Parthasarathi Loganathan
08 December 2010 at 19:25
Professional Education after enrollment as BE or BL students could not be completed by various students due to employment, ill-health transfer out of State, etc. University of Madras has now stopped conducting exams for arrears papers. Many students have now approached to give ONE FINAL opportunity to earn a professional degree. University has declined the request though they have accepted the representations for conduct of M.L. Degree exams by accepting penalty of Rs.30000/- each from all old candidates. My Query:
1. Are there any provisions in law which would make these students to establish their Rights to professional education?
2. What are the options available to these students to direct the university to conduct exams.
3. Though they have already paid one-time penalty of Rs.25000/- as demanded by the University during June 2010, University have never mentioned that it is final chance to appear for arrears exams misleading the students to skip appearance for few subjects anticipating another chance. Can this decision be challenged in the court of law? Whether suit is main-tenable?
4. What are legal options left to such pathetic students who are deprived to write exams for few pending subjects?
5. Can University take such a draconian decision to deny students gaining a professional degree?
6. If they have accepted for M.L. Degree, why it is not applicable to UG degrees for law and engineering?
Experts to quote citations and specific provisions of law to support their arguments. Thanks in Advance
Anonymous
05 December 2010 at 11:03
HI, GOOD MORNING FRIENDS
PLEASE ANY ONE REFER ME THE CASE LAW CITED BY THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT BENCH AT NAGPUR ON THE VALIDITY OF CASTE ( THE OFFENCE CAN NOT BE REGISTER BY THE CASTE VALIDITY AUTHORITY AGAINST THE PERSON IF IN CASE HE HAS CLAIM THE SAME CASTE AS DISPUTED)
PLEASE CITE ME THE SAME AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE I WL THANKFUL 2 U
Member (Account Deleted)
03 December 2010 at 21:02
How writ petition (civil) and writ petition (criminal)differ under article 32 ?
Anonymous
30 November 2010 at 22:51
High Court directed to consider the representation within five months .But not considered .Can I file Contempt petition.
sibashis mondal
29 November 2010 at 00:59
I have joined Airports Authority of India, a Govt-PSU in the year 1998 as Manager (GR-A Post). After that, till today I have not given any SC/ST facility to get promotion. The SC/ST facility was given for Manager to Sr.Manager post till the year 2004 in which one my batch mate(SC) was benefitted but I was left out due to non availability of SC posts. From the year 2005 AAI management stopped this facility and I was promoted to Senior Manager with general candidates. Can I go to court? AAI is not a scientific research organisation.
Anonymous
27 November 2010 at 21:41
Respected sirs,
A man using spectacle has left it after
refraction corrective Lasik/Laser surgery.
Does it call seperate identity because of
becoming without spect?now can he place his
old personal documents with spect eg. voter
card,Hsc admit card etc.for official purposes
or he should correct it from respective
places as without glass for the same?
Regards
Member (Account Deleted)
27 November 2010 at 16:24
What is a letter petition before supreme court ?
S Viswanatha Rao
27 November 2010 at 08:16
The Provisions of Section 22 of RTI Act 2005 (Central Act No 22 of) has over riding effect visa-vis other laws in force Kindly enumerate whether the Indian Constitutional Articles/Provisions have over-riding effect to that of provisions of RTI due to the fact that section 21 of Act no suit lies Also indicate whether an RTI applicant can remit application fee through Money Order/E-Money order and so any notifications/orders issued by the nodal ministry
Thanks and good day
S Viswanatha Rai
ami
25 November 2010 at 22:28
respected Experts,
will any one state any judgements in support of "unequals cannot be treated as equals in promotion or amending recruitment rules for promotion"-AMI
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
committee of dispute
We are a central PSU. we had filed a consumer case in consumer forum against a PSU insurance company after taking clearance from the Committee of Dispute as per the OM No. 53/1/10/94-Cab dated 24.1.1994. We lost the case in all the three fora i.e, District, State and also in National Forum. Now we want to file Appeal?SLP in the Apex Court. Should we required to again apply for clearance from the COD. The OM referred above is silent . Kindly advise alongwit citing the OM or case law, if any.