G.Nagarajeshwar Rao
07 March 2011 at 21:50
Respected Experts!
Suit filed for recovery of money with a petition attachment before judgment. The court ordered conditional attachment giving time of 7 days to furnish security. No third party security was furnished. Subsequently attachment is affected. The defendant had executed a G.P.A., in favour of third parties. Meanwhile the said third parties got executed sale deed in their favour by using G.P.A. Thereafter they came to court to raise the attachment which was affected on the property. The trial court raised the attachment. The plaintiff preferred revision on the order of the trial court. The High court of A.P. ordered that not to alienate the property in the hands of the third parties and the property shall be executed basing on the result of the suit. The suit is decreed. Thereafter E.P. is filed for sale of the said property arraying the subsequent purchasers. At initial stage the trial court rejected the E.P. against the subsequent purchasers. The same is preferred to High court and the High court held that the subsequent parties are necessary parties to adjudge the E.P. and if they are any interest they come with claim petition. The subsequent purchasers set exparte after filing their Vakalat., the defendant No.1 [borrower] contested the E.P. The question is whether the court can issue sale proclamation strait a way or court can issue the attachment again. please conform and en-light me properly with suitable authorities.
Balaji Bakthavathsal
07 March 2011 at 19:01
A suit was filed in the District Munsif Court with a request to evict the tenant who is running a small shop and doing business. Explaining the the present condition of the house and the need for personal use, the case dragged for about an year. The judge after going through all the formalities and seeing the pathetic condition of the house through the photographs attached with the plaint, intimated that order would be issued in a weeks time. But after a prolonged period, the judge suddently told that the affidavit is not correct as it is coming under the purview of the Rent Control and asked to submit a fresh affidavit. Is it right ? The place is not a city but a small district Headquarters and I feel that it is not coming under the Rent Control Board. Please advice.
usif Magsi
07 March 2011 at 18:33
Bhai. I have taken the brief of the Suit for the pre emption on the side of the defendant, the defendant had purchased the area of the 200 yards, but soon sold the same to an other person, who is the nephew of the plaintiff, now the defendant is neither owner nor possessor of the suit land, but the plaintiff is not filing the suit against to his nephew who is at present owner and possor and no issue against my defendant, What the grounds are in the favour of the defendant for getting rid of the suit. thanks
G.Nagi Reddy
07 March 2011 at 16:51
dear experts,
what is village adangal copies and chitta
particularly in andhra pradesh what system follows, and moreover if a person enters his name in village records wrongly can that person can acquire any legal right.
raghavendra
07 March 2011 at 16:36
sir ,
i am going to perchase land in bangalore, owner is daying he is paying tax to BBMP , but in RTC land status is in agriculture, could it possible to that,
could BBMP area would have agrculture land
raghavendra
07 March 2011 at 16:33
sir ,
can one file complaint before the consumer forum ,evenafter filed MVC case , can it possible to file dual case simultaneously ,
prakash
07 March 2011 at 15:45
sir,
Please advice me whether a son who was adopted by other people by executing an adoption deed,have any rights in his real father's property?
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 12:54
Respected Experts,
I have a SLP(Civil) in Supreme court and it is coming for hearing, last week of this month. I want to engage a Senior Counsel in this regard. My budget is Rs.2 Lakhs ( till the completiton of SLP).Can anybody suggest a good Senior Lawer with address and phone numbers if any, so as to enable me to contact them, at an earliest.
javed ahmed
07 March 2011 at 10:42
IF A CITIZEN OF BANGLADESH TRANFERS IMMOVABLE PROPERTY OF WHICH HE IS THE OWNER AND WHICH IS LOCATED IN INDIA TO AN INDIAN CITIZEN DOES THE INDIAN CITIZEN NEED TO OBTAIN PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA?IF THE ANSWER IS IN AFFIRMATIVE THEN WHAT CONSEQUENCES WILL FOLLOW IF HE FAILS TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED APPROVAL?
REGARDS
JOHN
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cancellation of Adoption Deed - Can it be challenged
Hello Everyone,
I was given in Adoption by my parents to my maternal grandparents at my age of 10.But i continued to live with my natural parents.
Recently (24 years after the adoption took place) i decided to challenge the validity of the adoption . My lawyer highlighted the fact that i was living with my original parents and not with the adopted parents.
The judgement came out in my favor and the original adoption deed was declared null and void.
My question is , if anyone can challenge or contest the cancellation of the adoption deed. If it can be challenged who can challenge it?. Can my brother or his in laws from my original parents challenge the cancellation of adoption deed ?.
Thanks