Jibanananda Goswami
20 February 2010 at 21:08
A registered Society (Jan Shikshan Sansthan) has a Board of management that was formed on 26-02-09 for 3 years. The society is sponsored by Ministry of HRD, GOI.
On 04-05-09, the Chairman placed a freeze order on the Bank account of the society without specifying any cause. He also ordered that "....trainings will continue as usual" He did not asked any other members for approval.
I asked about it from Bank (UBI) through RTI and the Bank said that "As per Indian Contact Act, any member can place a stop payment/freeze order to the account"
I sent another RTI to the M/HRD and they answered "No such power is vested in the Chairman of JSS"
Now the questions are
1. Is the Contact Act applicable to a registered society?
2. If the majority of Members support the normal operation of Bank account then can any one member stop the operation?
3. The fund was allotted by M/HRD for literacy and vocational trainings. Can I file a PLI against the Chairman?
4. If the employees (are not getting salaries from May-09 due to the stop order) want to claim their salaries they will send notice to the Chairman. But the Chairman is not found in his official address. So if nobody receive the notice, how to start a case?
5. Under which court the matter is to be placed?
6. Some employee's contract term is going to end very soon, but their salaries are due. Is their any process to extend the period until the matter is solved?
vijay
20 February 2010 at 20:56
I (mortgagee)entered into simple mortgage deed in the year 1995 for an amount of 100000/-.There is no stipulated date for repayment.Possession is with mortgager only.On 1999 mortgager gave 70000/- by cheque.Upto this date mortgager telling their sad stories and not giving mortgage amount. Only last month I came to know that the mortgaged property already sold by the mortgager in the year 1998 itself. What is my remedy to get back my money.Can I go Civil as well as criminal?
Chetan
20 February 2010 at 20:35
But,
the person who executed the Earnest note is dead under such circumstances whether I can made a party to his Son who made mutation obejction
another is the earnest note is of 1981 and the much time has been elapsed whether it is fit for limitation Act
Chetan
20 February 2010 at 20:29
Facts of the case :-
That my client get an earnest note executed in his favour about the house property in 1981
but the seller on several request did not execute the sale deed therefore my client send an notice and remain present on a day which was mentioned in the notice but the seller didn't came
That til today the property is in possession of my client and let out it to several person upto today
That the seller have 3 sons out of which 1 son on December 2009 approach to the Gram Panchayt and made application not to mutate the property in the name of my client, the officer of Panchayt published a public notice and my client raise the objection
Qurstion :- under above circumstance what shall i have to be done / advised
1) whether I file suit for declaration, permanent injunction.
Pls reply urgently with citations
regards
O. Mahalakshmi
20 February 2010 at 20:22
Dear Sir,
My father got temporary job as a driver in Mechanised Launch in Customs & Central Excise in Kakinada on 29-1-1985 for Rs.20/- per day. At the time of joining temporary his is 35 years and 1 month. One month age is extra than the required age. But his educational qualifications is enough and he has plenty of sea service. After that, he has taken as continue daily wages for regular salary from on 2-3-1990. But he was regularised by Central Govt. on 1-3-1997. While taking him into the job the Central Govt. officials demanded my father to obtain letter from him not to consider his previous service, which was he done from 29-1-1985 to 2-3-1990. So my father signed on the letter that he never asked about the service. But now my father will be retired on 31-12-2009. Can he get the previous service included in present service. Can he file a case against the central govt. after retirement? Kindly suggest me some case Laws reguarding this ground.
O. Mahalakshmi
20 February 2010 at 20:17
Dear Colleagues
Some one wants to get divorce by mutual consent. But both the parties have already married with different persons. So they want to get Divorce by mutual consent. Indian marriage Act 1955, U/s 10-A, I want some Case Laws please suggest me case Laws. Thanking you.
Anonymous
20 February 2010 at 18:58
sir
legal protection to the bank, when the document was misplaced while in the custody of the Bank. legal remedies protecting the interest of the bank, or protections available to the bank. case law if any
with regards
Anonymous
20 February 2010 at 18:11
Sir, I got married in the year 2001 and got separated form 27/12/2003 which is six yrs and few months not seen each other face also , Recently on 07/01/2010 I filed a Divorce in the Visakhapatnam District Principal Family Court where our marriage was performed the Notices have been served and They attended the First hearing on 09/02/2010 but case was adjourned to Later Date at 08/03/2010 as the Judge was on Leave,
One week Later they(Respondent to Divorce case) Filed a Section 9 Petition on 15/02/2010 at Place nearly 38kms from Visakhapatnam at the Senior Civil Judge Court Anakapalli girls Place,
Let me Confess after Six years of Irreparable relation ship Where in had suffered both Brutal and Suttle kind of Cruelty and Humiliation i am not interested any conciliation process,
My Question is If Section9 Goes in Favor Ex-pate to the Respondent from Senior Civil Judge Court as i am not interested to contest, Can That Order be challenged at the District Principal Family Court Where my Divorce Case is Pending which was instituted 2 months Before?
Dr C Suresh
20 February 2010 at 18:03
After arguments are over by both sides and the judge says Judgment reserved, what does it mean? And what is the difference when Judge says "For Orders" instaead of Judgment reserved, after arguments are over?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maintenance
Can anyone tell me is there any act that forbids a wife from filing a maintenance petition either under section 125 of Cr.p.C or under personal law if the husband is dwelling in a foreign country?
V.Ramakrishnan