Anonymous
12 October 2010 at 12:29
Are the employees of the autonomous bodies fully funded by the Government of India covered under Labour Laws? I remember having read a judgment of Karnataka High Court to that effect. Will some expert please quote the Law.
Who is accountable for the misuse of Public funds in the autonomous body which is fully funded by the Government of India?
The Government says they give Grant in Aid. The Chairman and the Members of the autonomous body are reported upon adversely by the Comptroller Auditor General of India but the copy of the Audit is sent to the Government who say it is autonomous body they have nothing to do.
The CBI has reported adversely the Chairman and other officers of the body but the Administrative Ministry sits tight and send the report to the same very officers of the body who are misusing public funds.
Please tell me who is accountable and what can be done. The senior most regular officer of the body who dared to report about corruption gets side lined and is removed from service of the body on the basis of an Inquiry Report procured by payment of about Five Lakhs under the garb of Disciplinary proceedings where the Disciplinary Authority has unlimited powers.
What is the solution to the problem of the Chairman and other members eating away the Public funds and all complaints of the same also be marked to them?
Rupesh
12 October 2010 at 11:10
dear experts,
pl.mail me the address of bahadurgarh, labour office, haryana.
TopAdvocates
12 October 2010 at 00:23
When the mala fides is observed by the Court and the Hon'ble Court is pleased to quash the charge sheet the entire administrative action falls nothing survives.
It will be further mala fide if the charges are picked up from the quashed by Court Charge sheet.
The objective examination should bring out some thing entirely new in the fresh charge sheet.
If so advised may , yes , mean CVC under the circumstances.
Let other experts with high scores like Raj Kumar Makkad and Subramaniam answer the query in public interest. They may even quote the case laws.
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 23:46
When the charge sheet is quashed on the grounds of mala fides and the Court gives liberty to respondents to objectively examine and may issue a fresh charge sheet if so required and if advised can the same verbatim charges say 15 out 20 be re served picked up from the quashed by Court charges?
Does the "if so advised refer" to the First Stage Advice of the Central Vigilance Commission or some one else when there is an application of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965?
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 20:45
I was charge sheeted in 2003. The High Court in 2006 quashed the charges having been found to be raked up, stale and retaliatory but provided respondets one more opportunity to objectively examine the allegations of misconduct of 1997- 2003.
This provided handle to the respondent No. 2 to re proceed against me. Whereas the Respondent No. 1 Central Governemnt remained neutral and did not objectively examine even though directed by the Court the Respondent No. 2 in which my junior was at the helms immediately served 15 out 20 charges that had been quashed by the Court having been found vitaited with mala fides. The catalyst was Government's Order that my junior could no longer act as Secretary and that I was to act as Secretary. He had no statutory powers while holding the additional charge of secretary under CCS cca Rules 1965.
The end of the game is that I have been compulsorily retired in an ex parte Inquiry.
Any advice for me please
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 19:59
Is there any safeguard for a Whistle Blower or is it that the Disciplinary authority who is indicted and has personal interest can impose major penalty upon me.
If the penalty is imposed in the garb and in a farcical inquiry can I do any thing to claim relief.
Any precedence or any citation please.
Thanks in advance.
p k kapoor
11 October 2010 at 17:42
My employer is an educational institute under one of the Ministry, Govt. of India. It has appointed an agency for housekeeping services. The said agency is a proprietorship firm was run by an Ex-Army officer. Suddenly, due to death of the proprietor the firm has stopped its functioning. My employer has to pay/clear the arrear bills of the agency for the period for which the service was rendered satisfactorily. But, there is no existence of the firm now. However, the wife of the proprietor is praying hard and requesting us repeatedly to clear the dues so that outstanding salary to their employees can be released.
In view of the above situation, kindly help us with some legal guidelines for the following query:-
1. How to pay agency bills which has no existence on death of the proprietor?
2. What legal documents can be demanded from the wife/ legal heir if payment is to be released?
3. If payment is to be released, then in whose favour A/c payee cheque can be drawn legally?
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 15:47
We are paper manufacture company. now a days we make renovation in our factory premises. We give contract to third person to renovation. now, contractor's workers working in factory premises. are we paid an ESI amount to workers? if yes WHY?
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 14:41
Please cite the case Laws in which the Manjor Penalty of compulsory retirement was quashed/ set aside by the Supreme Court/ High Court
What the circumstances in which the First stage advice of the CVC mandatory?
Are there any case Laws informing that once a charge sheet has been quashed by the Court on the gounds of mala fides the same vebatim charges can not be served again.
Are there any case laws that the Inquiry proceedings can not be conducted at the residence/ Law Office/ office of a Legal outsourcing company?
Can the Honorary President of a registered Society nominated by the Government as such exercise the executive and statutory powers
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
pay protection
Dear sir
i am working in powergrid as an assistant engineer since last four years on fixed tenaure of five years in the scale of 20600-46500.Right now my basic is 22520 with three increments.Recently i got selected for the same post as a permanent employee.the recruitment was directly interview based for experienced condidates.Now will i get the pay protection or not i.e. weather my basic will be 20600 or 22520.
Rakesh kumar