Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 19:49
sir,
I have BA FROM Sri Krishna Devaraya university Anantapure AND master degree from Maulana Azad National Urdu University Hyderabad.but I dont have ssc certificate the problem is i applyed for passport with my cerfificates but my passport has emigiration check requiered stamped. pasport officals are not accepting my certificates becauses i dont have ssc. what should i do?
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 19:33
sir/madam
how to get bail under section 66 of information tech act...somewhere it is written that it is non-bailable offence..but whats the procedure or way to get bail under it
reply soon plz
Member (Account Deleted)
27 April 2010 at 19:20
it is an admitted principle of law that, a woman who is continously living under adultery is disentitled to maintenance U/s. 125 of crpc. now my question is if i am confronted with such a case from the side of husband, what kind of proofs should my client submit, of course without contravening any provisions of law for the time being in force ?
kindly tell me the species of proofs which will prove helpful in family court to prove that she is living in adultery continously.
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 19:18
how much of gold any body can keep with him ?
is there any limit of keeping cash in hand at home ?
Member (Account Deleted)
27 April 2010 at 19:14
facts of the case :A, a tribal handed over his land to a society and drew layouts on it and sold the land in parts (i.e. various plots) to different persons. my client is one such purchaser. now after about 26 years the son of the deceased A, a tribal, is claiming his land from my client and not from other owners of different plots in the same layout. he is claiming the said land U/s. 36A of The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
my question now is that, since the entire land of the late tribal is now put to Non-Agricultural use can the son of the tribal claim such a land legally merely by giving an undertaking to cultivate the said land before the Court/Authority ?
aman kumar
27 April 2010 at 19:09
if a person die in harness /or died & he/she come under N.P.S.,any pension given to his family or not ??
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 19:00
if i am not a income tax payee yet? i had purchased a immovable property.
i want a capital (white money)around 40.lacs. to purchase a property .
my age is 38yrs, there are 3 members in my family . please guide me what to do.
pratik
27 April 2010 at 18:27
Sir,
Pls Give me the explanation of the belowmentioned Act Pls Pls Pls Pls In detail. Pls Pls Pls
THE DECREES AND ORDERS VALIDATING ACT, 1936
ACT NO. 5 OF 1936 [ 26th April, 1936.]
An Act to remove certain doubts and to establish the validity of certain proceedings in High Courts of Judicature 1.
WHEREAS doubts have arisen as to the validity of certain proceedings in High Courts of Judicature 1 under the Letters Patent erecting and establishing those Courts;
AND WHEREAS it is expedient to terminate those doubts and to establish the validity of those proceedings;
It is hereby enacted as follows:-
1. Short title and extent.-
(1) This Act may be called the Decrees and Orders Validating Act, 1936 .
(2) 2[ It extends to the whole of India, except 3[ the territories which, immediately before the 1st November, 1956 , were comprised in Part B States.]]
2. Certain decrees and orders not to be called in question.- No decree passed or order made by the High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal, the High Court of Judicature at Madras or the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in the exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction under clause 12 of its Letters Patent, or by the High Court of Judicature at Rangoon, in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction under clause 10 of its Letters Patent, shall be called in question in any proceedings before any other Court on the ground that the High Court passing the decree or making the order had no jurisdiction to pass or make the decree or order.
3. Restoration of proceedings.- Where in any proceedings concluded on or after the 26th day of August, 1935 , any such decree or order has been found to be invalid on such ground by any Court, such finding shall be void and of no effect; and the Court shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908 ), or any other law for the time being in force, on application made within six months from the commencement of this Act by any person prejudicially affected by such finding, restore the proceedings at and continue the proceedings from the state reached immediately before the order embodying or based on such finding was made.
999999. This Act has been extended to and brought into force in Dadra and Nagar Haveli (w. e. f. 1- 7- 1965 ) by Reg. 6 of 1963, s. 2 and Sch. I.
1. The words" in the Provinces" omitted by the A. O. 1950. 2 Subs., ibid., for sub- section (2). 3 Subs. by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 3) Order, 1956, for" Part B States".
Pls Help Me Explain me the abovementioned act in details.
Thanking U All Experts in Advance.
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 17:51
Respected Experts,
Father has taken amount from me and issued an un-dated Cheque for Rs.1 Lakh. One year back he expired. Now shall I file any case against his LRs for recovery of the said amount. If so plz. Clarity.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
MCD encroaching upon TOT LOT with Police help
Tot Lot, between A-165 and A-166 in Gujranwala Town Part-1, was being encroached upon by Building-plan-approver Civic Agency with the connivance of Delhi Police, who, unmindful of MCD's ulterior motives, as coaxed by A-166 (who almost a decade ago, tried to usurp this TOT LOT by opening his private entry from his side wall and with iron-mesh grill around this 'neighbourhood facility') for his personal egoist aspirations, came along after most of men-folk of the neighbourhood had left the area for their work-places, thereby minimising resistance in their illegal wall construction motive, as they had come in full force on emergency - WAR level;
In the process, while public exchequer was being emptied for such illegal mis-adventure by MCD (said to be always short of revenue to provide for not only lacking civic amenities but also for ghost employees), a few neighbourers came around to observe the huge Police personnel in dress disproportionate to the meagre illegal boundry wall construction of just 24 feet in front, only to restrict common use of the residents around this TOT LOT.
This is neither MCD land nor MCD property but essentially what is described as TOT LOT in the area plans. , TOT LOT is essentially a small piece of land, so provided in the original Block lay-out plan, as approved since 1970-71, for common use of the neighbourhood residents only, as they may like;.
Mass resident representations were made to the Addl.DCP North West Mr. B.S.Jaiswal, and ACP Smt. Pratibha Sharma, Model Town, and Sh.M.S.Nehra, SHO Model Town. It was shockingly exposed during our meeting with the above senior police officers that the MCD had made a request for police protection to carry out demolitions and stop encroachments. Contrary to their request, what the MCD did was to indulge illegally in encroaching upon our small TOT LOT through the misuse of the police machinery and trying to encroach upon and illegally take over the TOT LOT by intimidating the concerned residents into not offerring any resistance.
Of course, the police force was immediately withdrawn after proper documents and master plans were shown to them. LET DELHI POLCE (already short of staff) be not mis-utilised for such illegal meaningless ulterior motives of MCD and such others who have incited such executives of MCD;
Jai Shree Ram !!