,
I my town in petrol bunks kerosene is mixing....to whom i have to make complaint.... to whom i have approach.... pls help on this... due to moxin of petrol there is great damage to ur bikes.. i hope u got my point...thanks in advance
Anonymous
03 February 2010 at 20:09
my wife is either not ready for divorce or for living together. she is working.
I am unable to make her a decision. she is not ready to take any decision and wnats to live like this. i am mentally disturbed as i am unable to live alone.
please give me some suggestion.
Can i marray some one with out any evidence?.
or
can i live togther with some one?.
expecting answers. please answer to my question.
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
03 February 2010 at 19:57
Whether a promise to do certain act, if not done amounts to cheating
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
03 February 2010 at 19:56
Whether prior intention is must in cheating
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Query
Hello Sir,
A is selling a land(45 years old) to B. Value fixed by the registration dept. 1.5 cr. But actually being sold at 3cr. A is asking for white sum, but B is not ready, since he wants to save on registration charges, which is around 20% (both legal and illegal expenses) of the sum. For 1.5 cr it will be about 30lkh and for 3cr it is about 60lkh. On the other hand A does not wish to take cash (black) due to fear. How cash (black) taken will be converted in to white? Or what should I do? Shall I scrape the deal? Thanks