Y Hari Hara Nath Babu
19 April 2010 at 14:13
Dear Sir,
3. It is submitted that my clienti.e., Balakrishna is only son of Radhakrishna Reddy and Hymavathi of Kondayapalem of Nellore. Whileso that the father of my client and his mother in the year 2007 expressed their intention to celebrate the marriage of my client to their friends & relatives requesting them to choose a bride from an agricultural family with minimum education and also expressed that they do not need any dowry in consideration marriage of their son.
It is humbly that while the search for bride is in force during the year 2007 that the Respondent’s parents and her relatives along with Gattamaneni Sudhakar Naidu approached my client’s family at Vedayapalem on 25-11-2007 and represented that respondent is the daughter of Kalluru Sreedevi and Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy studying Intermediate at Naidupet attained Puberty and willing to offer respondent for marriage to this Petitioner. That the Respondent’s parents and relatives namely Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy, Manda Srinivasulu Reddy, P. Syamalamma and P. Devasena, had also represented that the respondent is a healthy, fully grown up girl for marriage, suitable to the Petitioner’s family and invited the Petitioner and his family members to visit their residence at Naidupet. Accordingly the Petitioner and his family members and one G.Sudhakar Naidu visited the respondent’s house at the request of respondent’s parents and relatives the family members of respondent. Respondent’s Parents and relatives were also present during that Occasion. Thus all respondent’s relatives including her parents represented prior to the fixing off the marriage that all of them brought up respondent with more love and affection since respondent is the only daughter of Madusudhan reddy and Sreedevi.
6. It is submitted that the respondent also expressed her desire and consented to marry this Petitioner at the desire and abetment of Respondent’s Parents and relatives. The Petitioner and his family members consented for celebrating marriage at Naidupet. The marriage was celebrated on 23-4-2008 at Naidupet as per the Hindu rites and customs. Though Respondent’s Parents and relatives agreed to bear marriage expenses but expressed their inability to meet the expenses of Pujari and musical players on the occasion of marriage. That Petitioner’s family borns these expenses with happily without expressing any dissent in whatsoever manner. Respondent’s Parents and relatives supervised the celebrations of the marriage of Respondent actively on 23-4-2008. That the Petitioner’s father borne part of expenses of the marriage. That neither this Petitioner nor his family members never demanded any dowry from Respondent’s family.
7. It is submitted that after the marriage respondent joined the house at Kondayapalem in Nellore city on 24-4-2008. The marriage was not consummated as respondent expressed her unwillingness for consummation on health grounds. That this Petitioner waited for two months even after marriage without any consummation and thereafter that he suffered with Jaundice consequently the consummation of marriage was postponed for further period of four months. During the month of October, 2008 that this Petitioner expressed his desire for consummation of marriage with respondent but petitioner observed the nervous feelings of the respondent and oppressed his desire seeing the condition of the respondent.
8. It is submitted that on 21-10-2008 that this Petitioner and his mother and sister had taken respondent for medical examination at Nellore. To the surprise of Doctors and to this Petitioner that Respondent is lack of Primary sexual organs like uterus, ovaries besides accompanied with blind vagina which made her unfit for consummation of marriage much less even for procreation of children. That respondent misrepresented even on 21-10-2008 that she attained puberty subjected to monthly cycles for all these years. That Respondent’s Parents and relatives tutored Respondent to lie each and every occasion regarding her perfection in respect menstrual cycles. That Respondent misrepresented at the house of the Petitioner during her stay for a period of six or eight months that she was subjected menstruation.
