awadhesh khadiwala
04 September 2011 at 17:21
whether a civilian can be called in parliament for his act done out of parliament. whether notices issued to kiran bedi ,Arvind & Prashant bhushan are valid.
Anonymous
04 September 2011 at 13:54
hi dear members i want your advice:-
my client owns a commercial property in an area but just opposite to that property there is a 80 ft road and there are certain jhuggis on the road which have illegally encroached the road as we as the footpath.
those jhuggis have encroached the footpath and have opened there shops on the foot path itsef..
due to this my clients bussiness is getting affected and the value of his property is diminished.
kindly suggest what relief can i take from the court and how?
i have already sent RTI letters but no proper reply has come.
kaushal sharma
04 September 2011 at 10:47
I was appointed on the post of Assit. Prof. in university in 2003by facing an interview before the duly constituted selection committee and on the basis of its recommendation, the appointment order given to me. the advertisement for the post was on 'contract'but the appointment order was of 'regular nature'. the univ. gives paysclae, HRA, DA and other benefit to me except Yearly increments.I filed a Writ in High court and intimate the univ. with notice, but as a counterblast they terminate me without any justifies order.i filed another writ in high court. in return of the univ. said the appointment was on CONTRACT. the case lasts for 4 year and then decided. court orderd me to give proper representation to the univ. and the univ. will give reasoned order with in 2 months. the univ. failed to respond by 4 months. hence contempt of court filed by me. then after a month univ. replied that i was not eligible at the time of appointment since i was not having master's degree.
My argument is- I have possesses M.Ed. (Master's degree)and never hide the facts at any time to the selection committee. as per UGC rules, Master degree in relevent sub. required. M.Ed. is the master's degree in teacher training programme. and
after such a long time no one can challebge and alter the norms and the recommendations of selection committee. if i was not qualified, how selection committee recommended my name and in other hand, when i was selected by the committee, i was qualified.
Pl. give your opinion.....
nishant gahlawat
03 September 2011 at 20:29
respected sirs,if in a public body an ineligible candidate is selected by the selection board.what are legal options
available with aggrrieved person.
J. K. SASTRY
03 September 2011 at 18:32
RESPECTED LEGAL GIANTS !
NAMASKARAMS.
I JUST SAW ON TWITTER WHEREIN MADAM KIRAN BEDI HAS TWEETED STATING THAT SHE IS PREPARING FOR THE PRIVILEGE MOTION IN PARLIAMENT. SHE TWEETED THAT SHE WANTS HER KNOWLEDGE BASE UPDATED AS TO HOW TO GO ABOUT IT.
I AM NOT INTELLIGENT TO THAT EXTENT. BUT I TOUCH YOUR FEET AND PRAY THAT IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO ADVISE, PRAY HELP HER IN "www.kiranbedi.com" IN THE 'FEEDBACK' PORTION.
I SINCERELY FEEL THAT PARLIAMENTARIANS ARE TAKING REVENGE UPON THIS CHARISMATIC LADY, AND FOR THAT PURPOSE ON ALL ANNA-GROUP.
FOR ANY HELP FROM YOU, I SHALL BE HIGHLY BEHOLDEN TO YOU.
WITH REGARDS,
J.K.SASTRY
Anonymous
03 September 2011 at 13:29
Is there any differance between article 19 (1)(g) and 301 of indian constitution?
Anonymous
03 September 2011 at 11:20
dear sir/madam,
Husband after marriying left wife within 4 months and not able to trace the person, can the wife approach the high court through HCP
Anonymous
03 September 2011 at 09:12
I have asked some information (12 items) relating to my service in the organisation in which I am employed. I have asked this information stating that "I am a citizen of India and seeking the information as a citizen". The SPIO informed me that the employee can not seek information from the organisation in which he is employed. Kindly clarify whether the SPIO's reply is in accordance with the RTI Act 2005 and suggest me how to proceed further in the matter. Any High Court / Supreme Court has given such ruling.
PARTHA SARKAR
02 September 2011 at 23:32
Being aggrieved can an individual file writ petition against any order passed by the State Information Commission (after hearing) under Right To Information Act, 2005?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Privileges of parliamentarians
Dear Experts ,
I want to know the following and set the ball rolling for discussion : -
Two points are to be discussed with regard to the Privileges of the Parliamentarians : -
(i) Their actions and conduct in Parliament is ' NON JUSTICIABLE' i.e. they cannot be tried in a court of law or in a simple sense No FIR can be lodged against them of whatever they say in Parliament .
(ii) Their conduct in Parliament cannot be criticised. Is their conduct in Parliament ABOVE CRITICISM ? If this is so then this Right is stretching TOO FAR . That means they are free to do whatever they say and do in Parliament and cannot be CRITICISED.
If that is so what happens to the Fundamental Right of Right to Expression enshrined in the Constitution .
What happens to the LIVE TELECAST being made of the Parliament Proceedings . Does it mean We see everything but CANNOT SPEAK ABOUT IT WHATEVER HAPPENS.
What happens to the Cartoonists , Article Writers , Print and TV Media.
Lot of Criticism is made of the Prime Minister whatever he speaks in Parliament .
It seems , in my opinion , The Breach of Privilege Motion to Anna Hazare team is frivolous.
To air Public perception or even one's Own views cannot be held to be Breach of Privilege. When the Parliamentarians are acting Publicly (Live telecast) they cannot and SHOULD NOT AND ARE NOT ENTITLED ,BY OUR CONSTITUTION, TO say You cannot criticise our actions.
The Constitutional Experts can give their advise as this is Interpretation of the Constitution.
With regards ,
Suresh Godbole , 0-9929596546 , JAIPUR