Sarathy
27 January 2019 at 21:10
Hi Sir,
I have applied for divorce. My lawyer asked fixed amount to finish the case. I accepted and paid 90% till now. Suddenly he is asking for more money.
I am unable to pay as my financial situation is not good. I need to appear in the court for giving " my statement" next month as my wife didnt appear in the court.
I am asking my lawyer to give the document to me and planning to arrange another layer. But he is saying all the reason in the world.
I am planning to appear in the the court on the next hearing. I am also planning to complain about my lawyer in the court for not giving the documents to me as he is asking more money.
If my lawyer doesnt appear in the court , is there any issue for me giving statements in the court(case status is "Ex-Parte Evidence")
Pleas give me some suggestion on this how to proceed further. I am struggling with out proper job and financially become weak.
For Any help on this , i would be thankful.
Vasudevan
27 January 2019 at 17:20
The husband has received the summon while he was in India. Subsequently he has gone abroad. The Power of Attorney is appearing for the case. However, Family Court Judge has not accepted marked in the docket that Respondent [husband] called absent. The counsel for the husband has orally stated that they are going to file mutual consent divorce and seeking adjournment. The same is also recorded by the Judge in the docket. But even after five adjournments neither the petition for mutual consent filed nor the husband appeared. Whether, the wife may insist upon ex-parte order. Whether the Husband can contest the divorce petition even after the record of the Judge for mutual consent. The wife has filed petition only for divorce. No maintenance or alimony claimed in the petition. There is a girl child in the custody of the wife. The petition is being filed on desertion and cruelty grounds. Please guide. Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
26 January 2019 at 13:21
This message is for my friend. She got married and started to live with her husband and family. The boy's parents started to fight with couple asking for her gold. they after much difficult gave the gold 100g(the full), which given to her on her marriage. the boy's parents then started to spent it and sold 25g, when this came to the knowledge of the couple they fought with them and took it back, they could retrieve the only 75g. now the boy's parents are fighting with them for providing them with a new apartment, money to marry their daughter off. Already they forced the boy to take 7lkh loan before marriage in the form of marriage expenses, he has a job and most of his money goes under this loan payment. Now they are fighting with the couple to get them separated so that they won't have family life together. It was an arranged marriage. the couple wants to stay together. Please advise what can be done against the parents without harming their marriage.
Umesh Pandurang Jadhav
25 January 2019 at 14:21
Name: vineeth.
Possible to marry 2 nd time during pendancy of divorce case in court.
Umesh Pandurang Jadhav
24 January 2019 at 21:38
Plaintiff - leena.( female) repondant - manish(male).
Leena filed u/s 12-1a HMA 1955. Against respondent.
Judge order dissmiss.
After few days of dissmiss order leena received medical evidence of manish, in which she forgot to show the judge.
While review peitition in appelant court with additional medical evidence, is it possible for her to make a new amendments...for divorce.
Member (Account Deleted)
24 January 2019 at 13:02
Hi experts,
I filed divorce case against my husband. in that i filed amendment and it was allowed. husband is impotent. so he went to high court for that amendment and is in pending stage.. High court did not grant stay yet. but in the lowercourt his local counsel managed and putting case stage as STAY and not proceeding the case.What steps can i take against lower court ? how to proceed and get divorce on this situations?
Maggiey
24 January 2019 at 12:12
Hello. Am a law student and am looking for an assistance on the explanations of doctrine of self acquisition or self acquired property under Hindu joint family. Also, I need several case laws which explain further about this doctrine. Please kindly help me am very much in need
Maggiey
24 January 2019 at 12:05
Hello. Am a law student and am looking for an assistance on the explanations of doctrine of self acquisition or self acquired property under Hindu joint family. Also, I need several case laws which explain further about this doctrine. Please kindly help me am very much in need
Anonymous
23 January 2019 at 23:29
My wife has filed petition for child interim and permanent maintenance and asking 15000 per month, I have submitted the WS, Judge asked me how much I can pay, I said 3k..then judge gave next date and said that he will order in the next date... Now what should be my move to allow minimum interim or extend the same
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
review petition cpc 114 order 47
Marriage peition is dissmisses by judge??
Possible to use this process in case of review petition
Section 114 of the code although does not prescribe any limitation on the power of the court but such limitations have been provided for in Order 47, Rule 1 of the CPC. The grounds on which review can be sought are enumerated in Order 47, Rule 1 CPC, which reads as under: Application for review of judgment (1) Any person considering himself aggrieved (a) by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed, but from which no appeal has been preferred, (b) by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed, or (c) by a decision on a reference from a Court of Small Causes, and who, from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or order made, or on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, or for any other sufficient reason, desires to obtain a review of the decree passed or order made against him, may apply for a review of judgment to the court which passed the decree or made the order