vijayshettyonline
15 October 2026 at 18:42
already googled
already searched advo list in mubai high court
below is case status and only thing I have is name
plz help
Anonymous
14 October 2026 at 23:42
We have solar panels installed at our house. State of Punjab has started the payout for surplus solar energy units, for the first time, this financial year.
Is payout for surplus solar energy units produced by such solar panels, treated as taxable income, for residential consumers?
Sorry for being anonymous, but it is important.
Anonymous
13 October 2026 at 19:17
I have booked a flat with developer. The possesion was delayed. The building is now ready and the developer has given possession to other allotees. I demanded interest from the developer along with possession which the developer refused. I filed a complaint with RERA authority in April 2025 and was awarded a favourable order directing the developer to hand over possession along with interest by Oct 10th 2026 - 3 days ago. The developer did not offer the possession. I did not receive any communication from the developer. I understand I have to file execution petition. Can someone guide me with the process? I don't see any option in the MahaRERA website. I badly need the possession of the flat . I can wait for the interest part but need immediate possession. Can you someone guide me the options available to me and the process?
Amit Vatkar (Adilife Polyclini
12 October 2026 at 17:17
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Dr. Amit Vatkar, owner of a commercial unit in a registered mixed-use co-operative housing society comprising residential flats and commercial premises. I write to seek guidance from your office regarding the principles that should govern the levy and apportionment of maintenance charges where commercial and residential units differ substantially in terms of access, infrastructure, services, and amenities.
The commercial units in our society are situated separately from the residential wings and have independent access directly from the public road. Commercial owners do not enter through the society's main residential entrance or exit gates, nor do they have access to the residential wings.
Access to the residential wings is controlled through a fingerprint/biometric access system, effectively restricting commercial unit owners from entering these areas except where specifically authorised. Consequently, the residential lifts, internal lobbies, corridors, and other common areas within the residential wings are not available for use by commercial members. Since access itself is restricted, the residential lifts cannot be used by commercial unit owners.
The commercial portion has a separate lift serving only the Ground and First Floor commercial area. As required by the society after its formation, the commercial unit owners separately bear the Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) charges and electricity expenses of this lift.
Similarly, housekeeping and security arrangements for the commercial area are maintained separately. Commercial owners do not receive housekeeping or security services provided within the residential wings.
The society also has residential amenities such as a swimming pool, gymnasium, recreation room, podium, landscaped internal areas, and other facilities situated within the residential section. As a matter of policy and building layout, these amenities have not been provided to commercial shop owners and are not accessible to them.
Despite these differences, maintenance charges are levied upon commercial units using a percentage-based approach linked to the residential maintenance structure. In addition, certain charges, including water charges, appear to be determined solely on the basis that the premises are classified as "commercial", rather than on objective factors such as actual consumption, the size of the water connection, or the number of water inlets/outlets serving the premises.
In these circumstances, I respectfully seek guidance from your office on the following general principles:
1. Where commercial premises have separate access, separate infrastructure, separate maintenance arrangements, and restricted or no access to residential facilities, what are the principles that should govern the levy and apportionment of maintenance charges?
2. Should a co-operative housing society first identify and classify expenditure into:
- common expenses applicable to all members,
- residential-specific expenses, and
- commercial-specific expenses,
before determining the maintenance payable by each category of members?
3. Is it appropriate for a society to determine maintenance payable by commercial units merely by applying a fixed percentage of the residential maintenance, or should such charges be supported by a rational allocation of expenditure based upon the services, infrastructure, and amenities actually provided?
4. Are there any general principles, departmental guidelines, circulars, or administrative instructions followed by the Co-operation Department in such situations?
I wish to clarify that I am not seeking adjudication of any individual dispute through this representation. My objective is only to understand the correct legal and administrative approach so that such matters may be resolved fairly, transparently, and in accordance with the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, the Rules framed thereunder, and the applicable Model Bye-laws.
The issue appears to affect several mixed-use co-operative housing societies where commercial premises are structurally segregated from residential premises. An administrative clarification from your office would assist societies and members in uniformly applying the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and Model Bye-laws.
I would be sincerely grateful for any guidance, observations, or direction that your office may be able to provide. Such guidance would greatly assist both societies and commercial members in ensuring that maintenance charges are determined on fair, transparent, and legally sustainable principles.
