gagandeepsingh.bagga
19 February 2010 at 11:01
Dear All,
Can anybody provide me a judgement/citation which reveals that "Right to Work" should be dealt as urgent matter?
Addtionaly a judgement/fact which also says the following:
The plaintiff should not stop earning his bread and butter, by way of running a shop, just because, he needs to fulfill the law procedure by the way of issuance of post dated notice to MCD before instituting a suit (sec 478)MCD.
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
19 February 2010 at 10:03
After divorce - No issues- As per Divorced Muslim Womens protection act-
In Maintenance case she told marriage consumated - He told marriage not consumated - in this differences arosed in court -How can settle the matter of differencs ? .. Pl guide me
seema arora
19 February 2010 at 09:59
Dear Experts,
Can i claim my share in my fathers property , as my father passed away just few months before my marriage and left no will. The value of property is approx 6 cr +other immovable assets
All details of his property are with my brothers to whom my relations are not good ,can I file the suit of partition directly in Supreme court/High Court, as i am a working woman with limited resources and to my knowledge these civil suits in lower courts take very long time /how can i use that my brothers are discriminating me by saying to terminate all relationship with me.
kindly advise
PS I have no documents in my hand regarding the property and other assets
regards
Atish
19 February 2010 at 08:51
Dear Sirs,
Could anyone please help me with Case Law AIR 1950, Nagpur Bench, Page 110. I was told it denotes on Advocate not allowed to represent the client because he is a prime witness.
This is not only the reason and very important for me as it could not be obtained fron the Law College.
If I could be sent an attachment of this it would really help me. It is required in Pune. Kindly help by sending an attachment of the above or letting me know how to obtain it in Pune with immediate effect.
Time is the essence.
Regards
Atish
Anjali Arya
19 February 2010 at 07:36
Whether Warrant of Delivery of Possession can be granted by Execution Court in Execution of a Decree of Mandatory Injunction ?
Applying the dictum of the Supreme Court, it follows that a decree for injunction must be executed in the manner provided by Rule 32 and the issue of a warrant for delivery of possession in execution of a decree for injunction is not justified either by Rule 35 of Order Xxi or clause (c) of section 51.
A Judgement is attached for your kind persual.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
19 February 2010 at 01:48
Dear Sir,
IN BRIEF MATTER OF FACT
1. Grandfather (A) had inherited large properties and made a registered partition deed (1940) for all the three sons (B),(C),(D) while D was minor when the deed was made only 5 years. (A) died. C also died without marriage i.e he was single passed away.
Now (D) had made seven children d1,d2....d7.
(B) had made 3 children b1,b2,b3.
2. (B) put the partition deed into his custody and gave a small house for living to (D) initially. Hide all the structure of properties mentioned in the partition deed. After that (B) assassinated (D) and his(D) wife in 1970. All the seven children were minor when (D)died and somehow grown up.
3.The children of (D) d1,...d7 know in 2010 and gets the copy of partition deed after 70 years that their father have large properties allotted. Now The (B) sold all the properties of (C)&(D) and (B)died in 2000.
But (B) three children b1,b2,b3 all are alive.
4. Is there any chance to file a suit for recovery immovable properties or reopen partition deed or challenge partition deed or start off 420/406 I.p.C proceedings to start being beneficial for d1,...d7 for recovering all the properties whether the properties illegally transferred or their complete amount from b1,b2,b3.?
Question:
Is there any way to tackle this complicated matter and what's the probability for winning ? A Long battle ground to start. OR Leave out all the past as there is no solution!
Is it Impossible for this problem to be solved.
Anonymous
19 February 2010 at 00:28
Dear sir/Madam
A partnership firm has 4 partners A B C D.
In 2003 C and D were made to retire from partnership by A and B.
C & D signed a dateless retirement deed.
No retirement payment was made at any stage.
C & D continued in partnership till 2009.
Now A & B want to retire them by using that old dateless document by putting a date of 1st april 2009.
1) What is the status of the document if it is proved that the signatures were made six years back and the date was put after six years?
2) Will not handwriting experts be able to tell that signatures were made six years back and the date has been of recent times?
Clayton Mendonca
19 February 2010 at 00:28
An advocate drafts a Will as per what is said by the testator.
My two queries are:
1) Can this Advocate be one of the two witnesses for attesting the Will?
2) If an Advocate who has drafted a Will also signs as one of the witnesses, does the Will become invalid?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
BBMP occupancy certificate
Hi
I bought a flat in apartment of G+3 floors having 40 flats in total in bangalore. Construction is complete and mostly occupied.
Builders saying occupancy certificate not needed for G+3 floors.
Flat is already registered and also got bank loan
So how to go about this? should we bring it to notice of BBMP or file a RTI