Anonymous
10 May 2011 at 14:43
Husband is driver in A.P.S.R.T.C., He was married firstly one lady. She left his society at his young age. Thereafter he married my client. Her name is incorporated in service book as nominee for his benefits. My client got four children through her husband. she is now 56 years old. All the children settled. Nobody is looking after her. Husband residing with a concubine in another village. He got purchased about Ac.8-00 guntas in the name of that concubine. He saying that his retirement benefits and other benefits will not be given to my client. Accordingly my client i.e. wife filed a domestic violence [pro] case against her husband and she made his employers as proforma parties to the case. Husband did not appear though he received notices. The employers contested the case. The case is disposed in favour of the wife and directed the husband to pay the half of the retirement benefits and maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month granted till the date of payment of the half of the retirement benefits and the court directed the employers to implement the order. The things stood so. Husband filed an appeal on the said order of the JMFC. His allegation is that the court is erred in passing the order and not directed any protection officer to file his/her report with regarding to the domestic violence incident. My query is whether the report of the protection officer is mandatory or it is directory one? please clarify and suggest any citation/s. Thanks one and all.
BASKARAN S
10 May 2011 at 12:57
A.RAJA WHO IS THE EX CABINET MINISTER OF THE PRESENT CENTRAL GOVT,HE IS THE PRIME ACCUSED OF 2G SPECTRUM CASE, TN CM'S DAUGHTER KANIMOLI ALSO ONE OF THE SHARE HOLDER OF KALAIGNAR TV IE 20% SHE IS UNDER THE SURVAILLANCE OF CBI, BUT TN CM'S ONE OF THE WIFE MRS DAYALU GOT 60% SHARE OF THE SAID TV BUT THE INVESTIGATING AGENCY FIX THE DAUGHTER IS ACCUSED WIFE IS WITNESS, THE AFORESAID TWO PERSONS ARE DOING CONSPRACY, BUT THE INVESTIGATING AGENCY SERVED SUMMONS ONLY TO DAUGHTER. WHETHER IT IS ANY OFFICIAL BIAS.
Anonymous
10 May 2011 at 12:25
I am the Complainant. Accused has been granted permanent exemption, on the ground that he is busy person, has to travel to court and I didn't file say to his exemption application. What remedy -case laws /sections???
Thanks
Munish Kumar Garg
09 May 2011 at 23:10
Hello members
In my case the FIR was got registered U/s 498, 307, 34 IPC against Husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law on the charge that they gave poisonous substance to complainant/wife and she was forced to take it, as her parents was not able to fulfill the dowry demands of her husbands family members.
The FIR was registered and the husband was arrested on that basis but the father-in-law and mother-in-law was granted bail in the case.
As in the contents of FIR it was specifically dictated to the police by the complainant that father-in-law and mother-in-law had jointly hold the hands of complainant and the posion was administrated by her husband, but the learned Sessions Court grant Anticipatory Bail to both father-in-law and mother-in-law on the basis that they were of near about 60 years of age and how they can assist/help for administrating the posion to the complainant.
So please provide me some latest case-law on this point by which the bail already granted to them get be cancelled.
Thanks in advance.
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
09 May 2011 at 20:50
Dear Experts
The muslim parent want to claim their child from adoptive parent u/s 21 of DV act. [ adoption deed made- it was legally not valid) but adoptive parents got guardianship order from Dist Court.
In this position its possible to claim their child u/s 21 of DV act
prashant pundhir
09 May 2011 at 20:34
Dear Experts,
I am handling a case of bank van robbery i.e. of 394,395,396,307I.P.C.,25/27A.act and the case is that the victims looted a bank van carrying the cash of 5 crore rupees .Inside the van,there is a security guard with two more employees having the licensed weapon but no one tried to secure the cash and not a single fire was done from inside the van .The only way for the defence was to mold the whole charges towards the bank staff and the security guard and I adopted that .Now the case is almost on the final stage .The statements of 313cr.p.c have been recorded .
Now the problem is that the bank also started to suspect on its innocent staff and suspended the security guard and the other employees .Is there any way to protect those innocent persons ?
Anonymous
09 May 2011 at 20:21
What is the procedure for getting order sheets (day to day) from a CBI Spl. Court. Can a third person i.e a Publicc get it?
Anant
09 May 2011 at 18:43
Sir,
I am a tenant in respect of a flat in kolkata and my landlord in trying to evict me have taken criminal steps in past and he was arrested also. Recently in my place fire took place thrice for unknown reasons and every time I along with my family were saved by grace of God.
Can I take any criminal action against the landlord and if yes what?
Anant
Anonymous
09 May 2011 at 16:47
Sir,
Recently there was an attempt on my life by Sister's son and he was booked under Sec 307, 323 AND 506. The concerned Police Station I/O could not apprehend the accused and was absconding 45 days have elapsed still absconding. When I approached the Police Station they told me that they are searching for him. No investigation have been done since the compliant is given by my son my statement was not recorded in the FIR.
Sir, When the accused will be arrested. I am the victim and my statement is not recorded by Police Station.
Kindly advise me I will be grateful for your kind advise.
Thanking you,
M.S.N.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
N.I.Act- Account Blocked
A plot was booked with PSG Developers by paying considerable amount. However, the Developer was not having the land and they refunded the deposited amount by two cheques which were bounced on deposit by me in my Bank. The reason for return of cheques was ‘ACCOUNT BLOCKED’ of the Developer. I had served the Notice in time and also filed the case in time under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act with the Court. All ingradients of Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act attract my case except that the Developer was having sufficient funds in his account which was BLOCKED. Kindly guide me whether my case falls under Section 138 of N.I.Act as the payment was not received even on issuing Notice. Also quote some cases on the Account Blocked.