Renu Renu MM
05 November 2011 at 17:03
Dear Sir,
In todays world in order to get justice is a dream come true. One of my friend who is a real ST has cleared her KPSC Examination in Karnataka but a non ST who falsely claims to be a Scheduled Tribe has snatched her bread by being selected as a DySP. Now that my friend has cum to know about her caste as KANIYAR which is belongs to Category 2A as per Art 16 in the list of Backward class. She claims to be a KANIYAN which is a Scheduled Tribe restricted to Kollegal talukand in rest of Karnataka this caste is a Packward caste. Now the fake candidate being a Kaniyar ie, a backward caste through out Karnataka has claimed to be a KANIyN, a ST restricting to Kollegal taluk is claiming for the job.
Now she came to know that most of the KANIYARS who are OPC's are falsely claiming to be KANIYAN of Kollegal taluk though they belong to other districts of Karnataka. The whole community is playing a foul and fraud and enjoying the benifits of ST that is given by the Govt.
In this case the complaint against the accused is being lodged by the brother in law of the accused now the main case is being treated as the family conflict and is being looked as disput and thus the accused has been sheided.
I want to know as to how to approach the court or other authories in this regard and get justice and i have also heard that any one who comes to know about the fake ST certificate can give a complaint to the concerned authorities.
PARTHA SARKAR
05 November 2011 at 08:50
Kindly advise me on the following situation:
1. PIO informed at the hearing that records is not traceable hence providing actual information sought for not possible.
2. State Information Commission hard both side at the hearing and directed the PIO to search record vigorously and supply the information sought for to the petitioner within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order.
3. After expiry of the 30 days a petition has been submitted at the Commission followed by a fresh RTI petition at the Commission.
4. Comes to know from the reliable source that the said PIO sent an e-mail directly to the Commission mentioned record not traceable without supplying any information to the petitioner.
5. Even after repeated follow up State Commission still keeping themselves silent and not providing any information or taking any action against the said defaulter PIO (took more than six month time to respond) nor impose any penalty.
A. Under these circumstances is it advisable to write to the Governor stating the entire facts – complaint against State Information Commissioner for violation of the Act?
Regards
Partha Sarkar
Adv.Aiyer VLV
03 November 2011 at 12:40
A complaint on CA stating he was engaged as client is filed by individual. verified as individual. complaint is about grievance of a society I. society claims name as I-India. 1991 accounts claimed as branch account audied by CA & audit report do not have words Branch of I or IIndia I or I-India. no proof for I-India as name. no resolution, letter of engagement with complainant, I or I-India filed. CA refused they had ever been client, but report issued to another society IB. IB sent reports on its own to I-India AOP for assessment. no written document for oral AOP. Institute in crypticfinds prima facie guilty orders disciplinary committee enquiry. CA filed evidence of another CA who refused he signed 1st balance sheet claimed by I and deposed it was given to IB. DC lies about interlocuory application filed asking for documentary evidence from complainant and evidence filed by CA. first and only 1 day hearing,case closed.
700 page documents filed on that day by I including IT orders. no time given to reply to it. minutes prove DC did not read 700 pages.
DC made 4 findings.
finding 1 false as per record of institute.
finding 2 regarding name use covered by Reg190 covered as professional misconduct under clause(i)Part II 2 sch, but holds guilty of other misconduct.
finding 3 states even if 2 balance sheet signed for IB is misconduct whereas institute issued guidance note for revision of account & audit report, when case filed was 1 balance sheet given to I, modified and issued to IB. finding 3 proves I lost case and no balance sheet exist of I for 1991.
finding 4 states 1988 to 2000, I balance sheet and IB balance sheet seems from same books of account. this finding is borrowed from IT order to which CA is not party.
none of balance sheet filed by I, has 'branch' or 'I' or 'I-India' name.
Civil court (in suit b/w I &IB) finds I could not prove branch existed. DC ignores finding of binding civil court.
DC report leaked to complainant, Reg16(2) provides only CA to be given report.
complainant issues defamatory media release maligning CA, with lies not part of report.
What are remedies to CA writ to quash/re-enquiry, defamation suit, injunciton etc.? whether writ remedy for denovo enquiry & quashing proceeding u/A 226, 227 available to CA? fundamental rights violation occurred u/A 14, 19, 20 & 21?
Anonymous
03 November 2011 at 06:22
Esteemed Members,
2 Christians they got married in India and their marriage got solemnized according to Indian Christian Marriage Act. After few years they applied for divorce and they got the sane. now the question is Custody of Minor Child (aged 3 years). Is provisions of the Guardian and Wards Act a violation of Article 14 of Indian Constitution?
Thanks in advance
MG N RAO
02 November 2011 at 13:53
can a permanent appointment of a employee on probation be terminated without an opportunity being given based on the clause in the offer of appointment that an employee can be terminated without assigning any reason at anytime without giving notice.
is it fair if so what will happen to such an employee who has resigned his previous employment what will happen to his past serivices of 12 yrs based on which the present selection is made
Member (Account Deleted)
30 October 2011 at 11:13
s the National Advisory Council[NAC] above the Prime Minister? If not what are its powers vis a vis those of the Prime Minister and the Parliament ? If yes then is it obligatory for the Parliament or the Prime Minister to obey the directions of the NAC? Since all bills/directions submitted by the NAC[ nac.nic.in] are obeyed by the Parliament and all bills etc. submitted in the Parliament are first ratified by the NAC,is this NAC above the Parliament? As the Congress President is also the Chair person of the NAC can the said Chairperson be considered the Supreme Ruler of India as a Constitutional or an extra Constitutional Authority? Since the Chairperson comes within the jurisdiction of the Rome Statue having an Italian Citizenship [Italy submitted itself to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court],can the said Italian Ruler be Prosecuted in the International Criminal Court in any violation of the Rome Statute?
Note: ONLY SERIOUS ANSWERS PLEASE BY THOSE HAVING THE GUTS.
Anonymous
28 October 2011 at 08:32
hi... sir.. i need your help..please help me ... can you give me answer.. sir my friend born in rajasthan state but he completed his school and college study in gujarat and now he has gujarat domicile certificate he married with rajasthan girl. so can his wife apply gujarat state goverment jobs including panchayat ..jobs..
Anonymous
22 October 2011 at 17:00
How to understand that which judgment is a landmark judgment & the other is only a judgment.
meaning of landmark judgment.
and difference between judgment & landmark judgment.
Thanks
Anonymous
22 October 2011 at 16:54
Artilce 15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.-
(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.
(3) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.
Question: Artilce 15(1) say that there should be no discrimintaion between sex etc. & in contary the sub rule 3 say that if the sate goverment can make the provision for women & children also it say that nothing in this artilce means artilce 15 will attract sub rule 3 can't we say that artilce 15(3) makes the discrmintation between sex.
so which will prevail artilce 15(1) or 15(3).
any case to understand it more properly in depth.
What does biological father & mother means.
thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sixth pay arrerrs to temporary/adhoc employs
Sir,
I was On Temporary appointment on Lecturers post from 2006 to 2008. Appointment orders with days Technical breaks.Now I am working on same post as permanent employ and receiving salary by 6th pay. But state govt of maharashtra had denied me the arrears of 6th pay within 2006-2008. Kindly guide me with supporting Laws & rules to file case in MAT.