S.D. Singh
08 July 2010 at 15:16
In case of charge sheet u/s 420/467/468/471 whether C.M.M. has power to grant the bail from his own office or has to move to session court. The accused were on arrest stay by the High court and after submission of charge sheet, the CMM has issued B.W. against the accused for appearance.
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
08 July 2010 at 14:53
Sirs,
in a theft case, the investigation officer was in SUDAN , along with UN PEACE KEEPING FORCE.So,the trial court waited for him for a very long time, to come and give evidence. but, as he was in a foreign country, he could not come and depose before the court.
then the prosecutor has filed a petition to substitute the investigation officer with a head constable of the same police station and unfortunately that petition was allowed by the court and he was examined in place of investigation officer,as he knows the signature of that particular sub-inspector.
the same sub-inspector himself has arrested the accused, effected 27 recovery, conducted the investigation, and also submitted charge-sheet.
such an officer has been substituted by a totally stranger police constable ?
is there any high court / supreme court rulings against such a practice ?
salilkumar.p
advocate
thalassery-670101
advocatesalil@gmail.com
+91-9447536929
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
08 July 2010 at 14:38
Sirs,
in one of my cases, the allegation is that accused was found carrying a plasic bag, and when the police officer got suspicion, he got opened the bag and it was found to be containing " GUN POWDER " and he was arrested and a case u/s 4 of the explosive substances act was charged against him.
please explain me , whether the offence will lie ?
what are the essential ingredients of the offence ?
is it necessory that possession should be " unlawfully " and " maliciously " ?
then, what does these two words mean ?
can anybody provide me useful citations favourable to defence side ?
how can we guess whether the posiible explosion would have endangered life and property, ....when no such explosion has yet occured ?
thanks in advance,
SALIL KUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
MOB : +91-9447536929
advocatesalil@gmail.com
Anonymous
08 July 2010 at 11:34
Sir,
What is the prescribed time limit to file a criminal case related with forgery at CJM court? Plz. Suggest
Thanks & regards.
Anonymous
08 July 2010 at 08:55
kya wife ko 363 ke liye prosecute kiya ja sakta hai agar wo father ki concent ke bina bachchhon ko apne father ke yaha le jaye....
Anonymous
08 July 2010 at 01:05
My car was not moving, infact engine was also off.I stopped the car for a moment to visit bank ATM.While I opened my car door, a rikshaw banged on the door. My car was stationary but rikshw hit me from back side. A lady on rikhaw fell down and got head injury. In few seconds people took her to hospital in a different car.I was left alone on road. I left the place in 15 mins. Went to nearest hospital (Ayushman hospital) in another half an hour. Hospital reported no one came for any accidental help. I came back to home.In a days time i recieved a call from police station that a FIR is lodged against my name and have to go to court for case...Please help me ASAP...they have signed me for IPC 279 and IPC 338...AM stressed..What to do????
vinod bansal
07 July 2010 at 23:44
R/Experts
Is it permissible under law to try after clubbing two cases,one instituted on the pvt complainant of food inspector under prevention of food act and second instituted by the police after registering FIR us 272 IPC against the same accused in both cases and same incident,as for the cases of food adultration seperate provision/act has been enected by the parliament.Thanx
Anonymous
07 July 2010 at 22:00
what if a person deliberately avoids receiving notice under 138 of n.i.a. 5 times and the notice is returned back .. will it be presumed to be served??
Anonymous
07 July 2010 at 20:40
HELLO ALL LEARNED EXPERTS
I WOULD LIKE TO ADMIT THE CRIMINAL APPEAL AS ABOVE STATED SECTION CONVICTION ORDER PLS PROVIDE ME JUDGEMETNT AT THE TIME OF ADMISSION OF THE CRIMINAL APPEAL AND SUSPENSION OF ORDER
REGARDS
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
POLICE, POLITICIANS & OFFECERS HELP ACCUCE ?
RESPECTED EXPERTS!
CASE DISTT-DURG (CHHATTISGARH)
FIVE ACCUSE CHEATS MORE THAN 24 PEOPLE OF RS 1 CRORS..ON MAY 25, 2009 . POLCIE REGISTERD CASE U/S 420 406 409 34 ON 14 SEP 2009.
BUT
POLICE DO NOT INTERESTED TO TAKE ANY ACTIION AGAINST ABOVE ACCUSE. AFTER 10 MONTHD OF REGISTERD OFFECNE POLICE DID NOT FILE CHARGE SHEET .
BECAUSE THE ABOVE ACCUCE ARE RELATING BIG POLITICAL,OFFICIAL & SOME COURT MEMBERS CONNECTION.
1. WHAT WE CAN DO THE BEST FOR JUSTICE?
THANKS FOR YOUR ADVOICE