Satish Kumar
07 April 2014 at 13:30
I am working as Junior Manager in Public Sector Undertaking. I want to lodge a police complaint regarding my harassment by my boss who sends me SMS text messages and death threaten over mobile phone. I want to know, whether I should seek written permission from my PSU - Personnel Department or go straight away to police station for lodging the complaint against my boss. Please advice me.
Satish Kumar
07 April 2014 at 13:27
I am working as Junior Manager in Public Sector Undertaking. I want to lodge a police complaint regarding my harassment by SMS text messages and death threaten over mobile phone by my boss. I want to know, whether I should seek written permission from my PSU - Personnel Department or go straight away to police station for lodging the complaint against my boss. Please advice me.
Member (Account Deleted)
07 April 2014 at 04:23
Sir/ Madam
I was working for a private firm two years back on a contract for 2 yrs.
I had to leave the job in middle due to some personal problems.I gave in my Resignation and paid the bond money but could not pay notice period dues at that time, so the company terminated me.I'm ready to pay the remaining dues to the company but they say that they would not provide me relieving letter .
I wanted to ask that if i'm selected for civil services or any other govt job ,will this termination have a negative effect therein.
Adv. karinamishra
06 April 2014 at 14:41
departmental inquiry was held by the company by considering a complainant as an officer. the complinant was found guilty in the said inquiry. the complainant approached the labour court for seeking relief for not giving him fair oppotunity also depriving company for terminating his services and not to evict him from company quarter which is provided by the company. however the company opposed the application of the complainant that the complainant has no right to seek relief in the labour court as he is comes into officer catagory and labour court has no jurisdiction to try his application. however labour court decided the application and rejected the application of the complainant. the court deciding decided the application without considering the jurisdiction issue. the said order was given o 25th march 2014 and the complainant received the certified copy of said order on 3rd march 2014.. in the order it is mentioned that the said order would cum into effect from 9th april 2014.
whether the departmental inquiry valid as it was held considering the accused as an officer and not a workman/ employee. whether it is presumed that the accused is an employee /workman and not an officer as the labour court decided his application .
now what is the remedy for complainant? whether he should review the said order or go for revision. Plz suggest.
R.MALLIKARJUN
05 April 2014 at 18:19
Sir,
Greetings,
Please clear my doubt if the company is not paying esic contributions already deducted from employees and not paid to esic , can the authorized person of the company can issue the 37 form for the treatment of employee in esic. eg: from sept 2013 to till date esic amount not paid employees are asking for 37form can issue , if issued any legal problems will arise from esic please tell me sir
Thanking you.
hanif
05 April 2014 at 17:24
As per PF ACT is it compulsory to deduct PF on trainee stipands. If it is compulsory or not then revert with any circular under PF Act.
chandrashekhar joshi
04 April 2014 at 21:35
Hi
I was working as manager in Co-op Bank. Recently I was suspended from services for so called forgery case. I made good and there was no loss to bank. 3 months after suspension I tendered my resignation from the services as I got other opportunity. But management is unhearding my request to relieve me. Till date I had not been issued any charge sheet nor any explanation has been called from me. Instead bank is threatening me that they are not going to relieve me before 1 year from today. My new job joining date is forthcoming please guide me as to what remedy can I have ? Please help I am now desperate. My present Banker is reluctant to take me back on service. As such my suspension will be for indefinite period. Only getting subsistence allowance is not good for me also after 12 months I may be outdated in Banking Sector considering my age factor. I would like to share the instance with me. There was one valued account holder of Bank enjoying credit facility. His nephew had kept FDR in Bank. On a day the account of Borrower was exceeded for large amount and to regularize the nephew agreed orally to discharge his FDR against which the OD was sanctioned and the amount was credited to borrower's account. After word he turned down to have said like that and refused to have signed the documents. As such Bank held me responsible for all above as the sign turned on to be forged. On approaching to FDR holder he came to Bank and on his own closed discharged FDR before maturity and adjusted the amount to OD FDR account. Bank to safe guard its interest had taken an undertaking cum indemnity for sole responsibility for the transactions made and also taken balance confirmation. Now he has signed all the documents and slips and had made clear that he is not going to lodge any type of complaint any where as it is family matter.
Now I would like to know that, is my suspension is justified for indefinite period and by not taking me back on service not Bank is deriving my right to serve by not giving relieving letter.
TEJ NARAYAN RAO
04 April 2014 at 18:38
R/Sirs,
Can someone provide me the
Notification S.O.1285(E) dated 20-05-2009
issued by CLC(C) providing for payment of State or Central Min. Wages, whichever is higher.
Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Hr department check list for service industry
can any expert help me to provide a check list for hr department for service industry...
Your expert advice in this reard is highly obliged.