Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 14:22
sir where wife admits that the statements written by lawyer.
what action is possible to such lawyer?
is it will be good to file a personal recovery suit for false statement has given tremendous mental tress? and the lawyer has miss guided the court to abuse the process of pure law.
if yes under what act and sect?
Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 14:11
sir j m f c court has expressed personal view while granting interim relief that husband i think is not clear that he is ready to take her.
has the court such thinking correct where husband already said that he is ready to take wife with child.
does the court have power to think negative in family disputes?
Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 13:41
who has the burden of prove wife has given false statement that husband is earning upto 30-35 thousand husband says his earning is 4-5 thousand only. court grant interim relief rs. 2000/- both the parties are in appeal in d j court wife demands 10000/- repeating the all false allegations and statements on oath, husband asked for stay order on such 2000/- by jmfc.
wife said husband did not given true income
now d j asked are your allegations are true?
wife said yes
d j asked if these will found false your along with your parents will be sent into jail.
wife said its written by lawyer and i did only sign.
d j crossed to her lawyer as u r a senior lawyer how did u filed such petition husband is already in appeal and given all information of wife allegations. u created a res judicata.
her lawyer prayed for withdrawals
d j asked husband what to do
husband said sir it should on merits and on whimsical withdrawals.
d j given next date for argument as both the parties still not given written reply
sir where wife admits that the statements written by lawyer.
what action is possible to such lawyer?
is it will be good to file a personal recovery suit for false statement has given tremendous mental tress? and the lawyer has miss guided the court to abuse the process of pure law.
if yes under what act and sect?
now what to do?
0
sir its wonder that in 498a
what is in court is different fir with different information but same serial number
what is attached in d v maint. claim is different information but the same serial number.
what is with charge shit its a different one is different information but the same serial number.
more over that what information given in d.v. statement is totally false and different than f i r.
it shows that wife has paid bribe to police to lodge such false complaint.
how may time wife can change her own statement?
what action is possible against police and wife?
out of which two f i r are place before jmfc in d v case
questions is that how many copies are to be made by police?
where at the end of each f i r wife sings and said its all true as per my belief and knowledge and written as per my said information.
my lawyer is silent about all f i r and confused but saying that lets watch what the court think. is my lawyer playing properly?
dipankar
13 November 2010 at 20:48
Dear PARTHARATHI sir,
I am happy with your advice that the marriage of mine done in a temple can be taken to local marriage registration office for registering the marriage. Now my problem is the girl is denying the marriage as her father is not ready to accept our marriage.so i want to lodge a family case under sec.9 of family act. now if the girl will not come will the marriage registrar will issue a certificate on the basis of priests certificate.i also have one marriage photograph with vermilion on her head./the priest us also ready for giving witness.PLEASE HELP.
dipankar
13 November 2010 at 20:11
Dear Debjyotida,
if the temple is not authorised to give a marriage certificate then how will i prove that my marriage was done in the temple.note the priest is ready to give the witness.
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 20:05
Property was purchased in the name of wife as the husband had one more property in the municipal limits. At the time of purchase of property the wife was house wife. Wife entered into Agreement of sale without the knowledge of husband. Husband challenged the so called transaction in F.C.Wife started saying she purchased the property. She had no proof she could not produce any witness.Husband has produced enough materal to prove that he purchased. Unfortunately the F.C. has decided that property has been purchased by wife. How can it be. When wife has not proof of purchase. Can I have your suggestions.
dipankar
13 November 2010 at 19:37
My marriage was solomonised by a hindu priest in a temple.he had given a marriage certificate on a white paper as the temple does not have any temple pad or marriage recieit book.Can i produce this certificate given by him in court to prove my marriage as per Sec.9.
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 13:17
HELLO ALL LEARNDED
MR X IS MUSLIM HAVING THE MARRRIED AND TWO DAUGHTER SHE IS MARRIED WITH THE MUSLIM AND SHE IS FIRST WIFE OF HIM NOW HE CAME CONTACAT TO OTHER LADY WHO IS HINDU AND SHE IS SPINSTER (UNMARRIED)NOW MR X WOULD LIKE TO MARRY WITH SPINSTER (UNMARRIED)HINU GIRL
I HEARD THAT FOR THE REGISTRATION OF MAIRRAGE FIRST OF ALL HINDU SHOULD CONVERT INTO MUSLIM RELIGION AND SHOULD APPLY BEFORE THE COLLECTOR NOW TELL WHAT SHOULD THE PROCEDURE PLS REPLY REGARDS
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 12:11
hi i from mumbai my husband got ex parte decree of divorce against me as sumannce was served to me by court beliff but my husband misguided me that it was not courts prson that time i was not aware about his intation court has passed ex parte on 23 dec 2009 till april 2010 we meet & have relation as husband & wife i came to know about ex parte order in feb 2010 i went forward to court for set aside ex parte order my application is rejected u/s 123 of limitation act what rilief i can get in this cercumstances
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Marriage registration estoppel
Ld Counsels,
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Evidentiary-value-of-marriage-certificate-111826.asp
I have posted the above query regarding the estoppel involved in denying the marriage solemnization when the marraige was registered. It was told that registration is not conclusive proof.
However the issue estoppel can be applied when the party denying the solemnization adds or subtracts new ceremonies as per the community practise over and above what is needed (Saptapadi) and will make the Hindu marraige binding.
When it is a case where there is a total absence of any ceremony or a marraige function then the estoppel cannot be applied.
Does the above proposition appealing to you all.