Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 13:16
Dear Friends, Limitation Act Applicable in every court, but in other act if give a special provision for Limitation then not apply
Sanjeevappa. L
13 February 2011 at 11:45
One X had filed a public interest suit in respect of a property and the suit has been decreed in the trail court. Thereafter defendant had preferred a regular appeal. During the pendency of the said appeal the X had died. No other person are in the appeal to continue. What will be the result.can the appeal continues without any respondent. Or Does the legal heirs of the X has to be brought on record. Or who are the next persons to be brought on record to continue the Appeal. Please advise me. Warm regards. Thanks in advance.
Sushil kumar
13 February 2011 at 01:08
dear sir
i am sushil kumar NRI presently in dubai uae,
my house criminally trespassed by house breaking, lock breaking by my criminal relatives with the help of local haryana police
when i complaint in police, police don't want to act, a false civil case filed in court, reply submitted, all documented proofs , submitted, please visit www.mediafire.com/nrihrypklpolicekill, download file 170 to 175, false case and reply,
regards
sushil kumar +971557078684
Member (Account Deleted)
12 February 2011 at 22:27
One company filled an Power of Attorney in the court. This power of Attorney has been transferred in the name of an HR officer by the CFO of a company. The Power of Attorney is to hire and fire the employees. The Power of Attorney is made on a Rs. 100 Stamp paper and has been notarised by a Notary. But it does not bears the stamp in which the notary mentions Noted and Registered. There is Registaration Number on the POA,which is usally had written by the Notary when he registers the document in his Notary Register. In these circumstances is this power of Attorney Legally Valid? If No? what action can be taken against the Notary for this mistake?
Member (Account Deleted)
12 February 2011 at 21:53
Is it legally correct to file an Affidavit during the pendenacy of appeal? This has been done without taking the permission of court. When the Opposite party filled the counter Affidavit the First party filled another Affidavit which is nothing just a modification of the earlier one and said in the open court that this is the same Affidavit and we have got the same affirmed now. What are the remedies available.?
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 18:50
Sir,
My service matter on the issue of Limitation is pending before the CAT. The Hon'ble bench has issue directions to the respondent-employer whether the result for the post has ever been declared/notified but he has not brought into record.
My query is whether I can argue on this fact that is knowledge of right/document necessarily to establish the claim of Applicant has fraudently been concealed by the Respondent and hence the plea of Limitation shall not begin as per section 17 of Limitation Act?
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 17:53
Sir,
I filed a contempt case against the ACP (TP) and the Zonal Commissoner of GHMC for not acting on the orders of the Honourable High Court of AP for stopping further construction of an unauthorized constructon being made in the common area of our apartment.
The ACP (TP) who has also represented the Zonal Commissioner, in his counter affadavit filed in reply to the conempt case before the Honourable High Court of AP sateted that the open balony where the illegal construction is carried is only by the party who has been constructing the structure and nobody in the apartment including the peitioner is using the same.
My question is, how can the ACP (TP) tell who is using which part of the common area in the flats? Even if one does not use a particuar portion of the common area, do the other residents loose their right to it?
He also stated after reciving the complaint from some of the residents it issued a notice under section 452 of HMC act,1955 to the party on 9-2-2010 for stopping the iternal construction work i.e., closing of open balcony even prior to the orders ofthe Honurable High Court of AP on 5th March 2010 and stopped the construction.
The party applied for regulariastion of the construction made by them on 4th March 2010 wich was rejected by the Corporation.
The ACP (TP) has mislead the Honourable High Court by stating that they have stopped constrution after issuing the party a notice 0n 9-2-2010.
I have been continously reminding them that the construction is still being carried out vide letters addressed to the ACP (TP), Deputy Commissioner and the Zonal commissioner, but they ignored them, but in the counter affadavit stated that they have stopped the construction.
Should these discrepancy in the counter affadavit brought to the notice of the High Court?
He also stated that as the regularisation was rejected the Corporation shall take immedaiate steps for demolition of the unauthorised structure. This was on 5th July 2010 and it is not done so far as the pary has taken a status quo from 3rd Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts.
The status quo has not been vacated yet.
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 16:59
What are appealable orders? What orders can be challenged by revision?
DebUPindia
12 February 2011 at 14:48
Hi I have some questions regarding an appeal to HC:
1. Please share what ''Land Acquisition'' cases, as mentioned in the roster in High Court means to a common man?
2. Does a property partition suit falls under a Land Acquisition or Civil(Writ) and to which category?
3. Does Civil Misc and Civil writ petition are same?
Thank you,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
permanent injunction
dear sir,
a person filed a suit against original owner of the property claiming that the property is my ancestral property not to interefering any body in to the land. but the original owners having only no.3 adangal copy in their name there is no other documentary proof. court can grant the injunction infavour of the person who filed the suit.
my contention is there is no proof to show that the person is not possession in property
so kindly advise me
1)in what cases the court can pass an injunction order.
2) in what cases reject the injunction
3)in what principles must have the follow the court while granting injunction
and give proper citations regarding on above points.