Anonymous
05 February 2010 at 16:23
if police files a FIR under 420 and 423 and seizes a private office assets like computers , etc wht immediate relief the company can take to re open the office .
wht is the correct procedure as the complainant is hand in glove wth the police and the press . can writ petition be filed to teach the police a lesson ????
pls help we are facing atrocities of the police which are totally illegal as it is purely business related matter and comes under civil/ business law and not under IPC
mukesh
05 February 2010 at 15:26
A is a student. B somehow got his mobile and sent a mischivious SMS to a lady political worker without knowledge of A. The lady made a complain to inquire about mobile no. owner. Meanwhile an another politician in power called A and taken his signature on verious blank stamp papers forcefully and also threat A not to say anybody. After inquiry the lady files a complain against A. A is innocent and victim of work done by B. Now what can he do and overcome from the situation? What usage can be done of stamp papers against A?
banke bihari sharma
05 February 2010 at 09:37
I would like to know that if an Investigation officer of a case resolve of matter between both parties then what is the improtance of a compromise written on a plain paper of on a stamp paper duly signed by both parties and witness.
Ganesh
05 February 2010 at 09:00
A person is accused under 307. He is out on bail but his passport is kept by the court. Almost a year has passed. the court has read the charge and the accused had denied it. the proceedings are going on. Now the accused requires the passport as he has to go abroad for few days. Will he get back his passport. Are there any guidelines by Supreme court regarding this.
I had asked the above question and Hon'ble Expert Sukhija has given me this answer that The accused can apply to the concerned court for permission to go abroad and return of passport.
First of all Thanks for the answer. But my query is regarding the case of Suresh Nanda Vs C.B.I. AIR 2008 SC 1414 ( Decided on 24/01/2008)
wherein it was delivered by the Hon'ble SC that
"The Hon’ble SC has further opined that the Passports Act, 1967 being a specific Act whereas Section 104 of Cr.P.C. is a general provision for impounding any document or thing, it shall prevail over that Section in the Cr.P.C. as regards the passport. Thus, by necessary implication, impounding of a passport cannot be done by the Court under Section 104 Cr.P.C. though it can impound any other document or thing."
Is it applicable in my case
vinod bansal
04 February 2010 at 21:15
R//members
In one of my case investigating officer has prepared a totally wrong site plan.in site plan he has shown gurudwara in west direction and has shown palika bazar in east direction in fact that is in west direction. I have examined in defence a draftsman and exhibited correct site plan.Kindly provide me citation in which benefit of wrong site plan was granted to accused.Thanx n Regards
Vinod Bansal Adv.
RTI Activist
vinod bansal
04 February 2010 at 21:10
R//members
I am in need of a citation in which benefit of non production of case property was given to accused.Thanx n Regards
vinod bansal
04 February 2010 at 21:06
R/members
I am in need of a citation in which benefit of non examination of police officer who prepare report us 173 crpc (challan)was granted to accused.Thanx
vinod bansal
04 February 2010 at 21:04
R/members
I am in need of a citation in which benefit of non examination of police officer who prepare report us 173 crpc (challan)was granted to accused.Thanx
Anonymous
04 February 2010 at 16:06
Two months back my father expired, due to heart attack. He was Retd. from service 2 years ago. He was using Credit Cards and also availed Personal Loan (2 years) which he borrowed from the bank. Last week I received a call from the bank that since I am his son, I have to pay the loan amount as well as the remaining amount of the credit cards used by my father. I did not used any credit cards or taken any loan from banks nor did I used in any way the loan amount (directly or in-directly), which my father borrowed from the bank. My question is this, Can bank held me liable for the amount which my father borrowed..... and can they initiate legal action against me or my family.
He borrowed the money for the different purposes and did own any property whatsoever.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Definitions of Attempt in IPC
Kindly give the definitions of attempt