Anonymous
15 May 2010 at 22:35
can anybody give some decions or judgements of supreme court of India in connection to retrospective effect of domestic violence act of 2005.how can be the said act has retrospective effect when act itself is silent on it?
Prasant Satpathy,Bhubaneswar.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
15 May 2010 at 22:19
Dear Sir,
1. I want to marry a girl but before marriage I want to transfer in F.D or want to give Rs 2 Lakhs to the bride for showing explicitly the safety proof of her life & living-hood in future if something mishap will occur to me after marriage.
2. Will the deduction of income tax will be deducted on Rs 2 Lakhs from assessee
OR
there is some other way to transfer the money on her name so that I will have exempted for paying any income tax amount on the 2 lakhs amount before marriage will be consummated?
3. What is the shrewd way to give the aforesaid amount to her without any income tax deductions before marriage?
Surrender K Singal
15 May 2010 at 20:15
How does it matter if the testator signs in Hindi while his / her Will is type written in English, while being duly registered.
Why is it necessary to wait for the probate even for Delhi properties being in the estate comprising of other properties in other metros?
Why can't the Bar Association or Bar Council suggest / recommend doing away with requirement of probate so as to bring the law at par as prevalent in smaller cities and towns, at least for registered Wills to save our judiciary from over-piling of Petitions?
Any aggrieved person can always take legal recourse to assert his claim and number of such suits may be only a fraction of the total probate cases pending / adding on in Indian Courts..
Surrender K Singal
15 May 2010 at 20:14
How does it matter if the testator signs in Hindi while his / her Will is type written in English, while being duly registered.
Why is it necessary to wait for the probate even for Delhi properties being in the estate comprising of other properties in other metros?
Why can't the Bar Association or Bar Council suggest / recommend doing away with requirement of probate so as to bring the law at par as prevalent in smaller cities and towns, at least for registered Wills to save our judiciary from over-piling of Petitions?
Any aggrieved person can always take legal recourse to assert his claim and number of such suits may be only a fraction of the total probate cases pending / adding on in Indian Courts..
yogesh
15 May 2010 at 20:04
Dear Experts,
I have filed an application under provisions of Hindu Marriage Act and I have seen the daily orders of the hon'ble court which it has stated that" Notice of the petition be issued to the respondent on filing of PF /
RC to be filed on behalf of the petitioner, process returnable for the date...."
Please inform whether Applicant/petitioner has to do the process fees service to the respondent ?
Please inform whether Hon'ble court doesn't have to serve the notice to the respondent as some courts do send the notice at the time of Admission?
Please inform what will be the procedure for Process fees service at New Delhi District courts?
Anonymous
15 May 2010 at 19:54
PPF maturity of deceased father's HUF having been handed over to one of the coparceners without others' consent by a Nationalised Bank, has since been allowed to be misappropriated by another Nationalised Bank where the self-styled Karta manipulated to open and operate Bank Accounts in the name of our father's HUF. Though required to obtain the mandatory Form F303 as declaration from all coparceners with their signatures/identity, the erring Bank has conveniently overlooked their Bank's own norms and allowed withdrawal of lakhs of Rupees worth of Deposits to only one of the coparceners. How and Who could be proceeded against for such misappropriation of HUF funds?
Anonymous
15 May 2010 at 19:52
PPF maturity of deceased father's HUF having been handed over to one of the coparceners without others' consent by a Nationalised Bank, has since been allowed to be misappropriated by another Nationalised Bank where the self-styled Karta manipulated to open and operate Bank Accounts in the name of our father's HUF. Though required to obtain the mandatory Form F303 as declaration from all coparceners with their signatures/identity, the erring Bank has conveniently overlooked their Bank's own norms and allowed withdrawal of lakhs of Rupees worth of Deposits to only one of the coparceners. How and Who could be proceeded against for such misappropriation of HUF funds?
Anonymous
15 May 2010 at 19:50
PPF maturity of deceased father's HUF having been handed over to one of the coparceners without others' consent by a Nationalised Bank, has since been allowed to be misappropriated by another Nationalised Bank where the self-styled Karta manipulated to open and operate Bank Accounts in the name of our father's HUF. Though required to obtain the mandatory Form F303 as declaration from all coparceners with their signatures/identity, the erring Bank has conveniently overlooked their Bank's own norms and allowed withdrawal of lakhs of Rupees worth of Deposits to only one of the coparceners. How and Who could be proceeded against for such misappropriation of HUF funds?
JAYAKUMAR
15 May 2010 at 19:04
Ok thanks for instant respone..
Would like to give some more clarity on my question..
We are buying the property from a muslim women(herein called Vendor) who got this property(with all rights) through a settlement from her father who self-acquired this property.
Vendor has 1 sister and 2 brothers who were not included in the settlement, which she got from her father (CONCERN #1).
And Vendor has 1 son(major) and 1 daughter(minor) (daugher being minor is my CONCERN #2, as she may create dispute on this property later saying she has right on her grand father's property)
Given this, will you still say that I don't have to worry about these two concerns e and proceed with buying the property. Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Have a question about Signature on the registered document
My father has got a property through Family partition deed, and in that deed everyone else in the family also got a property and signed the deed.
In the family partition deed (Registered Document) my father name mentioned as (family initial + His father initial + His name) (ex: R.T.Kesavan where R is family initial, T is Kesavan's initial) but my father had put the signature with single intitial only (i.e. T. Kesavan) in that family partition deed, he usually puts the signature like this only.
Will this create any problem in the future? If yes, what remedy measures we need to take. Please advise.