Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 16:06
I am one of the legal heir out of five sons my father had at the time of his death in 1996 in Mumbai. Since than two brothers are expired and remaining two have defrauded other legal heir of huge amount of money as they were and even now opertating two joint accounts in the name of my father.
They are not moving ahead with the application filed in High Court for letter of administration in 2009 due to the frauds and to pressurise the other legal heirs or their families. We are therefore stuck as bank of india- stock exchange branch is not giving the statements of accounts and asking for legal heir certificate or a court order.
Pl. help and advice how to get Legal heir certificate to solve the problem ?
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 15:46
My quary is about transfer decree while execution of an arbitration award, whts it is? and how it is executed?
Advocate Abhijeet singh
14 February 2011 at 12:06
sir greeting of the day
sir a person is in govt department and head of internal audit team, once a time when he and his audit team autited any branch of head office he did not captured the Emmbazalement of rs 40000/- done by cashier and on same time a other party also did same not capture 100000/-.
now Head office given punishment to both 1.in second case punishment is 10% of emmbezalment deposite in department that is 10000/-
2. IN ist case 2 increment wiht future effect stop that one is 1000/- means upto retainment thats apporimate till retairmnent 500000/
what we do now
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 08:54
What documents are required to be submitted to Tahsildar as I am told that tahsildar are empowered to issue Legal Heir Certificate ? Pl. help.
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 04:02
Dear Sir/Madam
Registery is in my Name for 6.5 karnal for 57 number but this registery is shairing . menas total land 499 karnal(in which 13 number like 20,50,51,57,60 and other)
but in registery -- mere ko kabja mela hai 57 number me jo ki 20 karnal ka hai jis me se mere ko 6.5 karnal ka kabja mela hai mere registery 1994 me hoye thi
my intakal is also for sharing in all 13 number
now mere ko other person problem karte hai
ab me kaya karsakata hu
Kaya mere ko 57 mumber me 6.5 karnal jamin mele gi
ya nahi mele gi
please tell me
Thanks
Mahesh Gurjar
manas
13 February 2011 at 22:45
Can an offer to one's kith and kin be consider to be an invitation to public?Explain this statement with the help of a case law.
Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 19:49
Judgments relting in which banks have been held liable for deficiency in services.Bank has dishonored the cheque even there was sufficient balance in complainant's account.judgment in whcih maximum awrd has been passed
Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 19:48
Judgments relting in which banks have been held liable for deficiency in services.Bank has dishonored the cheque even there was sufficient balance in complainant's account.judgment in whcih maximum awrd has been passed
Jegaraj
13 February 2011 at 16:37
Dear All,
One of my client's daughter has runaway with her boy friend and they have also got married and registered the same.
now there was a mediation session in my office and we have convinced the girl to execute a registered release deed. My client who is an officer in a govt of india undertaking has many properties which he doesnt want to disclose particulars to every one.
he has also enquired with a local document writer and that person has said that they can register a general partition right release deed without mentioning any description of property.
at this point my doubt is
1. whether a general release deed without description of property is valid in law ?
2. what is the effect of the same ?
3. Under what provisions of law in tamilnadu?
4. is there any relevant rulings in this regards ?
any other advice on the captioned subject is also much appriciated.
thanks in advance.
Jegaraj
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 17 of Limitation Act
In case the OP employer have filed the petition in the CAT raising the plea of Limitation and my version was that OP has made the concealment of result and I could not be acquainted with the status of result in year 2001 and came to know about the status of result in year 2007 only by the way of RTI Applications
On previous hearing The Hon'ble CAT has re-questioned the employer whether the result was notified? which he failed to explain
Now the bench has asked me why should I filed the RTI only in year 2007 and I relied upon section 17 of Limitation Act-(Effect of fraud and mistake) and judgments which relied that when employer is in fault it should not stand on limitation
But bench didnot satisfied it
KINDLY inform whether I can make appeal before High Court?