1 socitery registered under Socitey act which consist of people who dnt believe in god...they form a clg and recived grant in aid...they select a principal on their on choice who being a member of tht socitey after giving advertisement for pricipal...one of the eligible candidate file a case...govt took away the grant in aid as saying violation of the ir policy as maladministration.
University replied tht they being a minority may take any decision. govt thn ask to prove the same.National Minority Commission said not a minority as dosnt believe on relgion...than plea is made to Human Right Commission they approved the minority status and asked to resume grant in aid . Gzovt didnt accept the same
therefore writ bfre the sc U/A 32 of Constitution
I AM ASKING TO ALL ADVOCATES OF INDIA WHY JUDGES ARE APPOINTIG AFTER THEIR LEGALLY RETIREMENT? NO OTHER DEPARTMENT ARE FOLLOWING THIS TYPE OF ILLEGAL AND AGAINST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. RETIRED DESTRICT JUDGES HASBEEN APPOINTED ,RETIRED HIGH COURT AND SUPREMECOURT JUDGES ALSO REAPPOINTED SOMEWHERE AFTER THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RETIREMENT AGE?
ONCE RETIRE ALWAYES RETIRE IS THE POLICY AND RULE IN OUR COUNTRY THEN WHY JUDICIARY IS EXEMPTED?WHAT IS PARLIAMENT DOING?AND WAHT IS ALL SENIOR DOING WHY THEY COULD NOT OPPOSED THIS POLICY?
Dear friends,
Writ petitions are decided mostly on the basis of affidavits.
Under what provision of Law affidavits are admissible in evidence ?
Further,is Evidence Act applicable to petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution ?
in relation to my query of fundamental rights-freedom oe speech and expression, i also want to know what does the military law says on this
i was under trainee in indian military academy,dehradun to be an army officer,on 18 dec2009 i have been withdrawn from academy on discipline grounds but i was not given a chance to speak up my for my case,i was withdrawn just merely for meagre punishments which are a routine in academy,most of them were forced on me by my coy cdr,i was not allowed to speak in the march-up as well,where as per guidelines a) i should be given a show cause notice before withdrawal b)a court of inquiry should be held to investigate into the charges c)a chance to be given to a cadet to explain his conduct d) benefit of doubt should accrue to a cadet, but as per academys modus-operandi i was not even allowed to speak. my question is Is this is a violation of my fundamental rights- freedom of speech and expression?
Can a director of a Pvt. Ltd. Co. In which chairman of nagar palika is also a director enter into a tender process and if he enters then what are the consequences?
Please reply with relevant section of up nagar palika act.
Landlord broke open my Shop & stole my all materials. I lodged Complaint at Police Station. Till the FIR not registered. Can I write to Magistrate & ask to order Police to take Lawful Action on my Complaint. Let me get some idea.
Thanks
KHChand
In which act it is said that if we submit the affidavit to the high court or high court related matters we have to start the first line of drafting of the affidavit as "In the matter of & in which act it is said that if we dont have to submit the affidavit in high court or high court related matters we have to start the first line of drafting of the affidavit as "In the matter of the petition of
What do u mean by every affidavit shall be drawn up in the first person.(if the abovementioned line is written under the affidavit for any purpose).
Pls forward any case laws if any
Thanking u all experts in advances
If the state government says that the tax on any things will be rs. 200 as an example but as per the Indian consitution, 1949 the tax should not be more than 100 so which tax rate should be followed?
Meaning of pecuniary limits as per section 6 of the civil procedure code, 1908 & what the section says.
Pls give the case laws if any
Thanking u all experts in advance.
contenmpt of court order
High court has given order.
No time limit is given to follow the order.
After how many days we can do the contenmpt of court order in such case.