KamalNayanSaxena
05 October 2008 at 19:38
What is the scope of writ petition against nongovernment organisation,in the case of dismissal of a workman. Natural justice has been denied to him.
Please post the latest case law
shantilal k. patel
04 October 2008 at 15:57
In a grauity case, I was cross examined by the lawyer of my ex-employee. Now my
lawyer is cross examining the accountant
of the employer.
Why cross examination is necesary? How
it helps? Importance of the same in the
decision etc.
I shall be grateful if any penal lawyer
guide me on the same
s.k.patel
jayanttelang
03 October 2008 at 22:08
Dear Harbhajansinghji,thanks a lot for your guidence,
i am a member of our union(Registered.)which is affiliated to NFSRU,(National Federation of sales Representative's union,Kolkata)they are also supporting me to fight in this matter. But i dont have internal council,would i go through my Union?
where would my union, file complaint,
in the labour court? which is located in my city.
Pradeep Verma
02 October 2008 at 10:31
Dear Sir
Can you please forward your views, more specifiacally and legalized, on the following queries:
What are the legal provisions related to Life insurance & Medical Insurance of employees under Workman compensation Act, ESI Act, EPF &MP Act, Gratuity Act or any other act for the time being in force. Please reply on following bullet points: 1) Type of Employees covered under this Salary wise, Position wise. 2) Kind of liability3) Remedies4) Penalties5) Related Book / Judgement / Web site Anticipating legal opinion from legal / HR experts. Thnx and Regards
Pradeep Verma
KamalNayanSaxena
30 September 2008 at 22:35
A Medical Rep. on probation for the period of two years. After completion of eighteen months, terminated on ground 'services are not found up to the mark of satisfaction'
Kindly provide the latest case law regarding the status of probationer under ID Act.
Is there any chance for his reinstatment?
jayanttelang
30 September 2008 at 18:13
Dear Mr Harbhajansingh ji,once again i have a query regarding my matter.
In the recent past i received a letter from my company's HRD,In short their reference is as below-
1 There is no formal standing orders and you are governed by the rules/regulation & norms of the company which is in accordance with principle of natural justice.
2 It is a Domestic Inquiry- Domestic Tribunal hence the delinquent employee has to attend the Domestic Inquiry where the Domestic Tribunal has been constituted i.e,head office Ahmedabad.
3 There is no mandate to provide defence representative at the cost of employer.
Mr Harbhajansingh ji,i think they have not any certified standing orders,still they are giving me only 50% of my salary,while 7 months have been passed.
in this regard,kindly tell me what to do,& where would i file a complaint.
They are also making a barrier in the way of my Defence represintative (he is my co-employee,in my company,at other H.Q.)
After completion of six months,i sent a request letter to my HRD,regarding 75% of my salary,but he plainly denied to do so,
kindly guide me what to do now?i m waiting for your reply,eagerly!
RAJAN
28 September 2008 at 14:24
An officer in a company made a fraud in company after his enquiry he has dismiss from the services.
He raise dispute under 2-A in Labour Office,for reinstatement and cont.with back wages.we have filed an application to discharge his application because ,he was working in the capacity of officer,(nature of job and his authority while working )and no right to raise dispute and also drawing more than Rs.10,000/- salary pm.
Can Labour office discharge his application.
Also would like to have some case law on the same issue, similar to this.
RAJAN
28 September 2008 at 14:14
with the recent changes in payment of Gratuity Act,whether Teacher is workman under the payment of Gratuity Act.
Adv.Shine Thomas
26 September 2008 at 10:32
Which(where) is the Appellate Tribunal against the order of Joint Provident Fund Commissioner Kozhikode? Form of appeal to be presented before the Appellate Court.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Denial of medical, pensionary benefits to VRS optees
IFCI (having its registered office at 61,Nehru Place ,New Delhi-110 019),a Public Financial Institution, originally established as a statutory corporation by an Act of Parliament in 1948(15 of 1948) and the first Government Institution converted into a company at the threshold of liberalization by another Act of Parliament i.e. The Industrial Finance Corporation (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act,1993, No 23 of 1993 is for all practical purposes an instrument of the Government Of India(GOI has recently directly extended IFCI loans/grants amounting to more than Rs. 5000 crores spreading over 2002/03 -2010/11)
The Section 8 of the above said Repeal Act explicitly protects the service conditions of the employees. The position was reaffirmed by the then Honorable Finance Minister of India on the floor of Lok Sabha on 3rd July, 1998 in reply to an Unstarred Question No 2786
Now IFCI in gross violation of three decades old policy of following Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) in relation to pay scales, pension and other service conditions, by shifting the cut-off date of revision of pay scales , has deliberately denied its 286 retirees their revised due pension, outstanding wages, medical and other related benefits.
Under the circumstances and based on above facts, what VRS optees (who are mostly senior citizens) can do so that they can get releif in a shortest period without incurring much expenditure. For any further informaion pl contact Mr Handa at 9868338030