Im Plaintiff in civil suit I want to know defendant file affidavit in english language and as per my request filed Marathi language affidavit but verious changes made in both affidavit so how can I pray to court to take action for change of drafting and what legal action court has to be taken
Pls guide
Dear Experts,
My wife has four siblings sister, my father in law passed away in 2024. She has no brother. My mother in law is house wife. My father in law has purchased a house in 2000 and got registered on the name of mother in law. Me and my wife are looking after my mother in law after the death of my father in law. we want equally 5 share of property for all the sisters of my wife. My Mother in law want to gift property only to younger sister of my wife. though, this property is not the self earned property of my mother in law. My query is that , do we have any legal rights to stop my mother in law for gifting the house to younger sister of my wife.
Regards,
Srikant
My previous quary was not yet resolve
In 2010, A power of attorney (no consideration involved) for share in property in rajasthan was fraudulently from a female senior citizen staying in gujarat.
Using that power of attorney a release deed (relinquishment) was made without the knowledge of the lady.
The senior lady has just in 2025 learnt about such release deed in favour of one person, and now that person is entering into agreement for sale with someone.
How the lady should proceed to stop the sale of her share in the property grabbed under power of attorney made by fraud? Criminal case, civil case, order to registering authority to not to register any deed of sale, order to not to update mutation records , .... What should be the strategy to get justice?
Lawyers may also contact over direct message for taking up the case professionally.
Want detail clarification with some example of proviso of rule22of order21 of cpc
Sir
I would like to clarify some doubts regarding Cancellation of Sale Deed which has been Registered based on Forgery POA.
i.e. My Friend's Father namely Sudalai bought some properties through his self earning in 1985 and out of which some properties have been sold by a Land Broker by forgery POA executed by him - (Chidambaram)
Chidambaram(Land Broker) prepared 2 forgery POA in favour of him, like it has been executed by Sudalai in 1996 ( out of the two one prepared with Sudalai Sign ( Chidambaram has referred Sudalai sign from his previous deed and put like that) another one with some one LTI)
Thereafter Chidambaram sold the property in 1996 to some others, based on that forgery POA.
Now Sudalai also no more and leaving behind him 2 sons and 4 daughters and his legal heirs want to cancel the sale deed.Hence you are requested to kindly guide.
I have actual Signature and LTI of Sudalai (Since he has bought some property & sold a property in 1987 with his original sign and LTI )
So I have an option to compare the sign & LTI available in proper document & forgery document .
By the mean time ,I hope that civil court only have the jurisdiction to do so .
Hence you are requested to kindly guide me whether should I file case to cancel the sale deed or POA ?
If I cancel the POA or prove the POA is invalid one, then automatically the subsequent document what has been executed based on POA will become null & Void? or Should I file separate case to cancel the sale deed?
Whether any one of the legal heirs can file the case or all should sign in the petition ?
As per the Notary Act or rules in India, it is mandatory for a Notary to keep the records of notarized documents and registers etc. of the last how many years safe?
Thank you.
I was making a U-turn in my car on the road when an electric scooter without a number plate suddenly braked and slipped. The rider, a 45-year-old man, and his 12-year-old son fell and came under my car. I immediately applied the brakes. The scooter was completely damaged, and the man suffered a leg fracture, while his son sustained minor scratches. However, the scooter did not collide with my car, and there was no damage or scratch on my vehicle.
I took them to AIIMS hospital in an emergency and informed their family. Two days after the accident, I submitted an application at the police station, but they did not provide a receipt. The injured man sought compensation through a third-party insurance claim. After 20 days, the police registered an FIR against me under Sections 281 and 125(a). I then went to the police station, obtained bail, and my car was seized. Later, I secured the release of my car through the court.
I later learned that the same person had a similar accident with a Bolero car a month before my incident, during which he also sustained leg fractures and other injuries. That time also he file FIR against bolero driver. However, in the FIR filed against me, he falsely claimed fractures in his legs and five broken ribs. It appears that he is trying to take advantage of the situation to obtain a disability certificate for benefits, such as a discount on a home loan, and to claim compensation through third-party insurance.
I am worried because I only helped him by taking him to the hospital and calling his family, but now my goodwill has turned against me. Since I am a government employee, frequent court hearings will be difficult for me to attend, especially if I get transferred. I have already spent ₹10,000 on legal expenses, and he is demanding an unethical amount of ₹4–5 lakh for settlement.
He is unwilling to compromise, and I am unsure about the legal consequences. Will I receive any punishment? Will my insurance company’s lawyer handle the case? Should I file a counter-FIR against him for demanding extra money? Please suggest the best course of action in this legal matter.
(1) certified copy of deposition recorded by sub Divisional Magistrate under section 145 cr p c is not admissible in civil suit .
(2) certified copy of marked exhibited document in 145 Code of Criminal Procedure is not admissible in civil suit
Inspection of documents
Dear experts,
I have filed a commercial suit before city civil court based on the supply of the goods. The defendants had ordered for the goods via phone calls and for a few transactions they sent a PO. During the hearing of summary judgment the defendant has produced their ledger wherein they showed the entries of 19 invoices out of 20 invoices. based on the same a conditional leave to defend was granted.
Now the defendant is asking me for the inspections of original PO and all Invoices towards denial of my claim. What should I do?
Thanks in Advance.