Anonymous
17 February 2011 at 10:43
Please suggest me that whether the Supreme court Judgement dated 09.02.2011 in the case of Mamta Vs. State of Orissa reg. 'If any appointment is made by merely inviting names from the Employment Exchange or putting a note on the Notice Board, that will not meet the requirement of Articles 14 and 16 (equality clause) of the Constitution' is applicable by perusing my following questions -
(1) Is this Judgement applicable retrospectively to the cases where a competitive exam of shorthand and typing held with the candidates sponsored by Employment Exchange or this judgement will be applicable for prospective/future cases only.
(2) I was appointed as stenographer grade 'd' initially in a project by competing 12 candidates sponsored by employment exchange and this test was taken by Director (Education) M/o of HRD. Later on after winding up of the project I was transferred to the one of the regular division of the same ministry. I was getting all regular employees benefits like CPF, Part Final withdrawl with gratuity rules of the institution, LTC (since inception) implementation of 5th and 6th pay commission report and arrears to this effect were also paid to me.
(4) In my initial appointment letter's Terms and Conditions it is clearly shown that 'he will not leave this organisation without the proper approval of this organisation', 'he will will be on the pay scale and will be paid salary at par with the other employees of the main regular organisation, police verification, medical from govt. hospital done;
(3) Am I not qualified stenographer after clearing the competitive exam which was given alongwith the candidates of Employment Exchange ?
(4) I was shown in writing that I was working in the main organisation(regular) against vacant post
Please advise me at the earliest please.
M.Gopal
17 February 2011 at 10:25
Dear Sir,
I belong to General Category and My wife belongs to BC community. Am I eligible to cliaim Intercaste marriage quota in employment exchange in Tamilnadu, if yes, what is the procedure to claim Inter-caste Marriage quota in Tamilnadu Employment
Kindly let me know
Thanks for your valuable time
M.Gopal
Anonymous
16 February 2011 at 17:35
I have a 20 years of service left in a pvt ltd company, and already worked as a clerk for 13 years, and at present my salary is 8000.00 per month.What will be the total compensation amount if my company dis continue my service?
Smita Alphanso
16 February 2011 at 15:05
Sir,
Currently I am working in School. In school the salary is on monthly salary basis. The monthly salary was calculated as per the total day of every month. So we requested you to please give me the actual calculation of the salary as per labour rules. If in february month the salary should be given for 28 days or for 30 days. Please explain me all rules and also calculation. So I can submitted to my school as soon as possible.
Smita
BHOOP SINGH
16 February 2011 at 14:48
We are a trading company in India and our General Manager is a Japanese person and his employment contract is expired on 31.03.2011 but management is willing to extend the contract upto 31.03.2012. so what are the requirements and what is format of employement contact. please advice.
Bhoop Singh
Deepak
16 February 2011 at 13:32
Myself is Deepak Kapoor resident of Ludhiana (Punjab). My father is running a proprietorship firm in the same city since last 7years. In 2007 a case had been filed by a worker in labour court for non payment of his wages, in fact there was no dues pending and he had no evidence that our firm owed to him. Once my father went for appear in the hearing but there was nobody, so he came back, after that 2-3 times notice issued by labour court but we didn't accept because name of firm which was mention on the notice Steel Maker instead of Style Maker.
Now 2 days ago, a summon issued by Session Court in the name of M/s Steel Maker (wrong name) and also wrong house no. 7050 instead of 7052 rejected by owner of house no 7050 and he told the same to me.
Please advice me on this matter.
shekhar
16 February 2011 at 12:58
sir,
is any rule to close the kirani & provisions shops on sundays in karnataka state.
please clarify.
Anonymous
16 February 2011 at 04:00
Hi
I have a query relating to maximum notice period that should be enforceable during probation period.
I joined an IT company which went back on commitments made during the recruitment process and henceforth I resigned. I resigned within 15 days of joining the company, I was asked to serve 3 months notice period as mentioned in the offer letter accepted by me. the clause in the offer is as follows:
4. Probationary Period
You will be on probation for a period of six months and may be confirmed as a permanent associate
upon successful completion of your probation. The period of probation can be extended at the
discretion of the company
5. Notice Period
You will be required to give three months notice in case you decide to leave our services and the same
is subject to the company’s discretion. The company reserves the right at its sole discretion, to
substitute the notice period by paying you base salary in lieu of the notice period.
My question is since I'm on probation and the offer letter does not mention specifically any notice period for Probation. Does the company has the right to make me serve the 3 month notice period which I believe is against natural justice as I was just 15 days old in the organization while resigning. I have formally put the same question to the HR but have received no answer on the same.
Please advice, if there is a legal recourse for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
16 February 2011 at 00:02
A professor of Bihar University died after 1 year of retirement.
He himself in his life couldn't receive all he was supposed to received from govt.
Whether his widow is liable to pension??
Whether his widow can receive all the money, he was suppose to receive??
thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regularisation of Services.
Sir,
I was working in the govt. autonomous body and in the year 2002 the high powered committee of the autonomous body in its meeting where the then Minister of the Ministry under which autonomous body was regulated, former president of india, former m.p. and renowned scholars being members were present and took a unanimous decision "it was decided that the persons who were appointed in the project since 10-20 years may face problem to get regular job outside and it is decided that their cases may be considered for regularisation without affecting the seniority of the regular staff of the institution. This decision came into black and white and circulated through minutes and Member Secretary also forwarded these minutes to the concerned officers for 'necessary action'. But this decision was not implemented and no order was issued except releasing of these minutes.
Sir,
My querry is whether - (i) we the former project employee raise our voice to regularise our services keeping in view the above decision of regularisation which was taken by majority by the high dignitories of our country. (ii) In Uma Devi Judgement it is clearly stated that if decision of regularisation has already taken by the State then the Uma Devi Judgment can not be implemented on the same cases. Sir, can we expect that the decision which was taken in the minutes of the meeting by using words 'may be considered for regularisation' can be considered as decision of regularisation.