If a Company is incorporated with the name "XYZ Consultancy Pvt. Ltd." can it do non-consultancy activities indicated in the incidental objects clause of the Company?
Good Morning Experts
According to section 24 read with 27 of Central Act No 22 of 2005 of RTI Act, 2005, the nodal ministry of Government of India have notified certain security organisations established by Central Government. On perusal Second Schedule, the nodal ministry have notified banking institutions and as such it is requested to indicate whether the banking institutions can/may invoke any clause(s)/section(s) of Central Act of RTI in the absence of publication of gazette notification by the nodal ministry duly granting exemptions to the banking institutions. It is also not clear whether the banks have been exempted subsequently as required under relevant act in question
Dr Mahesh
17 September 2012 at 19:09
Under present circumstances, it has become very necessary to allow the Election Commission to use "RIGHT TO REJECT" during the forthcoming General Election in 2014. We know that an electoral reform is one way to achieve this but majority of MP are not inclined to support it for personnel reasons.
Now we have to explore alternatives ways to direct the EC to use "RIGHT TO REJECT" during the forthcoming General Election in 2014.
May I request the eminent layers to suggest various ways and a best strategy to follow to achieve our aim to use "RIGHT TO REJECT" during the forthcoming General Election in 2014?
Kindly refer to GUJARAT HIGH COURT WEB SITE,
GUST(GUJARAT University Services Tribunal Ordered in Favour of Complainant applicant,VNSGU(SURAT) Went to same Tribual for Review it & STAYED order to Move to GUJHC Rejected by same TRIBUNAL with Stern Comment that JUDGEMENT delivered Could not be STAYED for a MOMENT(2003),Till VNSGU(SURAT) Went to GUJHC & How GUJHC admitted case despite TRIBUNAL "NO" to VNSGU is best know to GUJHC.NOW the Delivered Justice Challenge in GUJHC since Decade Through Various CA 4738/2004,1392/2005(Justice Quereshi Ordered Final Hearing in 7/2005)CA 4049/2006 Contrary Judgement No need to expedite matters,Similarly CA9844/2011 same Justice ignore CA,KINDLY Provide Your Valuable feedback for How to move to Get DELIVERED JUSTICE Honoured & Judgement from GUJHC & Suggest Me Lawyers Firm in Ahmedabad.Thanks & Regards, Prakashp
madusa
12 September 2012 at 12:44
is it possible a person can marriage with his
mother's sister's daughter.
ONE COMPANY ADVERTISE THEIR NAME IN THE BACKSIDE OF THE NATIONAL FLAG
MY QUSTIONS ARE
1 WHETHER ANY COMPLAINT LODGED AGAINST THAT COMPANY BEFORE POLICE?
2.WHETHER I FILE A PIL AGAINST THEM
3.ANY TIME LIMIT IS BARRED AGAINST THAT COMPANY.
State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission rejected the plea on ground of limitation without speaking order. NCDRC found it arbitrary and send to SCDRC for afresh adjudication. SCDRC rejected again on ground of limitation with a speaking order that the petitioner approached to Insurance Ombudsmen and IRDA for adjudication but having no fruit, appeared before SCDRC. NOW can Writ is maintainable in this case in High Court? AND/OR is there any judgement which shows the condone in similar case ?
sajan kumar bhagat
07 September 2012 at 02:49
sir pls answer this query. i m in a bit of confusion regarding the category to which i belong.the caste mentioned in my khatiyan is "byahut kalwar".now the problem is that kalwar is recognised as an obc in the central list of obcs of ncbc for jharkhand, but byahut is not.however byahut kalwar and kalwar are the same as far as i have the knowledge of it. kindly help sir.what should i do
where theirs no statutary law the policy made in that regard by the central govrnment pevail ? any citation?
and if there is no statutory provision in regard to that state then can that policy prevail ? any citation ?
Abt simple meaning.......
" nevertheless that public interest may be outweighed by some other countervailing public interest which favour disclosure."
can any 1 convert this in simple laymans word...:)