Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 15:27
Hi,
I am purchasing a plot alloted by the greater noida authority for making house.
Allotee of the plot shifted to US and now he is giving Power of
Attorney (POA) to his relative in delhi to process deal.
Queries
1.)Please suggest what precautions needs to be taken to avoid any inconvenience later( like ownership issue) as i am dealing with POA by NRI.
2.)Is there any way to verify POA authenticity ?
RAMESH KUMAR VERMA
26 May 2010 at 15:14
DEAR SIR,
WILL YOU TELL THAT "BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA" OCCURS IN RTI ACT, 2005 OR EXCLUDE ALTHOUGH IT IS A GOVERNMENT BODY
YOUR REPLY IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED.
THX
RAMESH KUMAR VERMA
26 May 2010 at 15:03
DEAR SIR,
WILL YOU TELL THAT "BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA" OCCURS IN RTI ACT, 2005 OR EXCLUDE ALTHOUGH IT IS A GOVERNMENT BODY
YOUR REPLY IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED.
THX
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 14:45
One of our client is going for winding up of the company. It is voluntary winding up by the members. Major problem is there are 5 directors of which 3 are foreign national and 2 are Indian National in the company. But at the time of filing DIN 2 & 3 by the Company it has filed only for 4 directors. The one director left with out any DIN is Indian National having no DIN 1 up to now and at present he is settled in foreign country a year back. He is not co operating for filing DIN 1 in his name. Can we mention that the office of the so called director has been vacant under section 283 of the companies act for not attending 3 boar meetings. If so there is any requirement of filing any document with ROC for such vacation Or there are any alternative methods. If so please suggest the same at the earliest along with the checklist for complying with requirements of ROC for winding up of the company.
The company was formed in the Year 2002.
Is the any simplified exit scheme (SES) for the Year 2010 if so pls intimate.
Pls resolve the query at the earliest.
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 12:46
If a first husband of a woman dies and then she marries an another man whose wife died and then again her second husband also dies then does this woman have share in the property of her second husband?
She doesnt have children from second husband whereas her second husband has left behind a son from her first wife.
Whether son or wife who is the owner of a property of a died man? There is a conflict in a relationship of the son and wife of a expired man.
All of them belong to the Indian Muslim family.
Kindly suggest something.
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 12:41
I have paid full settlement amount in part as decided by the bank's representative.I paid the final balance amount in cash against the receipt of full & final settlement letter after confirming with that representative. Thereafter I stop receiving monthly statement & also there was no correspondence from bank. But after 6 months I receive a call asking for part amount which was paid before final payment was made. I ask for a written letter for demanding this balance amount. Even after SIX YEARS & till today they never send me a written letter nor any representative visited my address, demanding to pay that balance amount. I use to receive only phone calls, that too once in a year for making payment. I would always request them to sent me a letter.But till date they have not send. How do I stop this matter. Please reply.
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 12:16
Dear All,
a company cleared goods after payment of central excise duty to an SEZ units. because bill of exports not provided by SEZ units at the time of removal the goods.
now can consigner file rebate claim for duty amount and it is permissable or not.
thanks,
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 12:16
Dear sir,
My client had given his vehicle to the service centre for the whole routine check up viz. Oil Change, Water Pump Change, Hand Brake Assy. Change, Belts Change etc. Next date the officer from service centre informed my client that the whole routine check up had been done and my cleint can take his vehicle from his service centre.
My cleint after paying the bill amount of Rs. 19,630/- took away his vehicle.
My client had hardly driven his vehicle around 5-8 k.m. away from the service centre, my cleint was shocked and surprised that vehicle which was gone through the whole routine check up was suddenly stopped. Hence my client immediately called the service centre who in turn informed my client that there may be some silly problem and the same shall be repaired properly,
On next day Mr. Aditya from service centre conflicted/refuted his earlier statement and informed my celint that the engine of the vehicle has been ceased and the gas kit has to be change. My cleint after hearing the statement of Mr. Aditya, accompanied the local mechanic to the service centre, where after check up in front of Mr. Aditya it was found that the service centre had forgotten to put the oil in the engine and as a result of which the engine of the vehicle was ceased. even the local mechanic had vouched that the mischief is played by the service centre and is ready to give his affidavit to that effect.
even after inquiry it was found by my client that pre delivery inspection was not carried by the service centre and the vehicle was delivered with out PDI. what really surprised my cleint, when the verbal argument was going on for not putting the oil in the engine and damage occurred due to negligence/ carelessness of the staff of the service centre, the staff from the service centre came with five liter oil canister and put the oil in the engine.
My cleint tried to resolve this dispute peacefully with the seniors and with Mr. Karnik-Manager of service centre, but all his efforts went into vein.
hence my cleint was compelled by give Advocate notice dated 22.02.2010 to the service centre, calling upon “To repair the ceased/damage engine caused to my client’s car with in 48 hours from the receipt of the notice, other wise the repair shall be made by my client from other service center and the cost/expenses caused /incurred to my client will compensated by you through appropriate forum/court”.
After in compliance of legal notice Mr. Karnik –Manager from the service centre orally accepted the fault/blunder committed by the service centre and carried out repairs of the said vehicle.
Despite acceptance of fault committed by Mr. Karnik-Manager of service centre and assurances from General Motors India Pvt. Ltd., to look in to the matter seriously, the vehicle of my cleint was illegally seized and detained for more than 15 days for not meeting the illegal demands of Rs. 76,650/- imposed on my cleint.
My cleint to save him from unnecessary harassment and mental agony and also to protect his car, paid amount of Rs. 76,650/- which he had paid under protest, because the service centre was not ready to release the vehicle unless payment of Rs. 76,650- paid to the service centre.
even after payment of Rs. 76,650/- under protest, vehicle of the Complainant was not repaired properly, the vehicle of the Complainant was push-start, even the starter of the vehicle was burnt and the right side mirror was stolen, for which my cleint raised an objection, Mr. Aditya from the service center did not pay any head to my cleint objection and told my cleint “yeha se gadi jaldi leke jao nahi to ek ek part chori ho jayeja”.
Sir, My client had instructed me to file consumer complaint, kindly guide me what should be my ground and how to fight out the case.
Thanking you,
Adv. Santosh Thakur
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 11:56
A case is filed in consumer forum against the Builder and CHS, jointly holding them responsible for deficiency in service, since the CHS is not considering membership, and the CHS is formed with cooperation of the Builderg.Pending hearing, in response to the compaint from the Applicant, the Registrar CS, issues order in favour of the Applicant for granting membership. The CHS, in w/a has already stated that they need such a permission, but have not kept to their words and have not responded to the said order and the matter is now posted for oral arguments.
As this is a subsequent development, after filing of the Complaint,the experts may please guide as to how to putforth this before hon'ble forum.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138
I had given goods to accused no. 2 who is the proprietor of a firm. Accused no. 1 issued a personal cheque to discharge the payment. Are both accused liable under section 138 ?