Adv. Mohan Chandra
28 April 2009 at 15:54
Sir/Madam,
Recently I procurred a copy of the Roznama to check and bring to the notice of the court that the complainant and his Advocate were being regularly absent for proceedings to my surprise the complainant has been marked as present on the last hearing while actually he was absent and the complainant advocate has filed an application for adjournment on this ground as the complainant was absent.
Further on the previous hearing to the above the complainant and the complainant Advocate both were absent and the application for adjournment was delivered to court by their office boy and for this act the complainant was penalised Rs.1000/- but the Roznama states as Advocate present.
What should I do?
Mohanji
A Truthseeker
27 April 2009 at 22:49
criminal trial takes long time.an accused committing crime gets bail and remains free for several years creating impression meanwhile in the society that most offenders are little affected for doing wrongs. if the UTPs are granted only interim bail with condition to maintian a personal diary recording his hourly engagements , and in case of illeterate persons with the help of others can we expect better law and order?
vinod bansal
27 April 2009 at 18:02
R/All
Whether initial transaction is required to be proved.what is the latest law/citation for presumption of debt.Thanks
vinod bansal
26 April 2009 at 21:04
R/All
Is there any necessity of prior sanction for prosecution of a Asst. Sub Inspector of Police in Haryana,ASI of Haryana Police is removable by Govt. or not as per requirement of applicability of section 197 crpc. in Haryana. Thanks
A Truthseeker
26 April 2009 at 17:52
investigation of a crime is by and large a function of the police. the role of judge comes into play only after the charge is framed. but the entire prosecution proceeds on case-diary which is wholly prepared by the investigating police officer who enjoys statutory protection not to b interfered by judiciary during investigation.as a result if the police perfunctorily holds investigation or with intentional manipulations, the truth never reveals and the crime can not b adjudicated.if the entire investigation process be viedo recorded with instantaneous storing in an internet site which would then be retrieved and serve as case-docket can we expect better justice?
Chetan
26 April 2009 at 17:31
My client runs a business of online lottery of Arunachal Pradesh Govt. in Maharashtra. One of the customer draws the online tickets of Rs. 50,000/-. and give the cheque to my client, which is dishonour.
Whether I can file Complaint u/s 138 & 142 or under any provision pls. provide if any and case laws.
Regards
vinod bansal
24 April 2009 at 22:47
Respected All
I filed a pvt crl complaint against Supdt. of police in the court of chief judicial magistrate & today case was fixed for arguments,arguments were advanced by me & now case is fixed for 20-7-09 for consideration on summoning, Magistrate is biased & he knowingly case adjourned for a long date,I want to file a Application for early hearing,what should be grounds & what is remedy available to me in this regard.Thanks
A Truthseeker
24 April 2009 at 20:49
in The Mahabharata we got Droupadi was rescued when Dushyashan attempted to denude her.but Bhima was so exasperated as he took the vow to kill and drink the blood o Dushyashan. that signifies how the Indian women were looked at once upon a time.in IPC outraging modesty of an woman is a bailable offence.sud this British legacy still exist in Indian law?
vinod bansal
24 April 2009 at 17:56
R/All
when we can say that court has taken cognizance spl. in private complaint cases & in FIR (State) Cases, My query is in context of section 197 crpc in which sanction order is compulsary while taking cognizance against a public servent..in my case i had filed a pvt. complaint against Supdt. Of Police & preliminary evidence has closed & now case is fixed for consideration/order on summoning.whether sanction is mandatory prior to issue summoning order against a public servent in complaint case.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
324
Sir,
Need advice from experts on the following issue
Recently about a month ago on way to office had encountered a minor incident where someone(in car)wanted to overtake my car from left causing almost an accident which i reacted by not allowing him to overtake and driving slowly in the center of the narrow lane.
The guy overtook and blocked the road right in front of my car before jumping out an kicking on my windshield and window glass. As an act of defence, i pulled out a plastic cost hanger in my car, opened the window and hit him on his hand.
By this time, the road was blocked and hence the guy went his way and i too did the same.
I just realized 2 days back, that the guy had taken a doctor certificate on that particular day that his hand was hurt badly due to teh hanger hit, and filed an FIR under section 324 for which i was taken to station and had to be bailed out by family.
The police state, that the chargeseet would be filed in court and will try and ask the guy who complained to meet me to do a settlement.
Request your help on what are my options now Since i had not lodged a compliant that day thinking it was a minor road rage issue and more so since it was his fault
Will this FIR always feature against my name
Is there any way that i could get this issue closed.
Please help
Rgds