Anonymous
20 January 2023 at 01:19
Greetings to all hon'ble members,
I am a government servant. Prior to my current appointment I was working in central govt job on regular post. I did more than 2 years of regular govt. service in my previous department, however I was on probation and my services awaited confirmation.
In mean time I applied for another government job through proper channel and secured it successfully. My new department (which is my present deptt. now) treated me as DCF/ Departmental candidate and asked me to submit NOC, medical and police verification report from my parent/previous employer. So basically they exempted me from medical and police verification. And yes I submitted 3 copies of ATTESTATION FORM 6 Month before joining present job.
I joined the new department around 3 years and 4 months back, but unfortunately I was falsely implicated in FIR u/s 376 and Dowry Prohibition Act just after 2 months of joining my new job. As this was a false and frivolous allegation so I moved my anticipatory bail. The court granted me the same and I was saved from police and jail custody.
I was very scared and dipressed due to false case and meanwhile COVID lockdown came and i suffered even more. Meanwhile
As first COVID restrictions were eased out I informed the department about this false FIR. Around 2 ¹/² years have passed since I informed.
Now suddenly after these years my department is asking me to:
1) explain the reasons why I suppressed the case from them.
2) Verbally they are asking me to submit a fresh attestation form. Though my HOD has already submitted online CVR, they are verbally asking me to fill paper form again.
My questions:
A) Will I be suspended or even terminated due to this case? I am on Anticipatory bail never went in Police Custody or JC.
B) Being DCF candidate I was exempted from medical and police verification, should I file attestation form again? Or should I insist on using my old Attestation form?
Pls guide me I am very tensed. And extremely sorry for being anonymous.
aayush kuchhal
11 January 2023 at 14:30
I have filed a Complaint before the Magistrate under Section 156(3) crpc. The IO has filed ATR stating the case to be of civil nature. On the bare perusal of ATR, it can be seen that proper investigation has not been carried out.
Though after making arguments before the Magistrate, the Magistrate has directed the IO to again file a fresh ATR.
If the IO will file the ATR without any proper application of mind again, what will be the best alternative remedy available to get the FIR registered
T anand
09 January 2023 at 12:43
Suit filed for a Cheque Bounce by Financial Institution. Accused appears in the Court along with his elder brother. Filed the Bail Application. Brother signs the Affidavith along with copy of RTC of a property measuring about 20 Cents valued at Rs 19,00,000.
Question is :
Property was sanctioned by governmnet in 2021 as part of AkramaSakrams Scheme. Grant Order has a condition of prohibiting "parabhare:", (a handing over of the possession (of something) to another; assignment to others) for 25 years.
Is this legal ?
Mistake ? punishable ?
Its in Karnataka State, Udupi District
Guru
09 January 2023 at 04:19
dear sir , I think to appeal in the court for defamation case so may I know do I need to pay higher court fee for defamation case ? means in percentage of what we request for compensation ? Thank you.
minsal
08 January 2023 at 01:28
Respected Experts,
I am representing the accused in one matter filed u/s. 138 of N. I. Act wherein I have filed discharge application to which the CA of Complainant has filed his say. the CA is a son of complainant mother. the mother has filed the complaint but reply to the discharge application is filed by her son as her CA without any POA or LOA. i am in need of a judgment that the son has no locus standee to represent the complainant as he doesn't have any authority and the reply filed by the son is inadmissible.
Please provide me some citation on this.
Thank you.
JAIME
07 January 2023 at 02:17
SIR,
MY CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION IS PENDING BEFORE THE HIGH COURT ON MATTER U/S 195 R/W 304. THE JUSTICE OF HIGH COURT DID NOT GRANT EXPART STAY AND SUMMOND THE RESPONDENT HOWEVER THE RESPONDENT DECLINED TO RECEIVE THE SUMMON TO APPEAR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AND INSTEAD THE BAILIFF RETURNED STATING THAT THE RESPONDENT IS NOT RESIDING AT THE SAID ADDRESS.
MEANWHILE THE CRIMINAL CASE IS CONTINUING BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT AND THE TRIAL COURT FRAMED CHARGE WITHOUT PASSING ORDER ON ARGUMENT BEFORE FRAMING CHARGE. IN THIS CASE IS IT PERMITTED BY LAW TO FILE REVISION APPLICATION BEFORE THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT OR WILL THIS BE CONTEMPT OF COURT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY
rishabh
06 January 2023 at 14:27
Res Experts..
I filed a complaint before MM regarding a fake report concluded by sexual harassment committee.. Means..there was no report but culprits framed a forged report exonerating Themselves....U/s 420 IPC..Now the MM is arguing that, the case is one of sexual harassment and only the victim can file such complaint, while my allegation is regarding forgery for the purpose of cheating.. The case is adjourned rt now and put up for orders.. While as per law, MM ought to take cognizance and proceed with pre summoning evidence or could send the complaint to police u/s 156(3)..plz guid me
Anonymous
01 January 2023 at 16:32
I am accused in IPC 338 Accident case and my advocate filed criminal appeal in the court which is about to start next month. My advocate is planning to ask lenient view to the court but i am not that aware of the process and procedures.
1. if appeal is dismissed, will I be sent to jail immediately from the court ?
2. What will happen to my job if appeal is dismissed?
3. Is there any way I can fight further or I need to quit ?
The complaint filed MACT claim case and about to get compensation from my insurer, still they are not ready to settle after conviction from trial court.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can a son ask maintenance from his mother under 125 crpc
I (father) have filed a maintenance case for my son from his mother under 125 crpc. My wife and me both are in government service.The interim order of maintenance was passed against my wife by district court in 2019. My wife has now gone to High court in 2022 for stay against this interim order stating that a son can not ask maintenance under section 125. She got the stay this interim order in May 2022. Now I want to go supreme court against this stay for vacating this stay. Kindly guide us, whether this case is maintainable in court or not ?