A property granted under Karnataka's Akrama Sakrama Scheme in 2021, which has a 25-year restriction on handing over possession, has been offered as surety in a cheque bounce case. The core question is whether this restriction makes the surety legally invalid or if it was a mistake. The court has accepted the surety without being aware of the condition, and advice is sought on how to bring this to the court's attention, potentially anonymously or through a lawyer.