rajagopalan
12 February 2011 at 14:23
After mediation compromise agreement signed by the client . one clint is not present but his advocate singed for the clint. The signed or not present clint can appeal to this case higher court the appeal is taken by the court.The said mediation agreement is influnce the final decree in sub court. Please give expert information frm leading advocate and others.
Thanking with regrds
anish
12 February 2011 at 13:39
I have given my residential properties on leave & license basis in Gujarat.As far as i know the licensee in Gujarat donot get benefit under rent control act for properties let out after 2001 till 2011 due to ammendment in Bombay Rent Control Act. The said exemption is to be further extendede for ten years from 2011. In case my licensees donot vacate the premises in future am i protected because licensee donot get any benefit or protection under rent act in Gujarat ? In short would court rule in my favour if i have to get the premise vacated ?
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 13:15
Dear Experts,
i saw one 498a case in magistrate court at chennai, two person in witness box told that we are not treat cruelty in my daughter in law, immediately magistrate ask, are you ready any compromise in the case 498a.
my query is is it possible to compromise in the 498a case?
DebUPindia
12 February 2011 at 12:20
Hello Everyone
I have following questions:
1. In Trail court ( District Delhi) District Courts, when the territorial bifurcation got implemented. The date and reference document (PDF or doc) required. Because in LawyerClubIndia it reads>> For example in Delhi, there are three District level courts, viz. Patiala House, Tis Hazari and Karakardooma. All these courts have nearly same powers. However, being on a same horizontal line, these courts are divided territory wise, i.e. area wise. Again for example, cases pertaining to South Delhi, New Delhi and West Delhi will lie before Patiala House, and North Delhi cases will lie before Tis Hazari, and cases pertaining to East Delhi will lie before Karakardooma.
2. For Civil Appeal in HC, if someone misses 90 day period after a prelim decree by trial court, is there any legal way to appeal beyond 90 days?
3. For Civil Appeal in HC, under land real estate what is a court fee structure, per lac of value?
4. Is there any case books/history available online about judgments of property partition suit which cannot be divided by metes and bounds.
Thank You for your help!
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 10:39
A Muslim executed a WILL of his entire property to his 3 sons. he has 4 daughter also.One daughter challenged the WILL and in this suit the other 3 daughters were also joined as defendant but all 3 was ex-parte but actually no proper service was affected on them.The suit has been partly decreed holding that the WILL is genuine but according to MUSLIM LAW the WILL of only 1/3 can be done and for entire share the consent of all heirs is necessary.The defendant could not proved the consent of the 4 daughters.So the court declared the WILL ineffective extent to the share of plaintiff and rejected the share of other three daughter as they not demanded the same. actually they all are have no knowledge about WILL and pend ency of suit.If they were summoned properly they definatly challenge the WILL and claim their respective share. Now after knowledge the WILL and decree of the court the other three daughters wants to claim their share .For that what steps they can take to get their share.
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 08:40
All the property is in my mother's name(purchased by father in her name). I have 2 sisters(both married).
My father is alive. My mother wants to will all the property to me after her death. Can any1(sisters and father{as the property purchased by him}) object on this.
Please tell me the procedure to register will. If possible please provide a will format.
Property is in Haryana and UP
Sushil kumar
12 February 2011 at 00:19
please advise on ex parte rules, on what points judge can order ex parte
2. a false civil case filed in court, where address is wrong, what is law > case can be dismissed. reply submitted, all documented proofs submitted, judge not dismissing,
on submission of false affidavit in court > what rules??
my house in panchkula criminally trespassed - by lock breaking, judge applied IPC 420, droped 211 and 452 etc. not mentioned in orders on what grounds and attached document,
please visit www.mediafire.com/nrihrypklpolicekill, open folder Raj gupta judge complaint study conclusion and full complaint, study files 151,civil case, 170 -175, false case and reply, 257 house trespass complaint, please advise, sushil kumar uae +971557078684
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 21:52
Sir,
I filed a contempt case against the ACP (TP) and the Zonal Commissoner of GHMC for not acting on the orders of the Honourable High Court of AP for stopping further construction of an unauthorized constructon being made in the common area of our apartment.
The ACP (TP) who has also represented the Zonal Commissioner, in his counter affadavit filed in reply to the conempt case before the Honourable High Court of AP sateted that the open balony where the illegal construction is carried is only by the party who has been constructing the structure and nobody in the apartment including the peitioner is using the same.
My question is, how can the ACP (TP) tell who is using which part of the common area in the flats? Even if one does not use a particuar portion of the common area, do the other residents loose their right to it?
He also stated after reciving the complaint from some of the residents it issued a notice under section 452 of HMC act,1955 to the party on 9-2-2010 for stopping the iternal construction work i.e., closing of open balcony even prior to the orders ofthe Honurable High Court of AP on 5th March 2010 and stopped the construction.
The party applied for regulariastion of the construction made by them on 4th March 2010 wich was rejected by the Corporation.
The ACP (TP) has mislead the Honourable High Court by stating that they have stopped constrution after issuing the party a notice 0n 9-2-2010.
I have been continously reminding them that the construction is still being carried out vide letters addressed to the ACP (TP), Deputy Commissioner and the Zonal commissioner, but they ignored them, but in the counter affadavit stated that they have stopped the construction.
Should these discrepancy in the counter affadavit brought to the notice of the High Court?
He also stated that as the regularisation was rejected the Corporation shall take immedaiate steps for demolition of the unauthorised structure. This was on 5th July 2010 and it is not done so far as the pary has taken a status quo from 3rd Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts.
The status quo has not been vacated yet.
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 21:50
Sir,
I filed a contempt case against the ACP (TP) and the Zonal Commissoner of GHMC for not acting on the orders of the Honourable High Court of AP for stopping further construction of an unauthorized constructon being made in the common area of our apartment.
The ACP (TP) who has also represented the Zonal Commissioner, in his counter affadavit filed in reply to the conempt case before the Honourable High Court of AP sateted that the open balony where the illegal construction is carried is only by the party who has been constructing the structure and nobody in the apartment including the peitioner is using the same.
My question is, how can the ACP (TP) tell who is using which part of the common area in the flats? Even if one does not use a particuar portion of the common area, do the other residents loose their right to it?
He also stated after reciving the complaint from some of the residents it issued a notice under section 452 of HMC act,1955 to the party on 9-2-2010 for stopping the iternal construction work i.e., closing of open balcony even prior to the orders ofthe Honurable High Court of AP on 5th March 2010 and stopped the construction.
The party applied for regulariastion of the construction made by them on 4th March 2010 wich was rejected by the Corporation.
The ACP (TP) has mislead the Honourable High Court by stating that they have stopped constrution after issuing the party a notice 0n 9-2-2010.
I have been continously reminding them that the construction is still being carried out vide letters addressed to the ACP (TP), Deputy Commissioner and the Zonal commissioner, but they ignored them, but in the counter affadavit stated that they have stopped the construction.
Should these discrepancy in the counter affadavit brought to the notice of the High Court?
He also stated that as the regularisation was rejected the Corporation shall take immedaiate steps for demolition of the unauthorised structure. This was on 5th July 2010 and it is not done so far as the pary has taken a status quo from 3rd Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts.
The status quo has not been vacated yet.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Defamation
What action be taken against a newspaper agency /or a reporter,who tries to put false statement and allegations in the Newspaper and damaging reputation also by the release of which has offended my Family Member.Can I go ahead and file a case against such new reporters....???Help???