Vicky kamal Maurya
26 May 2010 at 21:49
My great grand father served in the Indian Army before independence and he went to war with japan and he deposited the land documents with patwari.
Later in 1963 my grand father transfered it to his name but at the time of land marking he was attacked by the local villagers on site.
He ran for his life and did not return to see it again.
He would also not let us go to see the land etc.
He died two years back and we found in his diary name of the generation on which land is registered.
Also that the land in old times was in ballamgarh of gurgaon village rasulpur.
Now after searching on www.jamabandi.nic.in
I found that the land is now in Faridabad -Palwal- Rasulpur.
I need help and suggestion from experts how to get it? specially when jamabandi.nic.in is not able provide details of faridabad.
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 21:30
Respected Sir,
A person intended to purchase a whole plot, Since he was wkg. outside, so he entrusted a friend of him to get it registered. Due to wrong measurement the area of the plot registered is smaller than the actual. But the Description and boundary mentioned is correct. Possession too was transferred. Also in the recital portion intention of both parties are clearly mentioned. Consideration too was paid for the whole area of the plot. Now plz. suggest how it will get corrected? On contacting the vendor , he is denying for correction, rather claiming the rest of the land. Local advocates are suggesting to go for declaration suit. Does description/boundary and recital portion is significant or any role has to play in this context?
Thanks to all.
ASHIF HUSSAIN
26 May 2010 at 21:24
dear sir,
please tell me witch amount is payeble in court (courtfee) for exucute award in district court u/s 36 arbitration act.
Thanks & Regards
Ashif Hussain
Neeraj Kaushal
26 May 2010 at 21:17
original counsel out of station , case fixed for consideration on stay and for filing written statement , whether vice counsel is entitled for a date for consideration and filing written statement as per law , is there any section or order in C.P.C or citation for adjournment , help me for this matter ,
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 21:14
hello,
i'm actually confused as to wat career option i shud go for.
i am a BBA graduate(2010),i also appeared for my ca inter this may...i appeared for exams last year as well but cudnt make it...i'm appearing for law entrances as well...do u to the increase in uncertainity level in CA my parents have adviced me to do law...
wat shud i finally decide on doing?
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 20:47
Secretary has filed a police complaint against 5 members of managing committee of a trust for fabricating receipt books & forsenic lab report proves it.
The PSI has threaten the complainer to be arrested.
A request letter has been forwarded to CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA to look into the matter so justice prevails.
Instead of all the proceedings police has made the cmplainer as an accuse.
R P BANSAL
26 May 2010 at 20:40
As per Section 4(1) of The Payment of Gratuity Act an Employee has to be in service for 5 years Continuous Service to become eligible for Gratuity.
The Section 2A. Definition of Contineous service " An employee is deemed to be conineous service for one year if in the said period of One year he worked for more than 240 days (section 2A.(2)(a)(ii))
Thus if an employee has completed fully 4 years and in the fifth year he has worked for 265 days , please advise as per above definition of Contineous Service for one year (more than 240 days in a period of one year)the employee has completed 5 years Contineous Service to become eligible for Gratuity.
Also please tell the employee has Worked for 4 years 265 days (4 years 9 months) and he was also paid 3 months salary in liew of 'Notice Period' for termination of service, thus total period becomes 4 years + 265 days + 90 days(Notice salary) weather he qualify to get Gratuity under Gratuity Act,
The case Relates with Employer Reliancr Communications Limited (Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group) and my self who has Joined Reliance Communications on repeated persuations my Mukesh Ambani to join his Telecom Service by taking voluntary retirement from Senior Administrator Grade (Dy. Dir General or Jt. Sec. to Govt of India, Department of Telecom (DoT) Service, worked with them for 4 years 265 days, Anil took over from Mukesh the telecom service and terminated service of person like me in most inhuman ands unparliamentry and disrepctfull manner and even do not wish to pay the legally and legtimately entitled dues.
Kindly advise me,
Regards
R.P.Bansal
puneet saxena
26 May 2010 at 20:31
Respected Sir/Madam
"If govt. tries to compare the candidates(open for govt. jobs) on non-comparable ground then is it against the article 16 of indian constitution that guarantee equal opportunity in all govt. jobs?"
the whole matter is as follows
UP government has started entrance process for basic teacher training(BTC) for 17800 seats from 16 may 2010(source Amar Ujala News Paper Dated-16 May 2010).candidates will be selected on the basis of merit( marks obtained in 10th,12th and in graduation).one candidates can apply for one district only.for detail please see amar ujala news paper dated 16 may 2010. last date for submitting form is 8th june.
Besides it the UP govt has taken decision to select the PGT/TGT teacher on the basis of merit.(academic score)
But i and a lot of people like me have following objections.
