Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 23:43
iam markandeya raju.....please let me know if i can do my intenship... iam a law student studying in university college of law ou...... hyderabad... andhra pradesh
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 23:31
i wanted to know something about analogous hearing of cases when the subject matter of two or more parties is same. besides i need a briefing on non-joinder and mis-joinder of parties...
thanks
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 23:13
I am having ancestral property. I have two sisters. There is no any partition between us. After the death of my father, my name has been mutated in Record of Rights. Then I was minor and my mother was minor guardian. After majority, guardian is not on records 27 years ago. My sisters are married and residing happily with their families.
I approached a Bank for loan. After studying my case, bank advocate given opinion that, my title is not clear because of sisters. He told that, as per newly amended HIndu Law, sisters also got share in property and hence mortgage cannot be created without the consent of my sisters. He told that, because there is no relinquishment deed or partition deed, their claim exists. My sisters are married before 20 yrs.
Please clarify.
pratik
09 July 2010 at 22:25
Explain me the hole section because i am not able to understand the meaning of it detail so pls expalin me if possible aslo with the example(S).
1) what do u mean by concurrent powers as per the consitution of india, 1949 with the example.
2)Section 57. Facts of which Court must take judicial notice - The Court shall take judicial notice of the following
facts;
1. All laws in force in the territory of India;
2. All public Acts passed or hereafter to be passed by Parliament of United Kingdom, and all local and personal
Acts directed by Parliament of the United Kingdom to be judicially noticed;
3. Articles of War for the Indian Army, Navy of Air force;
4. The course of proceeding of parliament of the United Kingdom, of the Constituent Assembly of India, of
Parliament and of the Legislature established under any law for the time being in force in Province or in the
States;
5. The accession and the sign manual of the Sovereign for the time being of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland;
6. All seals of which English Courts take judicial notice; the seals of all the Courts in India and of all Courts
out of India established by the authority of the Central Government or the Crown representative; the seals off
Court of Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction and of Notaries Public and all seals which any person is authorized
to use by the Constitution or an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom or an Act or Regulation having the force
of law in India;
7. The accession to office, names, titles, functions and signatures of the persons filling for the time being any
public office in any state, if the fact of their appointment to such office is notified in any official Gazette;
8. The existence, title and national flag of every State or Sovereign recognized by the Government of India;
9. The divisions of time, the geographical divisions of the world, and public festivals, facts and holidays
notified in the Official Gazette;
10. The territories under the dominion of the Government of India;
11. The commencement, continuance and termination of hostilities between the Government of India and any other
State or body of persons;
12. The names of the members and officers of the Court, and of their deputies and subordinate officers and
assistants and also of all officers acting in execution of its process, and of all advocates, attorneys, proctors,
vakils, pleaders and other persons authorized by law to appear or act before it;
13. The rule of the road on lad or at sea.
In all these cases, and also on all matters of public history, literature, science or art, the Court may report
for its aid to appropriate books or documents of reference.
If the Court is called upon by any person to take judicial notice of any fact it may refuse to do so unless and
until such person produces any such book or document as it may consider necessary to enable it to do so.
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:38
what if a person issues a cheque but does not have a bank account at the time of making it.. will it come under 138 n.i.a.?? please reply in detail??
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:35
what section will be applied on a person who have given the cheque to someone but before the date he has closed his account ?? will it come under 138 n.i.a. or cheating??reply asap??
chandra shakher joshi
09 July 2010 at 21:35
dear members,
Ugc is organizing NET examination in June and Dec. every year, since many years for lecturer ship. There was no provision of negative marketing. In the Net Examinations of Dec.2009 UGC imposed condition of negative marking in paper 1 and 2. Now in recent notification from UGC the condition of negative marking has been vaved from NET examination of June 2010. Thus the condition of negative marking was made applicable for the candidates appeared in Dec.2009 Examination.
My daughter appeared in the NET examination of Dec.2009 and she was declared unsuccessful for only 1 number in paper 1 and 2. If the condition was not made applicable for Examination of Dec.2009 she would have been cleared it.
This is clear cut case of unequal opportunity in the eyes of constitution as no equity has been maintained.
Please guide me what I have to de and take legal steps. I have already written a letter to UGC for reconsideration of the matter and lifting condition of negative marking from all examinations and re announcing the result accordingly.
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:20
where to find format for all legal documents in this site.??.plz reply asap
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:14
Hi,
This is in reference to a labour dispute 15 old which my mother is pursuing.
The Judge is asking for bribe to send the case for reward ( in gazette).He is going to retire in another two months, he has written in our case file " lets case be resolved for reward ,labour present but management absent"
Kindly suggest what to do in this regard
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Property Matter.
Dear Ld Friends,
I may seek your advise on the following :
A has a family (wife and a son)
A has 3 brothers and 3 sisters.
A's father passed away and left the Ancestral House Property, which may be approx. 1000 sq. ft. including all the three floors.
A's mother is taking care of the property.
A is not comfortable to stay in the house due to variuous inconveniences by his family members.
Query
1. Whether A has eligibility to file suit for PROPERTY PARTITION or claim amount of his share ?
2. Is it legally permissible, when all the other family members are not desired either to split the property or sell the property ?
3. Whether A's three sisters are eligible to have a share in the property, even they all were married before 1994 ?
I shall wait for your guidance on the matter.