Ankit tiwari
27 July 2015 at 13:17
to all the respected & learned lawyers,
i wish to know that is there any such judgement/circular which entails that a stay granted by hon'ble high court, even if time-bound, shall be in force if no unfavourable order has been passed thereafter or untill the court has specifically vacated the same?
pls. help me!
S. Fernandes
26 July 2015 at 21:43
Is compliance of rule 8, under sarfaesi act mandatory
Anita
26 July 2015 at 19:30
First hearing date : 07-02-2015
Decision Date 07-02-2015
Case Status CASE DISPOSED
Nature Of Disposal : Uncontested--OTHER
My mother in law is been going on putting civil cases against my husband . We already have a civil case going on for one of the property . When I checked into district e site it's showing me other case for which I never received any papers or summons .
Earlier for this it used to show case dismissed but now the the case status is case disposed uncontested others
What does this mean . Is an order passed in her favor . What step should I take now .
Please I am really stressed some help will be really appreciated
pradeep
26 July 2015 at 18:36
I am serving as Junior Engineer (Civil) in border security force. I was joined in BSF during Jan 1996 and served in Communication Branch upto Apr 2005. While in Communication Branch of BSF in the rank of HC, being a Civil Engineering diploma holder , I have been selected for deputation to the rank of SI in Engineering Branch (Civil ) of same department during May 2005 which was one rank higher than I holding in my parent cadre . As per my deputation order, the deputation was year to year basis and further after completion of my 3 year 4 months deputation period I have absorbed to Engineering Branch as SI . During the period of my deputation , 18 personnel has been enrolled by direct recruitment against vacancies without absorbing me when sufficient vacancies were existing and as per RR filling of vacancies will be at 60:40 ratio (Direct rectt: deputation/absorption) .Department said I was to complete 3 years in deputation for further absorption but previously in similar cases the person who were in deputation in Engineering (Ele) section were absorbed in 14 months,16months,24 months etc. Now , all the 18 pers who were recruited after I appointed as SI on deputation are my seniors as per existing CSR when they have less experience in Engineering cadre as well as in BSF. Moreover, some of them are trained under me.
My complaint against our department (BSF) is that, they did not absorbed me after my minimum required period of deputation as applied to others when there were sufficient vacancies which made Junior to many persons who are still having less experience.
I know the rule (7) of Seniority in CSR that, normally the Seniority will be considered from the date of absorption, but my question is if I am not repatriated to my cadre and am performed duties satisfactorily as same as my seniors who are in the same cadre and I ever 100 % responsible for all the work I have done during my deputation period , what is the logic I am not giving Seniority than the people who are joined after I joined in the same cadre on deputation.
Considering Seniority rule also, if I absorbed by the department after completion of one year deputation instead of 3 yrs 4 months , I may get Seniority above the personnel joined after that time.
Please suggest any way out to get Seniority from the date of my deputation .
smita
26 July 2015 at 17:56
Hi,
My husband passed away a year ago leaving an unregistered will in my name with witness signatures where he specifically mentioned all the immovamoble properties.
I want to mention we stay in bangalore and we have a registered flat in bangalore and another yet to be registered flat in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. Both the flats we both are joint owners in documents and also in loans.
Now the builder of bhubaneswar flat is asking more supporting documents like succession certificate to make the property transfer documents in my name for the purpose of registration.
Please guide what actually should be done and where it should be done(where the deceased was staying during death or the location of property)
Jameer
26 July 2015 at 08:47
Hello sir
i discontinued my Btech graduate from a college and requested the principal to submit my ssc and 10+2 certificates but the person asking to pay the total course fees
can i proceed legally?
thank you
Jameer
26 July 2015 at 08:44
Hello sir
i am working in a Government psu and i am in probation period,is there any chance for the employer to remove me from duties during probation.
please reply
thank you.
Presently iam not facing any problem but in the coming near future if the employer wants to remove me from the job as i am in probation because the company is in loss,on which grounds can he remove me from my job>
Thank you
surjit singh
26 July 2015 at 07:25
In an earlier partation suit which was dismissed on 1998 for non prosecution the karta of the family was not made as a separate party in new partition suit we are making the karta as a party as HUF as well as kindividually. In the earlier suit there were some agricultural plot which were left out and some were wrongly mentioned because all the documents at that time was with karta.
Now in the new partition suit we are making the karta as a seperate party as HUF as well as individually. Since 1988 we are having seperate kitchen. Most of the land documents are still with karta i.e. eldest brother of my father, but we are now able to procure the correct plot numbers.
My query is (1) whether making karta of that time as party in new suit will affect the new partition suit?
(2) Since there will be difference in plots number in the schedule as compare to the earlier suit. Will it affect the suit.
surjit singh
26 July 2015 at 07:22
In an earlier partation suit which was dismissed on 1998 for non prosecution the karta of the family was not made as a separate pkitow in new partition suit we are making the karta as a party as HUF as well as individually. In the earlier suit there were some agricultural plot which were left out and some were wrongly mentioned because all the documents at that time was with karta.
Now in the new partition suit we are making the karta as a seperate party as HUF as well as individually. Since 1988 we are having seperate kitchen. Most of the land documents are still with karta i.e. eldest brother of my father, but we are now able to procure the correct plot numbers.
My query is (1) whether making karta of that time as party in new suit will affect the new partition suit?
(2) Since there will be difference in plots number in the schedule as compare to the earlier suit. Will it affect the suit.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Quashing false declaration suit in high court
My grand father is having 3 acres 13 guntas land. out of which, 10 guntas land was acquired by government to construct road. My grand father's aunt filed civil case against government in bangalore civil court, as her land measuring 2 acres 04 guntas was also acquired for road purpose. During evidence in Bangalore civil court she said entire 3 acres 13 guntas land is my grand father's share, which is true. and order was also passed in my grand father's favour. and compensation for 10 guntas land was awarded. Now recently the same lady has filed Declaration and injunction suit in another civil court saying she is the owner of the land for 3 acres 13 guntas land which belongs to my grand father and has no record in her name, she has suppressed her statement which was given in bangalore civil court. Our counsel submitted rejection of plaint under order 7, rule 11 of CPC. But Judge did not allow it. Now my question is can we go for quashing of this declaration and injunction suit in high court based on her statement and her children's statement in bangalore civil court, in which they have clearly said 3 acres 13 guntas land belong to my grand father. Which is mentioned in the order copy too ?