9. It is humbly submitted that blind vagina and in the absence of Ovaries there would no Harmonal secretions in Respondent’s body which prevents penetration and in such situation that respondent is unfit for matrimonial life besides for procuring children. The doctor subjected the Respondent to scanning test in doctor p.v.ramachandra reddy peoples’s Poly clinic in the department Ultra Sonography at Nellore and the scanning report bearing No.20080008234 Dt.21-10-2008 is herewith annexed with this petition. The scanning report corroborates the findings of the Doctors besides contradict the versions of Respondent and her parents. Thus Respondent and her parents besides her relatives played a deception against the Petitioner and his family members by misrepresenting that she attained puberty and also subjected to monthly period cycles which resulted marriage of this Petitioner and thereby Petitioner suffered mental injury and damage to his reputation. Hence the deception of Respondent and parents induced the Petitioner and his family members to consent for the marriage on 23-4-2008 and the same caused much loss and pain and the same amounts to cheating. That Respondent and her parents are fully aware about the factum off absence of primary sexual organs in the body of Respondent and knowing fully well that they played deception in misrepresenting the petitioner by inducement which caused the petitioner for consenting the marriage with Respondent.
10. It is submitted that the Petitioner further submits that respondent left the house of the petitioner at Nellore on 31-10-2008 on her own volition and joined her parents. That the respondent’s parents and relatives are again conspired together with respondent and abetted her and to give a false complaint against this Petitioner, his father and mother that she was subjected dowry harassment during her stay at Nellore to SHO, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District. Apprehending arrest from the S.H.O, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District that this Petitioner and his father and mother obtained Anticipatory Bail in Crmp No.1291 of 2008 on the file of Sessions court, Nellore. Dowry harassment news regarding the complaint given by Respondent to S.H.O Ozili, was widely published in Surya Daily Newspaper in Nellore city & District. This caused damage to the Petitioner’s family reputation which lowered down the image of Petitioner and his family in the eye of public as well as friends and relatives of this Petitioner. Thus the conduct of the Respondent is nothing short of defaming of the family reputation of this Petitioner. The Petitioner’s and his family was subjected to great humiliation in the society for no fault of them. That the marriage is voidable as the marriage contravening the provisions Sec.5 (ii) (b) of Hindu Marriage Act and would not give confer any rights to Respondent against this Petitioner and his family members.
please give which type of suggestion to file case against the case
bala
18 April 2010 at 22:39
sir i have a doubt pls clarify me. Mother purchases a property it is partitioned among her and his two sons. Now one of her son died intestate leaving his wife and two minor sons. My doubt is whether now the mother can file a suit for partition claiming right over the property of the deceased son?
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 22:26
I have been married for 5 years,and have been suffering as my husband is abusive,alcoholic,and physically violent.I want to know the grounds on which i should apply for divorce.Secondly my marriage is registered in Pune,but i live in mumbai.My husband is also currently residing in Mumbai.Therefore can i file for divorce in Mumbai?
thanks
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 21:50
we are two brothers & one married sister
we all brothers had equal shares of money expended in our sister,s marrige.
although we have expended much money.
our sister wants share in our ancestral property.
does she entital for equal share?
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 19:53
I want to know from Experts Possible Reasons for Divorce Suit Dismissal in the middle of the Trail?
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 16:31
Notice u/s 145 Cr.P.C. was issued in October by SDM in respect of a residential property. HC subsequently issued a status quo order. Can the SDM ignore the HC order to alter the status of possession of a property bequeathed exclusively to Complainant in the proceedings u/s 145 Cr.P.C. by the deceased owner-testator ?
Probate proceedings are already on before High Court in respect of the registered Will since April. The beneficiary of such property was pushed out by force and under threats to his life .
After making several complaints to the local police, an FIR was registered in September when the goons/tresspassers were arrested. The beneficiary of this property immediately reoccupied this property as the tresspassers were booked, whereafter, the Beneficiary has been living in the said property peacefully for more than a year, now. Proceedings u/s 145 were initiated after the beneficiary reoccupied the property.
M.Chandra shekar
18 April 2010 at 13:17
1). When does this Act(amended) becomes effective?
17-06-1956? or much before, if so, when?
2) Does this amendment confers the right for the daughters, who are born before 17-06-1956?
