Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

SUBHASH SHARMA   11 May 2010 at 12:55

GOODS DELIVERD IN DELHI BUT TO BE TRANSPORTED TO OTHER STATE

GOODS SOLD FROM DELHI AND CUSTOMER WHO BELONGS TO OTHER STATE TAKES THE DELIVERY IN DELHI AND PROVIDE C-FORM.
CAN WE TREAT THIS SALE AS A CENTRAL SALES TAX.

DEPARTMENT OF TRADE TAX, DELHI DOES NOT TREAT THIS SALE AS A CENTRAL SALES AND ALSO REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE C-FORM.

KINDLY ADVISE.

SUBHASH SHARMA
ADVOCATE
M-9891338895

Anonymous   11 May 2010 at 12:18

adultery

Whether the criminal proceeding can be initiated against the wife, who is living in adultery?

BRITTO   11 May 2010 at 12:16

Chennai HC ruling on public purpose land

CHENNAI H C IN JUDGEMENT ON 12.4.07 IN THE CASE FILED BY DEVI NAGAR RESIDENTS, COIAMBATORE HAS RULED THAT THE LAND ALLOTED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE CANNOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS RESERVED. I PURCHASED A 2400 SQ.FT LAND APPROVED BY CMDA, RESERVED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE IN 1998 BUT IT IS CLEARLY MENTIONED IN THE APPROVAL GIVEN BY THE CMDA THAT THE SAID LAND IF NOT TAKEN BY THE GOVT. WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL, COULD BE SOLD BY THE PROMOTER BUT SUCH LAND SHOULD BE USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE ONLY. KINDLY CLARIFY THE ABOVE POINT. WHETHER I CAN SELL THE LAND ?

I GOT REPLY FROM MR. RAJ KUMAR MAKKAD THAT I COULD SELL THE LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE. MR R R KRISHNA IS REQUESTED TO CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING.
SINCE THE CMDA HAS PERMITTED TO USE THE LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE ONLY AND I BELIEVED IT AND PURCHASED. CAN I SELL THE LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE?. MANY PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY CONSTRUCTED HOUSES ON SUCH LAND AFTER OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM THE LOCAL BODY PRIOR TO THIS JUDGEMENT. IN WHAT WAY THIS JUDGEMENT AFFECTS PEOPLE LIKE ME AND THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE ALREADY CONSTRUCTED HOUSES ON SUCH LAND?

Rajesh B Shah   11 May 2010 at 12:16

Information Technology

Dear Sir, a minor has done child pornography and the police has filed complain against him. There is no any other crime and this was done in school students group. More than 12 students were together but the computer was used from the residence of minor and there fore their is a charged of pornography under information technology act. The student is bright in his study and through out his career is above 85%. What can be the defence to come out from this issue.

pratik   11 May 2010 at 11:54

High Court & Supreme Court.

Question: Two conflicting decision of diff HC (High Court) one is of single bench while other is of db of diff HC which is to follow?

Answer: Single bench decision of the HC of the same state has got binding effect than larger bench decision of HC of different state. Single Bench decision of the HC is more binding on that state than the db decision of HC of some other state.

As per which act or section the abovementioned answer is right pls tell me or any case laws. Is it applicable to appeallable tribunal & supreme court.

Any case laws .

Thanking U All Learned Members in advance.

Anonymous   11 May 2010 at 11:50

divorce and harresment

i have married 2004 but my wife leave my home after 6 to 7 month.we are try so many times for that she come back my home but she refused.2007 she do 125 and 498a against me and my enosent family.still now i pay all amount as a court order.continue they are harres me and my family.demand unnessary amount.2010 i do divorce file ground of crualty.They are treat us that they r do more case.I have so many prove that 498a is a false.i want to know that what i am doing now if they are do some case like 420 etc ?is it possible to do 128 for false 498a or maan hani daba ?please advice me.

Anil Goel   11 May 2010 at 11:28

rate of tax

hello expert............
plz tell me the rate of vat on weighing scale and weigh bridge and on its related parts under Punjab VAT Act, 2005.
thanx

prashant chaturvedi   11 May 2010 at 11:26

adoption

a person who is insolvant can adopt a child under adoption act?

Bhavin   11 May 2010 at 10:52

VAT on property before April 2010

I have registered my house before 1st April 2010. My builder has charged me 5% VAT on the flat value. According to what I have read and found out from friends, there is a bombay high court stay on 5% VAT charged before april 2010. Is there any notification that we have to pay this VAT ? Is there any law protecting the consumers in such a case ? I need help urgently. Thanks.

Anonymous   11 May 2010 at 10:26

Time frame for filing Contempt of Court in Civil Suit

When can contempt of Court Order be filed? Within what time frame since judgement can it be filed?

Whether it can be filed filed after 5Years with the proff?

Please arrange to give me case reference and the judgement by any superior courts.