Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

anil verma (registeronlyfree)   06 October 2012 at 10:03

Evidence on record.

Sir,
If the judges of High Court are not looking into the evidence provided with preconceived mind stating that petitioner has got the first right to say and you are respondent.
that how can we bring into the notice the evidence on record.
It appears there is an allergy to see-hear evidence provided which is resulting into the miscarriage of justice.
non of my lawyers are allowed to say anything before getting satisfactory reply of the statement given by the petitioner company.
if an aggrieved is poor and he cannot appeal to S.C then what is the remedy.

ROJA shree   05 October 2012 at 08:28

Cprc 482 & mandamus

Sir,
what is the difference between S.482 Crpc & writ of mandamus? pls I need the answer in detail

Abhishek Mawle   03 October 2012 at 16:54

Voting in mla, mp, counselor & mlc elections

I stay at Bhopal for some months in a year with my parents and for some months with my wife and child at Nasik. In which constituency can I vote for MLA, MP, Counselor and MLC elections.

shekar hkes   03 October 2012 at 00:45

Dual citizenship

can indian national have dual citizenship

if its illegal what are the punishiment ?

anil verma (registeronlyfree)   02 October 2012 at 21:23

Remand of labour matter to labour court for the second time on same issue after 18 years.

Sir,
i being medical representative, a sales promotion employee, against a exparte order of labour court on preliminary issue of workman, i approached honble' high court, which after 4 years held to be workman remanded the case to the labour court to decide it on merits within six months. but after years the case was decided on merits because at the last end of hearing the employer deliberately chooses not to appear and hence ex-parte award. against which recall application was filed which was also rejected in between the proceedings the issues were framed and these six issues ane after the other was challenged before hon'ble high court before the final award of labour court after concealing material facts in the recall application. there after the award was challenged before high court in year 2009 and was stayed till further order on the issue of workman which has attained finality and holding labour court has jurisdiction to hear the case. now before the high court last month evaluating the order of preliminary issue of coordinate bench my award has again been remanded back to the labour court after 15 years for the second time on the same issue making me where i was 15 years back. while the award was stayed i was neither reinstated nor compliance of 17=B was done and my application of 2009 of 17-B is still pending.
i am poor person now what is the effective remedy for me please suggest?
my entire family is under depression and tension.
pl provide maximum and effective suggestions together with some lawyer who can take up my case in lowest amount.

antariksh verma   02 October 2012 at 20:01

Remand of labour matter to labour court for the second time on same issue after 18 years.

Sir,
i being medical representative, a sales promotion employee, against a exparte order of labour court on preliminary issue of workman, i approached honble' high court, which after 4 years held to be workman remanded the case to the labour court to decide it on merits within six months. but after years the case was decided on merits because at the last end of hearing the employer deliberately chooses not to appear and hence ex-parte award. against which recall application was filed which was also rejected in between the proceedings the issues were framed and these six issues ane after the other was challenged before hon'ble high court before the final award of labour court after concealing material facts in the recall application. there after the award was challenged before high court in year 2009 and was stayed till further order on the issue of workman which has attained finality and holding labour court has jurisdiction to hear the case. now before the high court last month evaluating the order of preliminary issue of coordinate bench my award has again been remanded back to the labour court after 15 years for the second time on the same issue making me where i was 15 years back. while the award was stayed i was neither reinstated nor compliance of 17=B was done and my application of 2009 of 17-B is still pending.
i am poor person now what is the effective remedy for me please suggest?
my entire family is under depression and tension.
pl provide maximum and effective suggestions together with some lawyer who can take up my case in lowest amount.

AMANDEEP SINGH   02 October 2012 at 00:02

Sro 43

sir i want to take benefit of sro 43 as my father has died in service in sericulture deptt. as deputy director. i have done my graduation in electronics and comm. engg. and i want junior assistant level post in my concerning field.what shall i do to get the same ?

ornate   01 October 2012 at 17:31

Obc list

Respected, Experts

we live in the Gujarat state in Amreli District. we are belong to muslim (molesalam) Rajput community since 1700 bc we have great history of our cast we were came from the Rajasthan. Right now we live like simply muslim we are just 1000 population in gujarat we have no much agriculture land. Our financially and socially condition are so poor. Our youngster need job in government sector cause most of the youngster doing Driving and labour work cause of that our community going to darkness our cast name is 'SETA'. we r not in the Gujarat or Indian cast list or any other general cast list of india. we have election card, ration card, but we have't our cast indentity. we have no future. we need our constitutional right we need our nationality ... pleas Help us

Aman   29 September 2012 at 23:02

Can certain provisions of a state encated act prevail over a central act.

If a State has enacted an Act with respect to one of the matters in the Concurrent List (with due assent from the President) after the enactment of a Central act and if certain provision of the State Act are more stringent than those provided in the Central Act. Then can the State Act prevail over the Central Act? (owing to the bare provision of Article 254(2) )
And please do provide some case laws substantiating the same.