Mohit
16 November 2010 at 11:02
I would like to know cases and judgements on the topic "waiver of steps before arbitration". if the authority which is authorise in agreement that in case of dispute that one settle the dispute before arbitration, is not functioning properly than either part may directly go for arbitration
ess
16 November 2010 at 07:09
If some case is adjourned sine die because of non appearance of petitioner, and the petitioner gives his reply after sometime, how will tbe respondent come to know of that ?
Will the petitioner have to serve compies of his reply to the respondent and his counsel ?
Is any procedure prescribed for starting an adjourned sine die case ?
Bhaskar
16 November 2010 at 02:08
Hi All,
Please suggest me how to proceed on my below issue.
I have taken Rs.3 Lakhs Chit from a Chit fund company, and I made payments of all installments regularly, however i was not able to pay last two instalments(20,000+ aprox) due to some commitments with the chit fund company agents. after 6 months they have sent me summons to make the payments of that two instalments with interest(in court notice they mentioned amount as 32,000+, on sep 31st i called the chit fund agents for talks to resolve the contravercy, however they ask me to pay 38000/- along with court charges, I accepted to pay that amount but in instalments (and made payment of 20000 on spot), and also paid 5000/- in 1st Oct, and 30th Oct 5000/- respectively,
but I have received again notice from court asking to make the payment.
please advice how can i proceed with this issue. how to reslove this.
Anonymous
15 November 2010 at 21:57
Respected Lawyers,
Is it mandatory to inform insurance company
in case of being involved in a RTA though not
claiming any compensation from the insurance company?
Regards
tdeli
15 November 2010 at 21:06
Hello...
What are the methods to save guard one from Ex parte orders -
Is caveat an answer to the same ...
Is caveat against one or one set of persons whom one apprehends a case will be filed which will lead to ex parte order ...
Does one needs to give information to the person against whom you file the caveat ...
If my questions are not correct kindly explain me whats a caveat ...
Thanks ...
Member (Account Deleted)
15 November 2010 at 20:37
1. What is the difference between admissiblity and relevancy of a document ? What are the legal consequences thereof ?
2. Whether is it true that once the document is relevant it has to be admitted ? (Section 136 of the Evidence Act as it appears to me on a bare reading gives me such an impression) Please kindly correct my impression, if need be.
3. All admissible documents are relvant but not vice-versa. How far this is true.
4. Whether once the documents are admitted the contents thereof are deemed to be proved or that they have to be proved as per the law of evidence. According to me the latter is correct? please kindly tell me the correct position.
Member (Account Deleted)
15 November 2010 at 20:19
whether an order passed on application for production of documents is an interlocutory order ?
what are interlocutory orders under CPC ?
What is the true test to distinguish between the interlocutory and the non-interlocutory orders ?
Swaroop Godbole
15 November 2010 at 20:14
what is release deed without consideration ?
what is "release" ?
whether release can be effected of limited ownership or absolute ownership ??
Anonymous
15 November 2010 at 19:53
My father is in fit and sound mind but he cant write due to Parkinson Disease ...
He has executed a will by his thumb impression.The ques.is that are these necessary so that there is no problems if someone challenges the Will at the time of its probate ---
1.Is it necessary to have a Dr.s certificate which certifies that he cant sign (as he has put a thump impression) on a document as he has Parkinson Disease or his medical history and prescriptions for last 5 years are enough.
2.Is Dr.s certificate necessary that he is in fit and sound mind.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Credit Card Outstanding - Follow up from Bank After writeoff
Dear All
I had a dispute with HSBC for a specific amount . They have reported this as writeoff to CIBIL according to the latest report i have obtained
In the meantime their agents continue to to make unsolicited calls and follow up for the outstanding amount
Can a bank on its volition continue to persue a outstanding after it has written it off ?
what is the legal recourse i have