Member (Account Deleted)
13 November 2011 at 21:31
Can I file a PIL against a department of govt of India to cause bleeding of the exchequers directly to the Chief Justice of India online?
Anonymous
13 November 2011 at 19:17
can anyone say what is appointment made in public interest in case of a fresh appointment made against a open advt of a candidate already in govt service does it gaurantee any constitutional rights if terminated while on probation what will happen to his past services in case terminated on probation
BALAJI
12 November 2011 at 13:39
are windmills covered under section 160 of tamilnadu panchayat act. Can a panchayat ask demoloition of windmill or levy tax on windmill as according to section 160 of tamilnadu panchayat act. Is there any ruling / or judgements which says that windmills are not covered under the panchayat act
Anonymous
11 November 2011 at 17:03
i would like to know there is any punishment who performing black magic(jadu)on somebody and this magic have power to die someone. the victim is alone eye witness of its immoral activity, so there is any legal action or rules in this regard in our constitution,and how person protect himself from this situation pls give favorable recommendation
SURESH GODBOLE
08 November 2011 at 18:52
Dear Experts ,
Its painful to say thet today it is being given to understand that shamelessly the Central Govt is offering some kind of package to the Bengal Govt in bargain of not Rolling Back the increase in Petrol Prices.
Pl comment :-
(i) The Oil Cos are PSUs , the extra money collected goes to Govt of India
(ii) It is being collected from every nook and corner of India
(iii) How that can be bargained for a package (EXTRA) to Bengal Govt when its to be distributed to whole of India
(iv) Can anyone move Honble the Supereme Court thro a PIL to put an embargo on such a bargain henceforth
(v) As a CITIZEN OF INDIA and living in RAJASTHAN , MY STATE HAS A RIGHT FOR WHATEVER COLLECTION IS BEING MADE FROM RAJASTHAN
HOW the collection made from RAJASTHAN BE DIVERTED TO BENGAL AS RAJASTHAN IS ALSO AS POOR AS BENGAL IS .
CAN WE FILE A PIL IN SUPEREME COURT to STAY THE DISBURSEMENT OF PACKAGE TILL IT IS DECIDED BY HONBLE SUPREME COURT
With regards ,
Pl comment
Dr Prashant Patil
07 November 2011 at 08:08
Sir,
I was On Temporary appointment on Lecturers post from 2006 to 2008. Appointment orders with days Technical breaks.Now I am working on same post as permanent employ and receiving salary by 6th pay. But state govt of maharashtra had denied me the arrears of 6th pay within 2006-2008. Kindly guide me with supporting Laws & rules to file case in MAT.
Renu Renu MM
05 November 2011 at 17:03
Dear Sir,
In todays world in order to get justice is a dream come true. One of my friend who is a real ST has cleared her KPSC Examination in Karnataka but a non ST who falsely claims to be a Scheduled Tribe has snatched her bread by being selected as a DySP. Now that my friend has cum to know about her caste as KANIYAR which is belongs to Category 2A as per Art 16 in the list of Backward class. She claims to be a KANIYAN which is a Scheduled Tribe restricted to Kollegal talukand in rest of Karnataka this caste is a Packward caste. Now the fake candidate being a Kaniyar ie, a backward caste through out Karnataka has claimed to be a KANIyN, a ST restricting to Kollegal taluk is claiming for the job.
Now she came to know that most of the KANIYARS who are OPC's are falsely claiming to be KANIYAN of Kollegal taluk though they belong to other districts of Karnataka. The whole community is playing a foul and fraud and enjoying the benifits of ST that is given by the Govt.
In this case the complaint against the accused is being lodged by the brother in law of the accused now the main case is being treated as the family conflict and is being looked as disput and thus the accused has been sheided.
I want to know as to how to approach the court or other authories in this regard and get justice and i have also heard that any one who comes to know about the fake ST certificate can give a complaint to the concerned authorities.
PARTHA SARKAR
05 November 2011 at 08:50
Kindly advise me on the following situation:
1. PIO informed at the hearing that records is not traceable hence providing actual information sought for not possible.
2. State Information Commission hard both side at the hearing and directed the PIO to search record vigorously and supply the information sought for to the petitioner within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order.
3. After expiry of the 30 days a petition has been submitted at the Commission followed by a fresh RTI petition at the Commission.
4. Comes to know from the reliable source that the said PIO sent an e-mail directly to the Commission mentioned record not traceable without supplying any information to the petitioner.
5. Even after repeated follow up State Commission still keeping themselves silent and not providing any information or taking any action against the said defaulter PIO (took more than six month time to respond) nor impose any penalty.
A. Under these circumstances is it advisable to write to the Governor stating the entire facts – complaint against State Information Commissioner for violation of the Act?
Regards
Partha Sarkar
Adv.Aiyer VLV
03 November 2011 at 12:40
A complaint on CA stating he was engaged as client is filed by individual. verified as individual. complaint is about grievance of a society I. society claims name as I-India. 1991 accounts claimed as branch account audied by CA & audit report do not have words Branch of I or IIndia I or I-India. no proof for I-India as name. no resolution, letter of engagement with complainant, I or I-India filed. CA refused they had ever been client, but report issued to another society IB. IB sent reports on its own to I-India AOP for assessment. no written document for oral AOP. Institute in crypticfinds prima facie guilty orders disciplinary committee enquiry. CA filed evidence of another CA who refused he signed 1st balance sheet claimed by I and deposed it was given to IB. DC lies about interlocuory application filed asking for documentary evidence from complainant and evidence filed by CA. first and only 1 day hearing,case closed.
700 page documents filed on that day by I including IT orders. no time given to reply to it. minutes prove DC did not read 700 pages.
DC made 4 findings.
finding 1 false as per record of institute.
finding 2 regarding name use covered by Reg190 covered as professional misconduct under clause(i)Part II 2 sch, but holds guilty of other misconduct.
finding 3 states even if 2 balance sheet signed for IB is misconduct whereas institute issued guidance note for revision of account & audit report, when case filed was 1 balance sheet given to I, modified and issued to IB. finding 3 proves I lost case and no balance sheet exist of I for 1991.
finding 4 states 1988 to 2000, I balance sheet and IB balance sheet seems from same books of account. this finding is borrowed from IT order to which CA is not party.
none of balance sheet filed by I, has 'branch' or 'I' or 'I-India' name.
Civil court (in suit b/w I &IB) finds I could not prove branch existed. DC ignores finding of binding civil court.
DC report leaked to complainant, Reg16(2) provides only CA to be given report.
complainant issues defamatory media release maligning CA, with lies not part of report.
What are remedies to CA writ to quash/re-enquiry, defamation suit, injunciton etc.? whether writ remedy for denovo enquiry & quashing proceeding u/A 226, 227 available to CA? fundamental rights violation occurred u/A 14, 19, 20 & 21?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Eligibility to compete in inter-university competition
I am the first prize winner of an event in inter-college fest. I expressed my interest to participate in the inter-university fest before the concerned authority and the same was agreed. but a first year student who has not participated in the said fest was selected without my knowledge and consent.
1. CAN I SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGE THIS SELECTION?
2. HOW SHOULD I PROCEED WITH THE MATTER?
NB: I have won first in the INTER-COLLEGE ARTS FEST this year.
The 1st year student they have selected is a winner of the said event for the past three years in the INTER-SCHOOL ARTS FEST.
The dispute is regarding participation of the winning event in an INTER-UNIVERSITY ARTS FEST