Rajeev
26 August 2015 at 12:58
if someone has sold more land like 12 beega (in record mutation done) while he has only 10 beega in his title(ror).
dear sir, what action can be taken in this regard.
Dear Sir,
I passed B.tech from CMJUNIVERSITY, Meghalya in the year 2012, Governor of the state suddenly lodged FIR against University chancellor/owner in the year 2013 stating that recall all degree, the case going to supreme court & SC ordered to govt that you please chose the option ie either dissolve the univ or anything also stating please think about pas sout student by given chances of hearing & govt took hearing & invalidate all degree by sending individual letter. The university till now ugc list. At current year university challenge govt dissolution order & university own the case. The High court meghalya cancelled the govt dissolution order.
my Question is- "IS MY DEGREE NOW VALID"
2nd Question Is- I passed B.Tech from that university is it valid for govt job?
indianyooth
26 August 2015 at 12:21
sir
i am a poor man , the in laws of my sister was murdered, my sister , but the police was not arrested to killer after 10 days of dead, we have to fight for juctice , we have block the national highway, sir we are not a reguler criminal , sir we want juctice for my late sister, but police file a case agaist us for this, pls sir help us pls guide us
Manzoor Ahmad
26 August 2015 at 11:53
Sir,
I am Manzoor from Jammu Kashmir.
My Query is
1./ In December 2011 I write a simple application on Plain Paper to the management of School for the for giving them a Canteen of School on rent for a 1 year.
2./ The management of the school approved my application and on the same application they approved the sanction of canteen and its yearly rent with a proper signature.
3/After some time I renovate the canteen and installed necessary infrastructures that includes installing of shutters,glasses and electric fittings.
4/That after running canteen for 3 months the management locked my canteen on the allegation that you are selling expired and sub standard items.
5./ For this I filed a civil suit in the case claiming the loss which happened due to locking of canteen and future loss.
6/ That during the trial I presented bills of items who were lost due to locking of canteen.
7/ That during the trial which runs for almost three years in the court I (Plaintiff) was present in 60 hearings out of 60 hearings and the defendants were present for only 8 hearings out of same 60 hearings.
8./That during trial I also presented my witnesses who were cross examined by the defendants.
9/ That after cross examination of my witnesses ,the defendants were asked to present witnesses.But they failed to produce witnesses.
10/For near about seven (07) months court waited for the witnesses but no one was produced from the side of defendants.
11/After that Hon'ble Judge of the trial court put them in the X-Party category and asked Plaintiffs for argument.
12/ At the time of argument the advocate of defendants was not available also and Plaintiffs advocate argues for 15-20 minutes regarding the case.
Now what is in your opinion on the basis of material evidence,witnesses from Plaintiffs side and their cross examination, Witness testimony from Plaintiff side and the plaintiffs presence on every court hearing the judgement goes on which side(Plaintiff Side or Defendant Side) and what will be the nature of the judgements.Hope that you will reply.
Malvika
26 August 2015 at 11:36
Learned experts,
A wants to sue his collegue B, but does not have B's residential address.
In the above scenario can B's office address be given for the court summons to be served after A files a Plaint?
Dear Sir,
One of my client buying a commercial vehicle by taking loan from finance company, on some instalment default the finance company repossessed the vehicle on the strength of agreement( Clause-5) and auctioned the vehicle and when their loan amount not recovered they again demanding money on the strength of said agreement and initiated case in Sole Arbitrator,vide (Clause-15) Arbitration in agreement. Now the question is that, can finance company do that ?
Aftabul Hussain
Advocate
Gauhati High Court.
Rastogi
25 August 2015 at 21:03
My client executed a usufructuary mortgage for one acre for a period of 3 years for INR 10000 and delivered the possession to mortgagee
After 2 years, my client executed one more mortgage deed for 2 acre including the first one mentioned above for INR 20000 with a condition that he should redeem the first mortgage and take the delivery.
will second mortgage will be still considered as usufructuary mortgage since there was no delivery of possession to the extent of one acre at the time of creation of second mortgage deed.
rahul
25 August 2015 at 17:31
Respected Members,
There are six defendants in suit & summons has been served to all the defendants four month back & court has accepted the service.
The defendant no. 1 & 2 appeared on the first date fixed for hearing & only Defendant no. 1 file written statement & matter adjourned for reply after two months.
On the second date i.e. after two month Hon. Judge was on leave & matter adjourned to next month.
On the next date Defendant no.1, 2 & 3 appeared & Defendant no. 3 asked for time to file written statement & hence matter adjourned for filling reply by defendant no.3 to next month.
Till this Defendant no. 2 has only appeared & in spite of receiving summons four months back he has not file reply & he has not asked for any time to file the same. He is only appearing.
I am certain that on the next date I will file application to the court to pass ex-parte order against Defendant no.4 to 6 as per order 9 rule 6. I have no confusion in respect of Defendant no.4 to 6.
But I am confused about the Defendant no.2 about whether can I pray to court to pass ex-parte order against defendant no. 2 ? because he has appeared but has not file WS & he is silent on it.
Therefore I am planning that if on the next date if defendant no.2appeared & do not file WS then I will Pray to the court that no written statement order may be passed against Defendant no.2 as time given by order 8 rule 1 to file WS has lapsed & even if Defendant 2 ask for time to file WS then cost must be imposed on him.
1. Please guide whether I am right or wrong ?
2. What would be proper steps for me in such circumstances ?
Thanking you.
Demise of guaranteer
A person breeks loan from bank & has nothing to pledge except personal guarantee. After his demise he has nothing to clear the loan as he has no assets. The children have not inherited anything but the court insists you have to clear the loan. Is it justifiable & if so how to defend this order. Please help