Chetan
13 April 2009 at 18:18
Res. Member
A cheque has been issued by the accused without sing but he signed on the back side of the cheque.
1) Whetehr I an file a complaint u/s 138
2) Whether the FIR may lodge u/s 420
Pls urgent
Legal_Query
13 April 2009 at 16:24
Hi,
Is it mandatory to mention the name of the bank of the complainant in the notice given u/s 138 N.I.Act. If yes what to do if it had been missed in the notice pls suggest.
Thnks & Rgds
Satyaprakash Sharma
13 April 2009 at 15:22
Can application be made for transfer of proceedings u/s.107 Cr.P.C. from one Executive Magistrate (Asst. Commissioner of Police in Mumbai) to another?
If Yes. Before whom? (District Magistrate OR CMM OR Session Judge)
Please provide relevant authority/provision.
Thanks
-Satyaprakash
AMIT TANEJA
13 April 2009 at 12:05
if a person with the intension to thread someone carries a pistal with him to his house. but in a heated conversation fire a bullet on the plaitiff who in order to save himself jumps from the balcony and bullet so fired hit him on his leg but died becuse of falling from height
wt sections can save him
if u r on the plaintiff's side
AMIT TANEJA
13 April 2009 at 12:03
if a person with the intension to thread someone carries a pistal with him to his house. but in a heated conversation fire a bullet on the plaitiff who in order to save himself jumps from the balcony and bullet so fired hit him on his leg but died becuse of falling from height
wt sections can save him
if u r on the defandant side
anju jain
13 April 2009 at 10:21
Dear All,
what would be the consequence of the cases pending trial after harman Electronics (p) ltd vs. National panasonic (I) ltd. Will it have retrospective effect. remedy/ redressal if any.
thanks
Somnath mukherjee
12 April 2009 at 13:58
My wife filed a case u/s498a,313,506,34 I.P.C against me and my family in kalyan court u/s 156(3) on 22-2-2007 and case was subsiquently rejected by the Ld.C.J.M on the grund of jurisdiction.After some days my mother-in-law files another case u/s498a,323,326,328,313,315,148,457,147,427,504,506,120B I.P.C against me by colouring the same cause of action and upon the same court by supressing the previous one.The police has already filed a chargesheet but the charge is yet to be framed.Whether this case is tenable? Whether i can file quashing? Which one is better for me? Please suggest some relevent case laws.
A Truthseeker
11 April 2009 at 19:57
death sentence is awarded in rarest of rare case.but so far as man is concerned is there any case that can be termed as rarest of rare? our scripture enjoins each soul is potentially divine. dacoit and ghoul Ratnakar was so corrected nay transformed that he became the greatest poet to compose Ramayan.incarceration for the rest of the life would not do instead of death?
Jitendra Raval
11 April 2009 at 15:58
The accused handed over two cheque to the complainant which was singed but without payee name and date,amount etc in good payment for payment of insurance premium in 2002.
There were few financial transations between the two but nothing was due. When relation between the two spoiled, the complainant filled up the blanks and lodged the cheques in 2008 which was bounce as the account was inoperative after some time after his transfer.
The complainant filled the blanks but forget to strike bearer and hence these cheques remain bearer when presented for payment and returned unpaid.
My question is "Whether the bearer cheques covered under S.138' If not kindly provide me the citation.
Or it does't metter the cheques in question was bearer or order.
Kidly reply
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bombay Prohibition act
Dear Sir/Ma'am
Where is " Bombay prohibition Act "?
I checked Baracts( in new Features )
Can I say smthin....?
Why it is coming on every page of LCI as " Done bt with error" I m really tired to see this. please clarify this.