NAVDEEP SINGH SRAN
31 August 2011 at 17:46
In Rajiv Gandhi assassination case,SC give their decision,President reject mercy plea but today chennai (madras)HC stay on death sentence against the decision of SC & president.How it is possible
Anonymous
30 August 2011 at 09:41
Nature of Writ petition under Article 32.
Whether Writ under Article 226 is maintainable under Article 32. please describe.
Anonymous
29 August 2011 at 17:58
Please let me know about the mofa act carpet area bill amendmentse
C.NOWSHAD
27 August 2011 at 21:13
IF ANY BODY KNOWS THE RECENT JUDGEMENT OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN FAVOUR OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION...
Anonymous
27 August 2011 at 20:11
Dear Sir,
one employee working in central university always absconds from his duty after marked present in register. Last Friday I called his superior asking whether he is present on that day. If present, why he was not present on his seat.Why that employee absconding from his duty if he was marked present on that day.
His superior argued with me saying that whom I am to question him? He says that employee can roam anywhere in the campus or he can roam outside the campus. I cannot keep CCTV cameras to find where employee going and track him!!! Finally he says that I have not seen him ,may be he is not present.
Actually that Employee on most of Fridays will not be present after signing in register. I have found him that he stays out of his campus on his personal work.He do most of his personal work on Fridays. I have asked Employee present details on that days through RTI.But, to my surprise he was marked present on that days . I have sent complaint but no use.
Can plz help me in framing RTI questions so that I can red-handedly caught him?? What is the strategy I CAN USE???!!
gowtham
26 August 2011 at 22:09
can supremecourt direct president of india to call for a joint session of parliment and table cag report ?
if yes how?? ,
can a direction be issued to cabinet to consider anna hazares version of lokpal bill ?
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 21:30
The employer had filed recall application against the ex- parte award of the labour court without mentioning the act under which the recall application had been filed not by the party but by the authorized representative of the company simple plain paper without affidavit and without delay condone application after 30 days of publication.
However it is pertinent to mention here that the award is not ex-parte as the company has filed w/s, rejoinder affidavit, refused to file documents ad absented itself deliberately in management witness and arguments. It has also filed various interlocutory applications/ objections rejected before passing award under the direction of high court to decide the issue at earliest.
Now challenging before the writ court the award, the recall application which was rejected under the state act while the reference order is in the central act.
Is this issue will have any serious implication in the writ court?
How this issue should be argued before the writ court?
Is there any ruling in support of submission.
Let me know.
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 19:22
Artilce 311 & Section 21 is applicable to every judge, Magistrate, PP , Additional PP , Assisstant PP , Chief Justice Of india & Chief Justice Of Every HC. Support the answer with the case law & opinion are welocmed.
Also what does civil services mean as per artilce 311 any case law.
thanks
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 14:57
Article 311 in The Constitution Of India 1949
311. Dismissal, removal or reduction in rank of persons employed in civil capacities under the Union or a State
(1) No person who is a member of a civil service of the Union or an all India service or a civil service of a State or holds a civil post under the Union or a State shall be dismissed or removed by a authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed
(2) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges Provided that where it is proposed after such inquiry, to impose upon him any such penalty, such penalty may be imposed on the basis of the evidence adduced during such inquiry and it shall not be necessary to give such person any opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed: Provided further that this clause shall not apply
(a) where a person is dismissed or removed or reduced in rank on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge; or
(b) where the authority empowered to dismiss or remove a person or to reduce him in rank ins satisfied that for some reason, to be recorded by that authority in writing, it is not reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry; or
(c) where the President or the Governor, as the case may be, is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not expedient to hold such inquiry
(3) If, in respect of any such person as aforesaid, a question arises whether it is reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry as is referred to in clause ( 2 ), the decision thereon of the authority empowered to dismiss or remove such person or to reduce him in rank shall be final.
Query: As per above artilce what does civil services means does it cover any police officer or any rank, Minister, MLA in short how are covered under the civil services words all so what do u mean by goverment officials.
Case law required to understand more about the goverment officials & civil services.
Also it has been said that a under artilce 311 of the above to allow termination of services on charges of corrupt practice after begining of trial in competent court or after the competent court has has proved the accused guilty & has been proved as convicted. case law required.
can we say section 21 of the IPC Public servant comes under Artilce 311 of the COnsitution of India, 1949.
any case law which say yes that section 21 of the IPC Public servant comes under Artilce 311 of the COnsitution of India, 1949. ORRRRRRRR Artilce 311 covers section 21 of the IPC.
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
For appointment in govt. job
Can a person facing trial, eligible for Government job. and tell me what is the definition of convict. a person facing trial come in category of conviction. A person bonded before two year by tehsildar comes in category of conviction.