Thank you for your valuable time and consideration. I look forward to your kind
Pushpalatha H
11 October 2026 at 12:54
1963: my father-in-law gave 6 cents to Kudikidappukars - sale deed. . 41 sq mtrs (about 1 cent) at back side is still in father's Thandaper, with survey number. It is NOT in the 1963 sale deed. - But since 1963, they were using that 41 sq mtrs + 3 cents Puramboke near river. - 6 cents partitioned: younger brother got front side (road), elder brother back side adjacent to river - Elder brother sold his 3 cents + house in 2026. His house is encroached into this 41 sq mtrs. - Now new buyer wants to regularize that 41 sq mtrs. Younger brother also wants it for keeping boat and nets. - Father-in law expired in 2012 - Is there any problem if we give a consent to new buyer for this 41 sq mtrs.
Veer Joon
07 October 2026 at 04:51
There is ancestral/coparcenary agricultural land in Haryana. A father was a the Karta of the ancestral land. He had 2 sons and 2 daughters. In January 2021, the father executed a registered Release Deed transferring the entire land to his two sons equally. The daughters were not asked for consent and did not sign the deed. The deed mentions that the daughters are married and do not need anything.
The daughter now wants to file a suit for:
Declaration of her coparcenary rights;
Declaration that the 2021 Release Deed is not binding on her share;
Partition and separate possession of her share.
My question is: Will the 3-year limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act apply because she is challenging the Release Deed, or can she get the 12-year limitation under Article 109/110 of the Limitation Act because this is ancestral/coparcenary property and she was excluded from her share? What is the Limitation Period in this Case?
Chetan
06 October 2026 at 11:53
Dear Experts
Greetings for the Day!
This discussion concerns an application for mutation attestation under Section 104(3) of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972.
The applicant, a non-occupancy tenant, faced delays when the Tehsildar required addresses for other parties, who had long since left the area. Despite a public notice (proclamation) in the Gazette stating proceedings would be ex-parte if no objections were filed, the court granted further extensions, raising concerns about procedural fairness and potential delays. The applicant seeks guidance on navigating the Tehsildar's court to secure justice and proprietary rights.
Is there a statutory provision to give/favor another month period to other party dispite of the fact it was clearly mentioned in the Govt. Gazette as under
...........matter shall be proceeded with ex-parte against the non-appearing respondents/persons [on the mentioned date] and further proceedings shall be taken in accordance with law without any further notice..........
But there after again giving one month period to other party to raise objections, insted of passing proper order though the date was fixed for passing proper order.
Regards
Anonymous
04 October 2026 at 10:26
Presently I'm working in CBDT. I joined on 30.04.2025 while I was persuing regular B.ed degree course for the session 2023-25. Course work for second year and teaching internship was over, then only I joined the department. After joining, I intimated the department about my pending B.ed final year exams. When exams came in June I appeared by taking official leaves. My degree came in july. Now I have documents verification for tgt post in a government school. Will they reject me for this overlapping between job and degree?
Anonymous
01 October 2026 at 03:10
Hi,
Is it legally permissible to execute a Will first, and have it registered on a later date? Moreover, is that advisable, or is it better to have the Will executed and registered, both on the same day?
Sorry for being anonymous, but it is important.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Guidance in dv and crpc125
Respected Panel Members
I am a 39 yr old working wife with 2 kids and belong to hindu community. I got married in 2019 it was an intercaste love marriage where my husband belong to SC category. Things were fine for the first 6 months but then mother in law started intervening alot due to which there were constant fights and my husband used to abuse and beat me this went for 3 years. Then I had my first child issues were still going on then I had my second child but still my husband wasn't happy he wanted to control my salary, wanted to keep away from my parents and lot of other harassment then I filed for DV case where I got interim maintenance from court of 10k for my kids and 2k for myself but my husband denied paying any maintenance stating he is unemployed bcz of FIR and DV case hence cannot pay maintenance and constantly has been challenging my case stating that I earn enough to take care of my child my yearly income is around 10LPA I don't need anything for myself but my kids need their right i have also filed 125 for the execution but there has been constant delay sometimes stating he is unemployed, he wants to appear party in person and now he has filed right to education and requested for time from the court, parallel to this he has been logging complaints against my lawyer in bar council against the judge, court staff stating they are biased and not verifying my documents properly hence they all need to be subjected to scrutiny it's been 5 yrs now with no maintenance managing my kids and very hard can someone help and guide me here please what are my options. I don't want to go back as he is very abusive and harmful person