Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 13:46
Under which Act is the Contract Labour working in Schools covered?
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 13:44
My grandfather had purchased land , the funding of land and construction over same is done by my father and grand father .
My grand father had 3 sons . After construction he handed over ground floor to my father . Since 1973 we are residing there . My grandfather expired in 1973 , leaving behind grandmother and 3 sons.
The propery was never transfered to any one after his death . My father expired in 1994 and grandmother in 1999 , and one of my uncle expired in 2004 . The property still stands in grandfather name .
Now my uncle and aunt has applied for there share in Estate office to tune of 35% and 35% each and ours 30% , on ground that after death of my father the share again split in our family and my grandmother .
Ie Upon my Grand father death -
Grandmother 25%
My father 25%
my uncle-1 25%
my unclr-2 25%
As my father expired in 1994 , then 25% splits in
My grandmother 6%
my mother 6%
myself 6%
my brother 6%
hence my Grandmother share become 31%.
On my grandmother death 31% split in 3 parts
Hence our family in total is getting 29.71% .
We have renovated the groundfloor , and my other uncles family is getting rent for 1st floor alternative months.
pls advice is our family share is only 30% .What is provision of oral partion alraedy happened 40 yrs back and we are in possession of Ground floor and my father has incurred amount on construction and till date no one had claimed any mutation .
regards
Rajesh Singh
19 April 2010 at 13:37
A customer booked product from a shop at half price which was winding up. Later learnt that product is of china made and refuse to accept part of the order. for the whole order part payment is made by the customer for which chacha bill is given by the shopkeeper and warranty is verbal not by the company its only by the dealer and shopkeeper.
What is the Stand of customer can he reject , part of the order.
Can shopkeeper force the customer to take the goods in whole.
anupam sharma
19 April 2010 at 13:36
a father transferred his property in punjab to son vide aregistered document,but now he is apprehensive that the sonm would sell it...he wishes to get an injunction against sale of property by son till he is alive??? can it be done??? any other remedy for the father is available???
Neha Singh
19 April 2010 at 13:32
Sir/ Madam ,
I am a student of final year Law of three years degree course. Iam willing to appear in Judicial Serviice exams of various states. Kindly help with the relevant coaching institutes which can be of help preferably in Delhi, Allahabad , Banaras. Please also let me know the exact channel from where I can get the updates of such exams.
Nitu Kapoor
19 April 2010 at 13:13
Dear Expertise,
My meternal grand father died on 10th Nov. 2009. Now his successors are his two sons and one daughter (my mother). He has left his flat and his commercial place without will. Now after the ceromony of the 13th day my maternal uncels was forceing by means of threatning to my mother to leave her share in that property which she without her willingness has agreed to do so, then they took my mother in front of all the society members to say that she don’t want any share in her father’s property. They also took her signature on the stam paper to tranfer the flat share on their name.
Now we came to know from one of her friend and the member of that society that the share has been transferred to her brothers name and society has given that whole building for the redevlopment to a well known builder. Builder has signed memorandum of understanding with the society and the members of that society. Two month before builder has issued one advertisment in local news paper and one national news paper for any claim on that property which we didn’t came across that advertisment. Now that builder has given the project to get pass from BMC. These propert is in mumbai.
Now my querys are
1) Can my mother can still claim for her share in that property? If yes, How?
2) By any means can we still ask the builder to stop the process.
Also pls advice if you have samoting more to say other than my query
I will be very thankful and appricaite you if you provide any solution to this.
dhiraj
19 April 2010 at 12:06
WHETHER TAX WOULD BE DEDUCTED IF THE EXPENSES PAYMENT IS BEING MADE TO VENDOR/PAYEE UNDER COURT AWARD. IN THE NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES TDS IS DEDUCTED AS PER THE PROVISION OF INCOME TAX ACT.
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 12:05
HI,
I am Nayudu entered into sale agreement in 2009. But the agreement is not registered... wht is the legal procedure... to get registered....
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 11:58
Respected Experts,
Plz. Give me a suitable solution for the below mentioned problem.
“A” is the Builder and “B” is the land owner. Both of them have executed an un-registered Memorandum for Development Rights on dt. 31-04-2006 for a project, as per the terms and conditions, as mentioned therein. Accordingly the Builder has paid some advance amount to the land owners in this connection. But the said amount has shared by “C”, after their mutual agreement, since the developer has offered to share some extent or partnership in the above project to “C”, as they are business friends.
Later, the said project went in administrative litigations in clearing the file before the Government, the Builder is not interested to continue the same. Towards full and final settlement of his payment, “C” has introduced and offered “D” with 30% of premium in the total project and was not informed about the litigation. Having faith and confidence on “C”, ”D” has invested some amount and settle the issue of the Builder.
After payment made by “D”, the Builder has handed over the Original document ie., Memorandum for Development Rights dt. 31-04-2006 (un-registered) to “D”. The said fact is known to the land owners and “C”.
Now everybody has dropped from the above project. Even now, the land owners or “C” did not come up settlement of the amounts of “D” and simply prolonging the matter without any solution, even after several demands made by “D” either personally or through the mediators.
In this:-
(1) The above said document is not in favour of either “C” or “D”.
(2) “C” also invested some amounts, but no document is in favour.
(3) Now “C” has taken total responsibility in clearing the issue of “D”, but playing game without clearing the issue.
(4) Now how “D” can recover his money from them. He is having only the original document in his possession.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
hindu law
Dear Sir,
3. It is submitted that my clienti.e., Balakrishna is only son of Radhakrishna Reddy and Hymavathi of Kondayapalem of Nellore. Whileso that the father of my client and his mother in the year 2007 expressed their intention to celebrate the marriage of my client to their friends & relatives requesting them to choose a bride from an agricultural family with minimum education and also expressed that they do not need any dowry in consideration marriage of their son.