3). What if a partition is effected before 24-12-2004, registered as per the provisions of The Registration Act of 1908? Is it valid?
amin
18 April 2010 at 10:52
Dear sir,
I was married in 2005 i am from upper middle and my husband from middle class
every thing was going well some 1 yr after my marriage my father in law (f i l) started saying we are incurring loss in businness and started seeking help from my father
my father also started helping as my husband was good to me.
latter this happend the routine cause. my brother in law father inlaw & my husband used to sit in the same shop.
latter I came to know they are opening a new shop.
from where I understood the plan game of fil.and I asked my father not to help any more.
NOw my in laws started torturing me n my father.my husband was a mum puppet
latter they started planning of taking divorce n remarry him with a widow who was the only daughter.
so left with no choice i filled 498 a case.my father had some cheque entries which proved ample evidence of demand from their side.
than my in laws moved to the family court for divorce saying that i am cruel to them by putting 498 case.
i went to the court to stop the hassasment done for money to me n my family.and want to live with my husband without my in laws.
please guide me.
And also provide some judgements where divorce on basis of 498a is not entertained.
Anonymous
17 April 2010 at 19:51
I had Filed Divorce and Henchmen Injunction Petition in the Family Court, I got Interim Order on Injunction, and Case proceeded for 3 Hearing their after the Opposite Party Went to HC for Transfer of Suits from Family Court to Senior Civil Judge Court and accordingly the HC Ex-Parte Transfered the case from Family Court to Civil Court, From that date onwards I am not attending the Case for 6 months, As I suspect their is Life threat to me as the opposite party is notorious, If I go their for hearing , Now I have 2 Questions:
1.Why did HC did not follow the Family Court act Chapter 8, which was designed by HC itself, while Transferring the case from Family Court to Civil Court which is 38kms away within the same District?
2.What would be the Fate of my Divorce Suit and Injunction Suit as I am not attending the Case for more then 6 months now?
Anonymous
17 April 2010 at 19:48
Is an amendment aplication tenable in a petition for judicial separation under s/10 to convert it into one under s/13 Hind marriage Act?
hindu law
Dear Sir,
3. It is submitted that my clienti.e., Balakrishna is only son of Radhakrishna Reddy and Hymavathi of Kondayapalem of Nellore. Whileso that the father of my client and his mother in the year 2007 expressed their intention to celebrate the marriage of my client to their friends & relatives requesting them to choose a bride from an agricultural family with minimum education and also expressed that they do not need any dowry in consideration marriage of their son.
It is humbly that while the search for bride is in force during the year 2007 that the Respondent’s parents and her relatives along with Gattamaneni Sudhakar Naidu approached my client’s family at Vedayapalem on 25-11-2007 and represented that respondent is the daughter of Kalluru Sreedevi and Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy studying Intermediate at Naidupet attained Puberty and willing to offer respondent for marriage to this Petitioner. That the Respondent’s parents and relatives namely Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy, Manda Srinivasulu Reddy, P. Syamalamma and P. Devasena, had also represented that the respondent is a healthy, fully grown up girl for marriage, suitable to the Petitioner’s family and invited the Petitioner and his family members to visit their residence at Naidupet. Accordingly the Petitioner and his family members and one G.Sudhakar Naidu visited the respondent’s house at the request of respondent’s parents and relatives the family members of respondent. Respondent’s Parents and relatives were also present during that Occasion. Thus all respondent’s relatives including her parents represented prior to the fixing off the marriage that all of them brought up respondent with more love and affection since respondent is the only daughter of Madusudhan reddy and Sreedevi.
6. It is submitted that the respondent also expressed her desire and consented to marry this Petitioner at the desire and abetment of Respondent’s Parents and relatives. The Petitioner and his family members consented for celebrating marriage at Naidupet. The marriage was celebrated on 23-4-2008 at Naidupet as per the Hindu rites and customs. Though Respondent’s Parents and relatives agreed to bear marriage expenses but expressed their inability to meet the expenses of Pujari and musical players on the occasion of marriage. That Petitioner’s family borns these expenses with happily without expressing any dissent in whatsoever manner. Respondent’s Parents and relatives supervised the celebrations of the marriage of Respondent actively on 23-4-2008. That the Petitioner’s father borne part of expenses of the marriage. That neither this Petitioner nor his family members never demanded any dowry from Respondent’s family.
