confidential2777
20 July 2010 at 10:06
dear friends,
my one of family member was a govt.servant, But right now SLP pending in suprerme court and he is sole respondent in SLP.
would u like to give me some name and contact details of some senior counseller of Supreme court.
i tried to get it in directory, by way of internate but the contact details which are shown in website is not updatd.
anybody would like to help me, plese solve my query by giving me right guidence.
Gulshan Tanwar
18 July 2010 at 23:00
1950-2010 ---- There should not be any reserved category as per the constitution. As 60 years had elapsed and the will of the state had come to an end. Opinions please!
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
17 July 2010 at 23:10
I would like to bring to your kind attention about the District Judge (Entry Level) recruitment notification, which has been issued by the Public (Special.A) Department, Government of Tamilnadu on 01.07.2010. In that notification it is mentioned that the applicant must be practicing on the date of notification as an advocate.
I further state that the Article 233 of the Constitution of India states as follows
"Appointment of district judges.- (1) Appointments of persons to be , and the posting and promotion of, district judges in any State shall be made by the Governor of the state in consultation with the High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to such State.
(2)A person not already in the service of the Union or of the State shall only be eligible to be appointed a district judge if he has been for not less than seven years an advocate or pleader and is recommended by the High Court for appointment."
In the above said Article it is clearly stated that a person who is not in the Union or the State service and has been advocate for minimum 7 years, is eligible to be appointed as District Judge. As per the Constitution the eligibility is 7 years experience as an advocate and he need not be an advocate at the time of appointment.
At this juncture, in the rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Services (Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, 2007 (G.O. Ms. No. 79, Home (Cts.IA), 19th January 2007)the sentence "Must be practicing on the date of Notification as an Advocate" is purely violation of the Constitution of India and Ultra Virus.
Therefore, I wish to prevent the Constitutional violation and act of Ultra virus, and we want to take step to repeal the sentence "Must be practicing on the date of Notification as an Advocate" from the Tamil Nadu Judicial Services (Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, 2007 (G.O. Ms. No. 79, Home (Cts.IA), 19th January 2007) and cancel the notification of the Public(Special.A) Department, Government of Tamilnadu, dated 01.07.2010 KIndly give your suggessions and interpretation also.
srikanth
17 July 2010 at 22:48
Hi all
In our area(Hyderabad,kukatpally) we are having different situation....all shopvalas are not accepting 5 rupee notes..can they deny like that..can we any action on them like complaining to police..pls help me on this
Anonymous
17 July 2010 at 16:38
In a case wher PARTIES ARE from two differrent location enters in a agreement at DELHI for a property which is situated at GHAZIABAD and mentioning in arbitration clause THAT the place of arbitration proceedings SHALL BE HISSAR and the jurisdiction of CHANDIGARH court shall have exclusive jurisdiction due to common branch office of both parties.
Kindly answer these questions?
1. where should we file application for section 9 and thereafter for sec.11?
2. Whether the CHANDIGARH COURT can be a place for interpretation of agreement?
3. Whether the court where document was executed can entertain ANY APPLICATION OR PETITION?
Anonymous
17 July 2010 at 16:30
Dear All
I want to know that in a lease deed where the arbitration clause ids mentioned for referring all the disputes and differences arose between the parties in respect of the agreement -the matter shall be decided as per arbitration concilation act
In this situation if there is a clause that on the expiration of the period of agreement sthe lesse shall vacate the property peacefully - but lessee intentionaaly after the period is not vacating the property and saying what ever rent you want tocharge we are ready to pay and depositing the enhance rent more than market value in my account with out renewing the deed/my permission.
Let me tell that for eviction purpose where should we go either in arbitration or civil suit for eviction? and what grounds?
Anonymous
17 July 2010 at 11:55
i construct building which completed on september 2007 . muncipalties allot completion certificate on 15 september 2007. in that building two flate owner get possession from me on date 14 october 2007.but final sale dead is registered on 10 october 2008 where clearly mention that he take possession of flate on 14 october 2007 in this building society is not form because of dispute on monthly maintenance cost .this flate owner is police constable both give harrasement me , both filed consumer complaint in maharashtra against me on date 15 june 2010.consumer court accept his complaint & send me notice, in complaint he say 20 sq feet area is less provided , dampness on wall,etc. please give me help against this harrasement
Anonymous
17 July 2010 at 11:52
i construct building which completed on september 2007 . muncipalties allot completion certificate on 15 september 2007. in that building two flate owner get possession from me on date 14 october 2007.but final sale dead is registered on 10 october 2008 where clearly mention that he take possession of flate on 14 october 2007 in this building society is not form because of dispute on monthly maintenance cost .this flate owner is police constable both give harrasement me , both filed consumer complaint in maharashtra against me on date 15 june 2010.consumer court accept his complaint & send me notice, in complaint he say 20 sq feet area is less provided , dampness on wall,etc. please give me help against this harrasement
PRAVEEN CHOUDHARY
16 July 2010 at 16:04
what is the interpretation of the judgement?
some points
1. whether interview of the all the candidates will be conducted a fresh?
2. whether interview of the only of those candidates which come inside after revising of result acc. raw marks?
hon, ble court said result null and void.
result=marks obtained in wriiten examination+marks obtained in interveiw.
how interview is constitutional according rajasthjan public service commisiion?
kindly reply.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Public Interest Litigation
Is any jurisdiction clause applicable to file PIL under article 226 in High Court or in any high court will file PIL?