Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Abhishek Bhagotia   05 May 2012 at 11:43

Professional tax

Please advice on the definition of professional tax ? It is a local tax levied on public servant by municipality. This will include all types of employees (clerks also) or there can be only a specific group. Can local body make such over reaching bye law? At present it includes even peons & clerks.

anuruddh kumar   04 May 2012 at 20:05

Sub junior activity

my friend is medical officer , his junior pharmasist make absen atleast twice in a week , and then after coming he got his signature. my friends senior is favouring that pharmasist, wat my friend sud do

Member (Account Deleted)   04 May 2012 at 15:00

Wrong information under rti

Dear Sir,

Kindly let me know if there is any govt. officer giving wrong information under RTI Act then what we can do.

I have recieved such wrong information from Assistant Police Commisioner of UP ( Dist- Siddharth Nagar).

I want to do complaint against this officers.

Pls. advice me.

lissing perme   02 May 2012 at 15:57

Precedence value of supreme court assumption in judegment

Respected Experts,

What is precedence value of supreme court assumption while delivering the judgment.Do this assumption have binding effect on lower court.

Ajay Itakikar   29 April 2012 at 17:01

Ninth schedule

How may I know that which law is incorporated into Ninth Schedule of The Constitution of India i.e. a particular law inserted before or after 23rd April 1973 to get an effect of a judgment by SC in IR Coelho case.

lissing perme   29 April 2012 at 11:10

Judgement copy

Respected Experts,

Sincerely requesting for uploading of juegement copy of Guahati High Court in

" Hament Bharali & Others Vs State of Assam & Others",

in which Hon'able Court Upheld the examinee right to inspect the evaluated answerscript in examination.

Thanks in Advance.

lissing perme   27 April 2012 at 16:23

Intented to use life and liberty clause in rti application.

Respected Experts,

Fact of the case is that our state(Arunachal Pradesh) Public Service Commission is not allowing the unsuccessful candidates to get their marks in written examination.However previous year they do so by taking IPO of Rs 25 as a cost of Marksheet.This year Commission is saying that the unsucessful candidates will allow to see their marksheet only after compliation of exam. i.e. after viva-voice,which according to commission to be conduct on 15/04/2012.Now my problem is that if I filled normal Rti application I 'll certain get the desire marksheet only after the complication of examination,as they will take full 30 days of RTI rule. So I want to use'life and liberty clause' so that I and other unsuccessful candidates could able to get the marks of written examination before viva-voice .

Thereby requesting help and guidance from members.
Thank's in advance

lissing perme   27 April 2012 at 16:20

Written examination mark

Respect Experts,

Can PIO of State Public Service Commission denied/withhold the information(mark square in written exam by unsuccessful candidates) till the conduct of viva-voice of the successful candidates.
Pliz expained with relevant rule/law.
Thank's in advance

Anuj jain   27 April 2012 at 08:39

Can non advocate (ordinary person) represent in court of law

Yes, it is very much possible for a person to appear his own case in person or authorise any other person who is non-advocate to represent his case.

Explanation:-

THERE IS an old saying that it is the wearer who knows where the shoe pinches. So if you are an aggrieved or an affected party, and feel that you have a strong case to contest in the court of law, you are the better person who can plead the case and put forth your view point with authority, no matter whether you are an advocate or not. As a petitioner in person, you have a primary right to contest any of your civil or criminal case even without engaging an advocate.

According to Sunil Sethi, former president of Jammu Bar association, it is not necessary at all for a petitioner to engage a lawyer. In fact, an advocate is just a substitute and under order Three of Civil Procedure Code, an advocate is an attorney - a person appointed to act for the petitioner.

Sethi says that to appear in person in the court, one doesn’t require a law degree at all. “Even the petitioner can engage another person to plead the case. That other person also doesn’t require to be a lawyer. Simply, in such a case the permission of the court is required.

If a petitioner doesn’t have resources to engage a lawyer or cannot also plead of his own, in such case, he can approach Legal Aid committee who can engage an advocate for the petitioner on government expenses. These Legal Aid committees are at district level (headed by Sessions Judge) and at state level, headed by a judge of a High Court.

Sethi says that if a person wants to plead the case of his own, he doesn’t need to put on an advocate’s uniform. Further, if he can not write the writ petition, the same can be drafted by engaging an advocate, but the case in the court can be pleaded by the petitioner himself, if he wishes so.

It is not also necessary to engage an advocate for the entire case till it comes to its logical conclusion. “Even the petitioner has the right to change the advocate and engage another at any stage of case, opines senior Jammu and Kashmir High Court advocate SS Anand Lehar.

Dwelling upon criminal cases, Lehar says that no trial begins before an accused is given an opportunity to engage a lawyer. In case the accused is not in a position or doesn’t want to engage a lawyer, the court is bound to give him the services of an ‘Amicus Curie’- an advocate who will be asked by the Court to represent the case and the money for the same will be borne by the court.

If the accused neither engages the advocate nor takes the services of ‘Amicus Curie’, the Judge will be in that case himself examining the witness. Even the accused himself has the right to cross-examine the witnesses.

While giving reference of the law, Lehar says that under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution (seeking safeguard of life and liberty of an individual), even a foreigner can approach Indian Courts and that too without an advocate. Even those who have illegally come to India or detained after crossing the border, can seek justice under this provision and can plead for liberty if detained beyond the period of detention.

So the next time, when you are engaged in any legal dispute, be it a consumer case, a civil or a matrimonial dispute, if you are sure that you can plead the case of your own, you have the right to appear before the judge - but remember, maintaining the dignity of the court is everybody’s prime duty.

kalpana   25 April 2012 at 20:30

Weights and measures act

my query is action was initiated under the standards of weights and measures act against which a writ petition was filed. the same is pending. now a new enactment has come replacing the old act. now which act will apply to a pending case. case law on this would be appreciated.