Suresh Babu Rai
18 February 2016 at 09:55
Good Morning Sir! Its Res Judicata!!
I have filed a civil suit for perpetual injunction against the sole defendant before the Junior Judge's Court in the year 2010.
The said court pleased to grant ex parte injunction on the day of institution of the plaint along with its application U/O.39, R.1 & 2 of CPC against the sole defendant restraining from interfere in to suit land.
The sole defendant filed her counter affidavit, but did not choose to advance her arguments in the above application U/O. 39, R.1 & 2 of CPC, hence the ex parte orders are still in force and the said application is still pending for enquiry.
As natter stood thus, the sole defendant before the Junior Judge's Court has filed another suit for perpetual injunction against us in the Senior Civil judge's court on 16.01.2016 basing on some false documents and by suppressing the earlier suit pending with the junior civil judge's court. The COurt without pleased to grant ex parte injunction orders against us in the application U/O.39, R.1 and 2 of CPC.
I have filed the copies of earlier suit in the former suit, where the Senior Civil Judge's Court pleased to grant ex parte injunction against us. I have clearly and categorically submitted my counter and the Court pleased to dismiss the application filed U/O. 39, R. 1 & 2 of CPC and vacated the ex parte injunction in our favour
Now the point is! whether the former suit filed by the sole defendant in my earlier suit on the file of Senior Civil Judge's Court by suppressing the materiel facts is hit by Sec.11 of CPC i.e principles of res-judicata or not? What will be next step?
Thanks one and all! Have a great day!!
E
18 February 2016 at 09:40
HI
I am going to lease my building to a bank for 15 years after after due tendering. But there is concern in the market that even banks donot vacate the property on expiry of lease or before, if reqd and the matter goes in to litigation. Some people are also of the view that there is a affidavit which is to be signed by the LESSEE bank at the time of execution of LEASE DEED which binds BANKS TO vacate premises on expiration of deemed lease deed.
Can any one advise me the text or matter of such affidavit ..
What increase do nationalized banks give after 5 years?
Can one put its terms in the lease deed to been executed. Bank officials say they have a standardized lease and nothing can be changed to it.
What remedy/ reply to can i give to bank on the above;
E
18 February 2016 at 09:34
HI
I am going to lease my building to a bank for 15 years after after due tendering. But there is concern in the market that even banks donot vacate the property on expiry of lease or before, if reqd and the matter goes in to litigation. Some people are also of the view that there is a affidavit which is to be signed by the LESSEE bank at the time of execution of LEASE DEED which binds BANKS TO vacate premises on expiration of deemed lease deed.
Can any one advise me the text or matter of such affidavit
Member (Account Deleted)
18 February 2016 at 08:50
Sir,
Kindly enhance my knowledge.
1.Can petitioner, make complaint against lawyer?.
2.How much maximum time, lawyer take to fill writ petition?.
3. The group of employee say four posted to different states want to fill writ petition against their own organisation (PSU) situated at New Delhi.Can the writ petition fill at Delhi?
With regards
Dr Shahid Nadeem
18 February 2016 at 00:46
Respected experts.....
In 2009 year we have taken an election of a public trust by finalising newly inducted members as directed by the Charity Commissioner and put a change report .....during pendency of that change report with Assistant Charity commissioner , No member from rival group has objected the election process and induction of members , that means neither any written objection filled on that change report nor any objections raised regarding those newly inducted members up to the tenure of that change report expired i.e up to 5 years.... That means change report of 2009 remain uncontested ........
Due to term over we proceeded with new election and again put a change report in 2015 which is also pending with Assistant charity commissioner ..but on change report of 2015 rival group of members has taken objections on election process and presence of those new members who had participated in 2009 and same members shown in 2015 election..is that objection tenable or not ?????
KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI
17 February 2016 at 22:37
One of Tennant has defaulted in paying rent for more then 12 months in west bengal kolkata.Can he be ejected ? Wil he still have the chance to deposit rent in court?
ATUL ACHYUT GOKHALE
17 February 2016 at 18:54
We are unknown about compromise decree of partition in Mumbai Highcourt in the year 1964. In some part execution of decree is not happened. Can we do partition of land according to decree after 50 years.
B CHAKRABORTY
17 February 2016 at 15:41
Sir,
We filed a petition U/s 13B of H M Act 1955 in June'2015 at Barracpore Court North 24 Parganas (W.B.) and after final hearing in Jan'2016 I was informed that The Order was passed.
My question :
1. I have tried a no. of times to see my case status from Barrackpore Court web site but every time when I put my case no. .....the reply is record not found. I have also tried by putting party name but result is same. Are the all cases not uploaded in web site ?
2. Can I myself issue a Certified Copy from the the concerned department of the Court directly. If so please suggest the procedures.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ceiling of land holding by a company incorporated in andhra pradesh
Hi sir/Madam,
I had a query relating to ceiling of land holding by a company in Andhra Pradesh.
What is the maximum amount of agricultural and non agricultural land a company incorporated in Andhra Pradesh can hold.
Can you provide me the details cumulatively and individually.
Will the ceiling changes if the nature of companies changes.(i.e., agricultural company, trading company etc.)
Thank you in advance Sir/Madam.