Oibato Hage
20 December 2009 at 05:16
D/Frens,
I have a petition pending in the court regarding 3% job reservation for PH candidate in combined recruitment of AE (civil).
Recruitment was held for 18 posts of AEs under 5 departments.
Initially appointment in 18 posts was stalled by the court for outcome of my petition.
Later,due to the misc case filed by the 17 candidates , 17 posts were vacated by the court and 1 post was stalled for outcome of my petition.
Then, last candidate also filed misc case for vacation of last 1 post remained. However, court declined to vacate it on the ground that post meant for PH cannot be filled by non-PH candidate.
But later, the last candidate produced a State Govt. notification as per which the last 1 post stalled in given deptt. was not an identified post for my PH category. Accordingly, last post was also vacated by the court, but under condition that appointment in last post shall however be subjected to the outcome of my petition.
While having gone throug the said notification, I found that a post in one of the dept. was an identified post for my PH category. But, that particular dept. had requisitioned for only 1 post which was filled by non-PH candidate as and when 17 posts were vacated earlier.
This way, all the 18 posts are vacated by now. However, particular department, whose post was identified for me is yet to submit its reply for not keeping reservation for PH.
Now, while making enquiry,I got the recruitment rule and vacancy list of this particular department through the reliable sources, whereby it is stated that this dept. actually had 9 posts for direct recruitment. But what the dept. did was that it placed for requisition of only 1 posts in direct recruitment. And remaining 8 posts had already been filled by promotion and deputation prior to requisition for direct recruitment.
I have filed an RTI in this dept. seeking information about appointment made by direct recruitment as well as by promotion or deputation in the said posts for this particular period.
Please, suggest me how I should proceed by now. Can I bring this fact to the notice of the Court in instant petition? Or Do I need to file separate petition against the said dept. for violation of its recruitment rule?
Please help………
Rama mohan Acharya
18 December 2009 at 10:12
A central PSU serves a notice under section 19(2) of ID Act to the recognised union.The Union on receipt of the said notice approached RLC(C) for conciliation. THe RLC started proceedings of conciliation.After 2-3 meetings the union submitted a charter of demand to the management. It is noteworth that the charter of demand submitted is on the same issue on which the conciliation is going on.
Kindly advise wether the Union can submit a charter of demand during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings? Please also suggest legal provision and case laws if any.
Regards
sangram
17 December 2009 at 17:28
Dear Sir,
Up to how many years the documents under The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1953 shall be maintained.
If any such provision is there, please prescribe the section accordingly.
Regards,
Sangram
Anonymous
17 December 2009 at 09:44
I am a post graduate & I want to plesd in consumer forum for motor & cattle clatms & also retired from gen.ins.co. after 28yrs. of service.what I do to plead the csaes.
Anonymous
17 December 2009 at 09:42
I am a post graduate & I want to plesd in consumer forum for motor & cattle clatms & also retired from gen.ins.co. after 28yrs. of service.what I do to plesd the csaes.
eswarkumarpotti
16 December 2009 at 12:12
legal consequences of principal empoyeers
Respected Raj kumar Makkad Sir,
Thanks for giving your valuable advise.
1.Please tell about the rule position of exemption of defense estblishments. if, any notification issued by the GOI in this regard and date of notification, as the ALC (C) is not co opreating with us.
2.Nowhere, in the ACT mentionted this exemption clause and where it was notified.
3.Please eduate me on the a/m points.
4. With out being registered ,if principal empolyeer issued form v, then any penal provisions attracted aganist the Govt est.(defense Est.)
Thanking you once again Sir
Anonymous
15 December 2009 at 19:09
I just finished my graduation and joined a company which had a bond for 2 Lakh for 2 years. I joined the company thinking everythings going to be fine.But now as i do not like the nature of job I want to quit. I'm getting really frustrated with the kind of work and unhappy.Do I have to bare it all just because i signed the bond.Moreover the company has not given me any training.
eswarkumarpotti
15 December 2009 at 12:40
Respected Raj kumar Sir,
Thanks for giving your valuable advise.
1.Please tell about the rule position of said exemption of defense estblishments. if, any notification issued by the GOI in this regard and date of notification, as the ALC (C) is not co opreating with us.
2.Nowhere, in the ACT mentionted this exemption clause and where it was notified.
3.Please eduate me on the a/m points.
4. With out being registered ,if principal empolyeer issued form v, then any penal provisions attracted aganist the Govt est.(defense Est.)
Thanking you once again Sir
pawan sharma
15 December 2009 at 10:47
Can an application of section 33 of Indutrial Disputes Act, be filed directly in the Labour Court.Pl,cited case law also
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Reservation in Job for PH ??
D/Frens,
Further what I would like to add is that all those posts which are not identified for me as per state govt. notification is identified for me as per central govt. notification, which I come to know later. So, should I challenge the state government notification ? since I am already a working JE and this post is also not identified for me as per state govt. notification. However, I was appointed before the state govt. notification was published.
Pls give some legal guidance....urgently !!!
which option should I prefer, to proceed ahead ???