Pooja Khare
29 June 2012 at 18:02
Hi I am Mrs. Pooja Khare, advocate by Profession i wanted to know whether is it mandatory to change my madain name to my matrimonial name on the bar council id or can i continue to practice with the same. As i personally do not intend to change my maiden name appearing on my bar council id. Am i allowed to do so for purpose of my profession rest other documents like my PAN Card is bearing my matrimonial name.
Please explain.
vineet
29 June 2012 at 12:02
A FIR was made against Mr. AA In june2011
in 498a,406 ,34 IPC. Mr.AA got anticipatory bail from High court of delhi and in order sheet it was clearly mentioned
that No Haraasment in case to dowry. Bail granted.
Mr.AA gave written application to DCP delhi police to cancel the FIR as case filed by wife is false and investigation done by I.O. is totally partial and one-sided. and moreover high court mentioned that no harassment in relation to dowry.
Now one year passed,after the FIR was made.
Question-
After lapse of one year i.e. 1st week ofjune2011 to june2012, Police can make the chargesheet or not.
Secondly can they consider the genuine cause
and cancel the said FIR.
Expert advocates opinion required.
gaurav
29 June 2012 at 12:00
Please explain the points which reflects the women cruelty in married life and can be ground for annulment or divorce.
Rajeev
29 June 2012 at 10:43
My Female relative want to take divorce from her husband. Please help
1.She has no money to bear the court & lawers fee expenses. So is it possible that she can claim all the legal expenses from her husband before start the case? Clarify please.
2. Now she want that her husband will give at least Maintaince charge for herself and her baby. Is it possible, if yes then how explain. Her husband is doing job and getting salary of approx. 40 thousand.
3.If she want to take divorce then how much time it will take
4.What will take the charge of baby? Either her Husband or her( My relative)
5.Will she get a part of their property? Because all the property is ancestral and not self earned by her husband or her inlaws. Property is on the name of all brothers of her father in law including father in law.
6. If she gets divorce from her court how much compensation she will get from there.
Sameer12345
29 June 2012 at 09:35
Facts of the case:
1) Second Husband has Divorce Deed from his first marriage
2) Second Wife has also Divorce Deed from her first Marriage
3) Second Husband and Second Wife both have Registered the marriage.
4) Second Husband was under impression that He is legally divorcee.
5) Now Second Husband got to know that Divorce Deed is a not a valid document of divorce.
6) Second Wife is planning to file 498a against Second Husband and relatives of Second Husband including DV and CRPC 125.
Note: Second Husband here is me and Second Wife here is my non-legal wife of void marriage.
Questions:
1) Can Second Husband file Section 494 against Second Wife?
2) If yes, How?
kavkaz
28 June 2012 at 22:08
The Magistrate has dismissed my wife's RCR petition as she stated that she doesn't want to reconciliate with me. Her Interim Maintenance Joint Petition was also dismissed on the same grounds.
Now, the following are my queries.
1. Can I now immediately file a petition for Divorce or Wait for 1 year to pass and then file a petition for divorce?
2. Will it be safe to file a divorce petition mentioning in it that "I am even now ready to reconciliate with her but she is not. So please.........blah blah blah"
Member (Account Deleted)
28 June 2012 at 21:42
mere pati ne mujhe mumbai sai 2 saal pahele agra bhej diya.ab mere pati ne talak ka case 2 saal ke paritiyag ka dala hai.Agar mai kahti hu ki paritiyag mane nahi mere pati ne kiya hai.yeh mai kaise parmarit kar sakti hu?
Kripya sahyata kare.
mohammed rafiq
28 June 2012 at 20:42
A sunni muslim men dying intestate leaving behind three married sons and married daughter from first wife(non-muslim,already died)& second wife (does not have any child) & his younger brother and his family.The deceased and his younger brother was leaving in the same house for the last 30 years.Hear important thing is that both, the deceased and his younger brother worked together and purchased a house for leaving but the title of the house is in the name of deceased person.Further two out of three son was leaving in another house for the last 20 years.Both the sons were compelling father before his death for removing deceased younger brother but the deceased verbally refused & said that "i've already given you another house & you don't have any share in the disputed house".The deceased also told his second wife before his death that after "my death the disputed house will be yours". Now after the death of father two sons out of three are demanding share in the house and wants to remove deceased persons younger brother from the house.The younger brother does not have any documentary proof that he paid certain amount of money at the time of purchasing of the house except that he had possession of certain part of the house since the purchase of the property.The second wife of deceased & third son (youngest) are in favour of deceased younger brother & does not wants to remove the brother.Both the sons now harassing there youngest brother,second wife & deceased brother for property although no legal proceeding is initiated by both sons but they are showing intention for the same.Pls. confirm what is the best possible defence available for the younger brother of deceased if suit filed against him & what he will do in present circumstance.Pls answer the earlier query is modified.
Pavan
28 June 2012 at 17:16
D/Sir,
I lives in Delhi. My estranged spouse lives in M.P. and the accused ( 3rd person) lives in Silvassa. The accused is in illegal relationship with my estranged wife and she enjoyed holidays in Maharastra and Goa for 3 days. I have got the call records and journey records of my spouse. This is a criminal offense and I want to register case against the accused person. I want to file FIR immediately.
Please suggest , where should I file this FIR.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Different versions pleaded
Ld counsels,
Wife filed restitution of conjugal rights and withdrew the same. She filed annulment petition on the ground of fraud with additional facts and different version of the events pleaded in the earlier restitution of conjugal rights petition.
The only explanation for not pleading the additional facts and the earlier version being differnt was that she came to know the intension of the husband after the discovery of fraud on marriage.
Will this explanation be sufficient to hold that she is justified about the omission to plead the same facts appropriately in earlier petition. The RCR petition is withdrawn what effect will it have on the annulment proceedings.
Please clarify.