Anonymous
13 October 2010 at 13:05
What is the court fees required for filing a case under workmen's compensation act for a claim of Rs. 10 lakhs and the limitation period for filing the same?
chandra mohan
13 October 2010 at 12:01
Can Counsel wighdraw the Adjudication case pending before labour court. with ourt signatrue of workman. if any case law please give me
Rama mohan Acharya
13 October 2010 at 07:54
A matter was referred by the appropriate govt for adjudication to Industrial Tribunal, after conciliation failed. After about 2 years, few workmen who were afftected party, submitted to the tribunal that they are nor happy withy the PAIRAVI by the Union, hence they may be allowed to represented separately. The Tribunal allowe3d their appkication. Thereafter they raised an Industrial Disputer by filed another application before the Conciliation Officer. The Conciliation officer issued notice to all parties.
Can a party of a dispute which has already prending at the stage of adjudication raise a fresh dispute on the same subject?
jayanttelang
13 October 2010 at 00:03
Dear sir,i was a medical representative posted in MP state, my management conducted domestic inquiry against me on 5th FEB 2008,inquiry finished on 16th Sept 2009,but management sent me decision on 23rd Aug 2010,deliberately. company discharged me from services,
during this period,company had been paying me only 50% salary,inquiry was totally mlafide,can i file a complaint in local labour court directly,in MP state?
Mugundhan
12 October 2010 at 19:38
Dear Experts, an enquiry officer in a domestic enquiry has conducted the enquiry and completed the proceedings. But he had not given the enquiry report. But now he says that due to his personal inconvenience and health problems, he is unable to give the report and has handed over the papers to the management? What should the management do now?
Anonymous
12 October 2010 at 17:34
I was being harassed for being a whistle blower for a long time.
The Department finally issued me a show cause notice as to why I be not compulsorily retired from service as major penalty .
The Department filed caveat through a Counsel that I would pray for stay of operation of Notice.
I served the advance copy of writ petition upon the Counsel of the Department on 20.09.2010.The matter was to come up for hearing on 21.09.2010.
On 21.09.2010 the Counsel of the Department informed the Court that they had compulsorily retired me vide an Order dated 18.09.2010 which copy was given to my counsel in court.
The office copy served in the Court had annotation made by a section officer issued today and dated as 20.09.2010.
On 21.09.2010 when I reached home i got the speed post and registered speed post letters showing posting time which showed these were posted only on 20.09.2010 clearly after the advance service upon the caveator.
The order dated 18.09.2010 stated I was compulsorily retired with effect from 18.09.2010 but as I said it stated underneath issued today and dated as 20.09.2010.
The 18.09.2010 was Saturday a non working day for my department.
It was predated to make my writ redundant.
My query is can the Order issued on 20.09.2010 though dated as 18.09.2010 compulsorily retiring me on 18.09.2010 Saturday valid and can I find any fault with this and claim any remedy? Is it not retrospective Order?
Please inform me as to the Course of action.
Anonymous
12 October 2010 at 17:14
Dear sir
i am working in powergrid as an assistant engineer since last four years on fixed tenaure of five years in the scale of 20600-46500.Right now my basic is 22520 with three increments.Recently i got selected for the same post as a permanent employee.the recruitment was directly interview based for experienced condidates.Now will i get the pay protection or not i.e. weather my basic will be 20600 or 22520.
Rakesh kumar
Anonymous
12 October 2010 at 12:29
Are the employees of the autonomous bodies fully funded by the Government of India covered under Labour Laws? I remember having read a judgment of Karnataka High Court to that effect. Will some expert please quote the Law.
Who is accountable for the misuse of Public funds in the autonomous body which is fully funded by the Government of India?
The Government says they give Grant in Aid. The Chairman and the Members of the autonomous body are reported upon adversely by the Comptroller Auditor General of India but the copy of the Audit is sent to the Government who say it is autonomous body they have nothing to do.
The CBI has reported adversely the Chairman and other officers of the body but the Administrative Ministry sits tight and send the report to the same very officers of the body who are misusing public funds.
Please tell me who is accountable and what can be done. The senior most regular officer of the body who dared to report about corruption gets side lined and is removed from service of the body on the basis of an Inquiry Report procured by payment of about Five Lakhs under the garb of Disciplinary proceedings where the Disciplinary Authority has unlimited powers.
What is the solution to the problem of the Chairman and other members eating away the Public funds and all complaints of the same also be marked to them?
Rupesh
12 October 2010 at 11:10
dear experts,
pl.mail me the address of bahadurgarh, labour office, haryana.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
file an application in LC
Dear kirti sir,yes i was suspended on the same date 5th Feb 2008, and my previous salary was Rs 8500/-pm,but after suspenssion i was getting 50% of this salary?inquiry was finished on 16th Sept 2009,and dicision was given on 23rd Aug 2010,till this date i was getting 50% of the salary,am i entitled to get full/75% of the salary for the period of 16th Sept 2009 to 23rd Aug 2010?please reply me.