7. It is submitted that after the marriage respondent joined the house at Kondayapalem in Nellore city on 24-4-2008. The marriage was not consummated as respondent expressed her unwillingness for consummation on health grounds. That this Petitioner waited for two months even after marriage without any consummation and thereafter that he suffered with Jaundice consequently the consummation of marriage was postponed for further period of four months. During the month of October, 2008 that this Petitioner expressed his desire for consummation of marriage with respondent but petitioner observed the nervous feelings of the respondent and oppressed his desire seeing the condition of the respondent.
8. It is submitted that on 21-10-2008 that this Petitioner and his mother and sister had taken respondent for medical examination at Nellore. To the surprise of Doctors and to this Petitioner that Respondent is lack of Primary sexual organs like uterus, ovaries besides accompanied with blind vagina which made her unfit for consummation of marriage much less even for procreation of children. That respondent misrepresented even on 21-10-2008 that she attained puberty subjected to monthly cycles for all these years. That Respondent’s Parents and relatives tutored Respondent to lie each and every occasion regarding her perfection in respect menstrual cycles. That Respondent misrepresented at the house of the Petitioner during her stay for a period of six or eight months that she was subjected menstruation.
9. It is humbly submitted that blind vagina and in the absence of Ovaries there would no Harmonal secretions in Respondent’s body which prevents penetration and in such situation that respondent is unfit for matrimonial life besides for procuring children. The doctor subjected the Respondent to scanning test in doctor p.v.ramachandra reddy peoples’s Poly clinic in the department Ultra Sonography at Nellore and the scanning report bearing No.20080008234 Dt.21-10-2008 is herewith annexed with this petition. The scanning report corroborates the findings of the Doctors besides contradict the versions of Respondent and her parents. Thus Respondent and her parents besides her relatives played a deception against the Petitioner and his family members by misrepresenting that she attained puberty and also subjected to monthly period cycles which resulted marriage of this Petitioner and thereby Petitioner suffered mental injury and damage to his reputation. Hence the deception of Respondent and parents induced the Petitioner and his family members to consent for the marriage on 23-4-2008 and the same caused much loss and pain and the same amounts to cheating. That Respondent and her parents are fully aware about the factum off absence of primary sexual organs in the body of Respondent and knowing fully well that they played deception in misrepresenting the petitioner by inducement which caused the petitioner for consenting the marriage with Respondent.
10. It is submitted that the Petitioner further submits that respondent left the house of the petitioner at Nellore on 31-10-2008 on her own volition and joined her parents. That the respondent’s parents and relatives are again conspired together with respondent and abetted her and to give a false complaint against this Petitioner, his father and mother that she was subjected dowry harassment during her stay at Nellore to SHO, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District. Apprehending arrest from the S.H.O, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District that this Petitioner and his father and mother obtained Anticipatory Bail in Crmp No.1291 of 2008 on the file of Sessions court, Nellore. Dowry harassment news regarding the complaint given by Respondent to S.H.O Ozili, was widely published in Surya Daily Newspaper in Nellore city & District. This caused damage to the Petitioner’s family reputation which lowered down the image of Petitioner and his family in the eye of public as well as friends and relatives of this Petitioner. Thus the conduct of the Respondent is nothing short of defaming of the family reputation of this Petitioner. The Petitioner’s and his family was subjected to great humiliation in the society for no fault of them. That the marriage is voidable as the marriage contravening the provisions Sec.5 (ii) (b) of Hindu Marriage Act and would not give confer any rights to Respondent against this Petitioner and his family members.
please give which type of suggestion to file case against the case