complaint was filed by prop. through SPOA, in which describing that he can file complaints U/s 138 and civil suits on behalf of me, now attorney holder uses the same in different title complaints etc. my question is, when he has only SPOA, how can he use the same in like manner.... how can i prove that he can use the same only in one complaint or civil suit, please elaborate me to satisfy the court concerned.
In 1963 a plot was purchased in Haryana, in the name of two adult brothers A and B, at the time of purchasing A was present who signed the sale deed, paid consideration amount.
B shifted to Punjab never ever came back to reside there, latter on, purchased property in Punjab, made registered GPA in favor of A in 1994 for the above said plot, but in the year 2006, when A's health was not well being 80 years.
His younger brother 'B' with dishonest intention wants to take the advantage of having the name in Sale-Deed, malafidely filed suit for separate partition, who is not in possession since 1963.
Being defendant what defense should i take?
plaintiff in recovery suit, in his examination in chief,has tendered 15 invoice/bill alongwith challans form, containing 30 pages but marked only one exhibit i.e Ex.CW-1/2, whether it is defective, somehow, if yes, what benefit can i take in cross examination, which is still due.
just waiting ur precious advise.
Hello Members,
In the present case the deceased worked as a Manager in the bank and had voluntarily sought the retirement in the year December, 2006 and after that he was receiving the pension from the bank that amounts to Rs.10,000/- per month and after he sought retirement he started the private business but in the month of April, 2008 the husband/father of the claiments had succumbed to the injuries in the accident.
I want the help on the point that in above case, Ld. MACT had ignored the copy of Income Tax Assessment, which was duly proved by them by summoning the record of Income Tax Department, filed by the claiments of the deceased which was filed by the deceased himself for the assessment year 2007-2008 for the financial year 2006-07 and he paid income tax to the department before the accident took place.
But the ld. MACT ignored this fact and assessed the income of the deceased for calculating the earnings by come to an finding that the deceased provides only gratuitous services besides earning for them and in this way his wages could be calculated as casual workman which are around Rs.150/- per day.
So my request to all members is that please provide me some good citations in which the Income Tax filed by the claiments will be taken into consideration for the assessment of the earnings.
Thanks
Munish Kumar Garg
hy i am a first year student studying law can i please get assistance i n notes aditional info for a llb course
I have appealed in high court against district court since last 3 and half months but 3 month after issuing notices opposite party not appearing . My Advocate saying opposite party is want to delay procedures and three dates has been taken afetr first date and search report still not reached to the court.
Opposite party might have arranged local court belif by giving bribes.Please suggest. Waht can be done on such situaton
Dear Experts in Law,
I would like to bring to your notice about the illegal water mining in the city of Hyderabad is going on and they are making crores of rupees of money at the cost of the inconvenience to common public, by way of depleting the natural resources. This is happening throughout the city for ages. why one of the experts are not initiating a PIL on this matter?
i want place written arguments in civil appeal, can i insist the same before the court if the court don't want to make the part of the file, i know application along with written argument, spare copy for opp. party, cpc amended provision, plz let me know any other additional thing, citation etc.
pls let me know the latest citation in which accused is convicted, under civil as well as criminal contempt of court act, where he has done willful breach of an undertaking given to a court.
Will
The maker of will,i.e Husband, can impose a condition, that after his death his wife will be the owner of the house, till her life and after that his two sons would be owner equally. He died, after his death his wife, against that condition, gifted the said house to only one son,
Question is :
1. whether he (deceased) could imposed such condition in his will, as per latest citation of supreme court, because i have heard somewhere that according to earlier judgments he could, but now it has been held he could not, pls explain the same...
2. whether wife was become full fledged owner to take any decision for house in question?