Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 14:48
can the pecuniary jurisdiction of a high court exceed rs. 10 lakh under any circumstance? if there are two defendants to a suit, can the plaintiff claim rs. 10 lakh individually from both the defendants?
please cite the authority too
Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 14:03
i need of judgement on the transparency of the examination or transparency in the interview.
hussain
29 July 2010 at 13:24
sir
My client as not filed return for the financial year 2008-09 upto till date and my client wants to file return now its possible to file now and there is no tax liabilty and T.D.S as been deducted from L.I.C.Please sugges me so that i can file.
Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 13:22
Dear Sirs,
Five from the family had collectively appointed a lawyer to plead on our behalf till the last pleading for Rs.35,000=00.
The contract was in black and white with all five signing on the lawyers letterhead, the copy of which is with us.
Midway due to difference of opinion we split 3:2. When the two of us appointed another lawyer after being granted permission by the judge, this lawyer asked for Rs.40,000 from the two of us, as settlement against fees i.e., Rs.20,000=00 each, instead of Rs.7000=00 each as per the earlier ratio in the contract when all five were together.
On record the lawyer has already been paid Rs.10,000=00 as token initially, where our contribution in the token amount was Rs.4000=00 i.e., Rs.2000=00 each.
The lawyer refused to grant the NOC if we did not coughed up the demanded amount. We had no choice but to pay up and take the NOC in return.
We are very disapointed by the lawyers rude behavior and extracting extra money under coercion. Taking full advantage of the situation.
Please guide us for necessary legal action which the two of us intend to take against the lawyer, with copy to the bar council.
Regards/Khurshied
venky
29 July 2010 at 13:08
Dear Respected Sir
I was as driver in one of the MNC co for couple of years they said they will make permanent later as days gone they said to leave the organisation without any information when asked why they said your in contract basis so we no need to tell all the reason, fine i just want to know in which contract basis i was and even i filed case against the co, then in court itself they said he is contract so we cant make permanent...... i just want to know which contract basis i was,, and what can i do further how to proceed is there any chance of getting any compensation from the company please suggest me what should i do further
Rajesh
29 July 2010 at 12:59
I am Rajesh from Faridabad and staying in second floor of builders flat. Next to our plot is a private property of an individual and he also has two floors in his building. Our building has a double brick boundarywall in our own foundation and our neighbor has got their own foundation within their boundary. While building their first and second floors, they used our wall for the support rather erecting their own wall within their boundary. This way, he has encroached space from our flat. I am not sure whether our foundation takes up this extra load of this building! The families in the ground and first floor did not object to this as they do not have any rights for the roof rather they are not bothering about the foundation. As I was out of town, I could not object this while he was constructing the first and second floors. When talking to them, he said both we have single brick wall from the bottom. But from the ground floor, it is clearly visible that ours is a two brick wall and they have a separate wall within their boundary. In this way he occupied our outer boundary wall. Our builder is of no help to us to sort out this problem. Please advise how this problem can be solved.
Thanks and Regards
Rajesh
Ria
29 July 2010 at 12:08
Respected experts,
Can I seek exparte injunction in case of heavy uncontrolled water leakage in to my flat from the flat above mine.
As there was short circuit due to water seeping into my switch board.
Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 11:27
I am a retired semi govt.servant since Spt.2007. There was a regular TDS and I used to file returns, till I retired. However my income in the retiring year FY 07-08 did not exceed taxable limit.The pension was delayed in was paid in FY 08-09 anelow taxable income. However, the Retirments Funds invested matured in FY 09-10 and my income became taxable. I did not file returns for all these years, nor TDS was deducted. I want to pay tax with whatever penalty and to file returns. How to go about ? Pl. guide.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
removal of the governor
a writ petition is filed under article 32 as PIL in the wake of the removal of the governors of the state of UP and BIHAR by the president of India in the advice of Union Council. the petitioner has sought : (a)a direction to the union of INdia to produce entire files, documents and facts which form the basis of the order of the president of india, (b) a writ of certiorari, quashing the removals of the governors, (c) a writ of mandamus to respondents to allow the said four governors to complete their remaining term of five years.
(a) whether the petition is maintainable?
(b) what is the scope of "doctrine of pleasure"?
(c) what is the position of the governor under the constitution?
(d) whether there are any express or implied limitations/restrictions upon the power under article 156(1) of the constitution of india?
(e) whether the removal of the governors in the exercise of the doctrine of pleasure is open to judicial review?