It is humbly that while the search for bride is in force during the year 2007 that the Respondent’s parents and her relatives along with Gattamaneni Sudhakar Naidu approached my client’s family at Vedayapalem on 25-11-2007 and represented that respondent is the daughter of Kalluru Sreedevi and Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy studying Intermediate at Naidupet attained Puberty and willing to offer respondent for marriage to this Petitioner. That the Respondent’s parents and relatives namely Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy, Manda Srinivasulu Reddy, P. Syamalamma and P. Devasena, had also represented that the respondent is a healthy, fully grown up girl for marriage, suitable to the Petitioner’s family and invited the Petitioner and his family members to visit their residence at Naidupet. Accordingly the Petitioner and his family members and one G.Sudhakar Naidu visited the respondent’s house at the request of respondent’s parents and relatives the family members of respondent. Respondent’s Parents and relatives were also present during that Occasion. Thus all respondent’s relatives including her parents represented prior to the fixing off the marriage that all of them brought up respondent with more love and affection since respondent is the only daughter of Madusudhan reddy and Sreedevi.
6. It is submitted that the respondent also expressed her desire and consented to marry this Petitioner at the desire and abetment of Respondent’s Parents and relatives. The Petitioner and his family members consented for celebrating marriage at Naidupet. The marriage was celebrated on 23-4-2008 at Naidupet as per the Hindu rites and customs. Though Respondent’s Parents and relatives agreed to bear marriage expenses but expressed their inability to meet the expenses of Pujari and musical players on the occasion of marriage. That Petitioner’s family borns these expenses with happily without expressing any dissent in whatsoever manner. Respondent’s Parents and relatives supervised the celebrations of the marriage of Respondent actively on 23-4-2008. That the Petitioner’s father borne part of expenses of the marriage. That neither this Petitioner nor his family members never demanded any dowry from Respondent’s family.
7. It is submitted that after the marriage respondent joined the house at Kondayapalem in Nellore city on 24-4-2008. The marriage was not consummated as respondent expressed her unwillingness for consummation on health grounds. That this Petitioner waited for two months even after marriage without any consummation and thereafter that he suffered with Jaundice consequently the consummation of marriage was postponed for further period of four months. During the month of October, 2008 that this Petitioner expressed his desire for consummation of marriage with respondent but petitioner observed the nervous feelings of the respondent and oppressed his desire seeing the condition of the respondent.
8. It is submitted that on 21-10-2008 that this Petitioner and his mother and sister had taken respondent for medical examination at Nellore. To the surprise of Doctors and to this Petitioner that Respondent is lack of Primary sexual organs like uterus, ovaries besides accompanied with blind vagina which made her unfit for consummation of marriage much less even for procreation of children. That respondent misrepresented even on 21-10-2008 that she attained puberty subjected to monthly cycles for all these years. That Respondent’s Parents and relatives tutored Respondent to lie each and every occasion regarding her perfection in respect menstrual cycles. That Respondent misrepresented at the house of the Petitioner during her stay for a period of six or eight months that she was subjected menstruation.
9. It is humbly submitted that blind vagina and in the absence of Ovaries there would no Harmonal secretions in Respondent’s body which prevents penetration and in such situation that respondent is unfit for matrimonial life besides for procuring children. The doctor subjected the Respondent to scanning test in doctor p.v.ramachandra reddy peoples’s Poly clinic in the department Ultra Sonography at Nellore and the scanning report bearing No.20080008234 Dt.21-10-2008 is herewith annexed with this petition. The scanning report corroborates the findings of the Doctors besides contradict the versions of Respondent and her parents. Thus Respondent and her parents besides her relatives played a deception against the Petitioner and his family members by misrepresenting that she attained puberty and also subjected to monthly period cycles which resulted marriage of this Petitioner and thereby Petitioner suffered mental injury and damage to his reputation. Hence the deception of Respondent and parents induced the Petitioner and his family members to consent for the marriage on 23-4-2008 and the same caused much loss and pain and the same amounts to cheating. That Respondent and her parents are fully aware about the factum off absence of primary sexual organs in the body of Respondent and knowing fully well that they played deception in misrepresenting the petitioner by inducement which caused the petitioner for consenting the marriage with Respondent.
10. It is submitted that the Petitioner further submits that respondent left the house of the petitioner at Nellore on 31-10-2008 on her own volition and joined her parents. That the respondent’s parents and relatives are again conspired together with respondent and abetted her and to give a false complaint against this Petitioner, his father and mother that she was subjected dowry harassment during her stay at Nellore to SHO, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District. Apprehending arrest from the S.H.O, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District that this Petitioner and his father and mother obtained Anticipatory Bail in Crmp No.1291 of 2008 on the file of Sessions court, Nellore. Dowry harassment news regarding the complaint given by Respondent to S.H.O Ozili, was widely published in Surya Daily Newspaper in Nellore city & District. This caused damage to the Petitioner’s family reputation which lowered down the image of Petitioner and his family in the eye of public as well as friends and relatives of this Petitioner. Thus the conduct of the Respondent is nothing short of defaming of the family reputation of this Petitioner. The Petitioner’s and his family was subjected to great humiliation in the society for no fault of them. That the marriage is voidable as the marriage contravening the provisions Sec.5 (ii) (b) of Hindu Marriage Act and would not give confer any rights to Respondent against this Petitioner and his family members.
please give which type of suggestion to file case against the case