1.Different boards/universities candidate will apply for BTC. how can we compare different board/university students on the basis of their marks. each board or university has different syllabus,different marking pattern.this can be easily proved by seeing past results,boards guideline for evaluation and by seeing syllabus of the same class. for example- a up board student of class twelve has combined syllabus for eleventh and twelfth class and has to prepare both year syllabus for 12th board exam while CBSE student has different syllabus for 11th and 12th.
2. my second objection is students of different streams of the same board/university or different board/university and of same stream but with different subjects can not be compared. some subjects are more scoring than others.this can be easily seen by checking past record. for example students who have home science, music etc subjects will get higher marks than a economics' s student marks. some subjects have practical components and the students who have practical subjects easily get higher marks in practical component.
3.professional courses can not be compared with academic courses.professional courses has two types of evaluation. first internal and second- university based exam evaluation. in internal marking system most of the students easily get 80 to 100% marks. so a BCA ,BBA student can not be compared with a B.A. student whose evaluation is done only on the basis of university exam.
4-the student of same board or different board/university passing in different years can not be compared.education sector is changing at very fast pace. every year something new has been added and the facilities ,teacher method , evaluation method, syllabus and the government also are changing.so we can see the result of these changes on the marks of the students.
_ In up board when i passed the high school in 1999 , the Kalyan Singh led BJP government was there.CM kalyan Singh introduced nakal adyadesh(ordinance) .if any body found copying would had to go to jail. that year highschool result was only 29%.
_ Up to1999 there was a combined syllabus for 9th and 10th and 10th student had to prepare for both year syllabus for 10th exam.the marking pattern has also changed. in earlier time in maths and science no marks were given if the answer is wrong but now step marking is done and marks is given for right steps without considering answer is wrong or right.
_now in UP nakal mafia is on high. there are several instances of paper leaks, group copying etc.(read editorial in amar ujala dated 16 may 2010)
_besides these there are varying infrastructure in villages, small cities and big cities that affect the mark securing ability of the students in their early stage of education.but they are in no ways less intelligent for the other students who are securing more marks.
5.there is a provision of 50% parallel reservation for women.the net effect is that there is only 25% seats are available unreserved.it is opposed to various courts decision in which court stated that total reservation should not exceed 50% upper cap.i am not opposed to the women reservation but excess of everything is bad because it will create social imbalance in society and we all of us has to face the bad effects of it.
please place your views in detail.i want to file a PIL against UP govt. order because govt. is trying to compare the candidates on non-comparable ground that is against the article 16 of indian constitution that guarantee equal opportunity in all govt. jobs.The govt. rightly has the power to set the criteria but that should be reasonable.The elected govt. should work according to declared policy not arbitrarily.the govt should set the policy when she will conduct entrance exam or when she will make selection according to merit based on academic score.
i sent similar letter to NCTE(national council for teachers education) and ncte's reply is as follows
"This is in response to your e-mail dt. 17.05.2010 in connection with
entrance test going to be conducted by Govt. of Uttar Pradesh for
admission to BTC Course. You have serious objections about the criteria
being adopted by Govt. of UP, though this matter pertains to State
Government however, as per NCTE Regulation 2009 the admission shall be
made on merit on the basis of marks obtained in qualifying examination and
/ or any other selection process as per the policy of State Govt. / UT
Admn. In view of this stipulation, the State Govt. of UP has adopted any
of such pattern NCTE treats it compliance of NCTE Regulation 2009.
(Dr. S.K.Chauhan)
Programme Officer
NCTE
"
i am an unemployed youth and don't have sufficient resources to file a PIL. can you help me because it's not a matter of single person .it's going to affects lacs of people.
looking forward to your comments.
puneet saxena
9286671588
puneetsaxena_2009@rediffamil.com
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 18:50
Dear Sir,
I am staying in joint family including my mother & brother. We both brother
are sataying in pune for job purpose &. My mother is widow she is
staying with my grandemother & my uncles they are married.
My uncles are abussing & harrashing my mother. We have good lands & property
at our village & they wants to capture that.We have a proper will were the property divided on the name of my 2 uncle & me (me include me mother & my brother)
request to answer the question.
1. Can I file case ugainst them for harrashing my mother & how can I make my case stronger.
2. Can I file a case for partation.
3.Today we are not getting any benifit out of that property so if any liabiality occure on the said property will it binde to my share also.
Finally I want partation. Request to advice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
personal loan
Hello,
I had taken loan form MNC bank in 2005 80,000/, 10 months i pain the EMI, after that i lost my job and unable to pay the loan.after some time i changed the address and phone numbers, i have no contacts with them. recently i joined one company which gave me the same bank salary Accout. after few months, they deducted some money from my Accoubt stating that u had taken loan from our bank in 2005 towards that amout they some money,what should i do right now, because i had given my address and phone number.
If i need to pay the amount or make settlement how much money i need to pay like the amount i have taken or any interest.
please guide me,it's urgent.
Regards