Reshma
15 July 2010 at 20:23
We need to engage the services of an expert who has dealt with MACT cases before.
All the ground work and papers have been prepared already - we just need someone who will take the case seriously and give it due time and attention.
If interested please contact via this forum and we can take it further.
Thanks
Ms. R P Singh
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 20:08
SHRAVAN
AA [edit]
[edit photo]
[ Scorecard : 24]
I OWNED A PROPERTY WHICH WAS SOLD BY SOME ONE BY DUPLICATE AGREEMENT ON MY NAME.
I HAD A CASE PENDING IN COURT THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT MADE BY ME SO KINDLY TO CANCELL THE AGREEMENT UNDER 135D NOTICE. INSPITE OF MATTEER PENDING IN COURT THE ENTRY WAS VERIFIED BY MAMLATDAR
KINDLY HELP ME TO FIND ANY JUDGEMENT TO CANCELL SUCH ENTRY
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 19:54
R/sir, i had a query that whether Advocate is liable to pay professional tax or not.
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 19:38
The people who are just encroaching roads,creating trouble for traffic by their roadside Rehri,Dhaba,Khokha--they have been given Tay-Bazari shops on the footpaths of busy roads/market of Delhi-- ignoring the fundamental rights of the pedestrians to walk on the footpaths,ignoring that these Tay Bazar shops are jeopardizing whole traffic system,ignoring that such shops are eating the business of Legal/authorized shops which have been purchased after paying Lakhs/Crores of Rupees.
How on earth Delhi/Indian Govt. allow almost a legal status to such Tay -Bazari shops.
If some one misused public land --should he be punished or allotted another piece of land just because he was misusing that piece of land for years ?
How to get rid of all such Tay-Bazari shops legally ?
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 18:59
Banker has returned the cheque with instructions to present it again. wheather it is bouncing of cheque and the the Bank is liable for damages. Any case law in support of the bank.
I have to protect the banker in a law suit on the plea that the return of the cheque for presentation again is not the bouncing of the cheque and the Bank is not liable to the damages on this count
Jainodin shaikh
15 July 2010 at 18:46
Hi!
I am a member of Jalgaon District Bar Association. I am running free sms facility for members of Jalgaon Bar Association.
I have sent an sms desclosing that the executive body of Jalgaon Bar Association has acted against resulution passed by Jalgaon Bar Association itself.
Now the president of our bar association and other are threatening me that they are going to expel me from bar association and wants me to stop sms facility which is in fact highly appreciated by almost all members of our bar; because they are getting benefit of this sms facility (I am providing through sms advance information regardimg the LEAVE of judges in Jalgaon district).
I want some clarification/help from you on fallowing points:
Whether bar association has right to expel me from the association?
What remedy is available to a lawyers is expelled from bar association without valid reasons?
What is the role of state bar council in this type of matters.
Please help me by providing your valuable guidance.
Thanking you!
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 18:40
Now that all Forms relating to Company Formation are filed electronically, is there a need for physical submission of MOA & AOA at ROC and vetting thereof even though these are required to be attached to eForm 1?
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 18:32
A case of cheque bouncing worth Rs.one lakh is being fought. The petitioner says that the cheque was given under a friendly loan,loan was not returned, so cheque was presented and got bounced hence 138 is applicable.
The opponent advocate knowingly or unknowingly never raised the question that whether the petitioner is a money lender and possess a valid license of money lending,he never appealed to the court to get the age of writing checked of signature and date and amount etc.He never appealed that there is a ruling of Bombay High court that cases of Post dated cheques of loans do not fall in 138.
Ultimately petitioner won the case.
Now it is almost impossible that the judge did not know all these questions/appeals which should have been raised by the respondent's advocate but which were never raised.
My query --is this justice that judge does not interfere knowing that a case is being lost just because of mistakes of an advocate
Can't in the end judge himself raise/suggests the questions/appeals left by both the parties ?
And if he does not do that,is this justice?
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 18:12
Iam a housing loan customer of ICICI bank since July 2006 in chennai and after availing the housing loan on June 2006 after the disbursement my EMI started from July 2006 .The head of Regional manager in chennai had issued an instruction 12.4.2008 to the builder with a copy marked to me, not to give the possession of the flat which has been completed on the pretext of non availability of the sale deed. After your guidance i moved the state consumer forum on September 2008 and the fact is the case is still pending to dispose, meantime the builder had given the possession to the other co-owners during July 2008 and an association had been formed and the association had put a name board effecting the names of the owners beside the flat numbers in which my name also appears beside my flat number . On 23.2.09 the name was changed to be read as ''Ref.ICICI Bank'' as this flat belongs to ICICI Bank “beside to my flat number and again after getting your guidance i started writing the complaints to the bank requesting them to remove the name board till August 2009. When nothing came through i informed the bank and suspended the EMI from August 2009. After this the bank came forward for discussion and everytime in the discussion they will insist me to withdraw the case first and till today had taken place including the CONCILATION where i apprised everything along with the documentary evidence and till now the concilator had not given any verdict. As so yeaterday ie 13.7.2010 i received a notice under the SARFAESI ACT where as they had informed me that all my loan had been recalled and iam due and liable.As per the consumer case,the bank had filed their vakalath in the consumer forum only this month and now it has been posted for the version of the bank and the builder had already filed his vakalath but had not filed the version hence he was set exparte.Please guide me what i have to do at this juncture?...
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
IPC337
HAI SIR GOOD EVENING ,
THIS ISN KUMAR SWAMY MY MOTHER MET AN ACCIDENT ACROSS THE ROAD BY MOTER CYCLE PERSON ON THE MAIN ROAD.SHE FACED LOT OF DAMAGES IN HER'S BODY AND BROKEN HER RIGHT LEG AT TWO PLACES ALSO. THAN AFTER. I WENT TO THE POLICE STATION AND PUT A COMPLAINT ON THE ACCUSE, BUT THE POLICE'S PUT A CASE US 337.BUT DOCTORS SAID TO ME. SHE IS IN VERY HARRABLE SITUATION. NOW IAM NOT BELIVE THE POLICE. WHAT CAN I DO. AND WHICH SECTION IS THE STRONG ON THIS SITUATION.
THANKING YOU SIR
CH. KUMAR SWAMY MBA,{LLB}